You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 74, Issue 1
  • Response to: ‘Is there a need for new thresholds to define remission and low disease activity by Disease Activity Score 28 calculated with C reactive protein? Real life data from a local registry’ by Favalli et al

Share

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

Electronic pages
Correspondence response
Response to: ‘Is there a need for new thresholds to define remission and low disease activity by Disease Activity Score 28 calculated with C reactive protein? Real life data from a local registry’ by Favalli et al
Free

Share this article

Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.

Twitter logo Facebook logo LinkedIn logo

Email this article to a friend

We will not keep your email address; we ask for it so your friend knows the email isn't spam.
Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response to: ‘Is there a need for new thresholds to define remission and low disease activity by Disease Activity Score 28 calculated with C reactive protein? Real life data from a local registry’ by Favalli et al
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.