Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: A disability phase-specific analysis
Corresponding Author
Niklas Krause MD, MPH, PhD
Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
Public Health Institute, Berkeley
School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, 140 Warren Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360.Search for more papers by this authorLeo J. Deegan PhD
Department of Demography, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
Search for more papers by this authorLinda Rudolph MD, MPH
Division of Workers' Compensation, State of California
Search for more papers by this authorRichard J. Brand PhD
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Niklas Krause MD, MPH, PhD
Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
Public Health Institute, Berkeley
School of Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, 140 Warren Hall, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-7360.Search for more papers by this authorLeo J. Deegan PhD
Department of Demography, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
Search for more papers by this authorLinda Rudolph MD, MPH
Division of Workers' Compensation, State of California
Search for more papers by this authorRichard J. Brand PhD
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Background
Job characteristics may constitute a barrier to return-to-work (RTW) after compensated disabling low back pain (LBP). This study examines the impact of psychosocial job factors on time to RTW separately during the acute and subacute/chronic disability phases.
Methods
This is a retrospective cohort study of 433 LBP workers' compensation claimants with 1–4 years of follow-up. The association of psychosocial job factors with duration of work disability was estimated with Cox regression models, adjusting for injury history and severity, physical workload, and demographic and employment factors.
Results
High physical and psychological job demands and low supervisory support are each associated with about 20% lower RTW rates during all disability phases. High job control, especially control over work and rest periods, is associated with over 30% higher RTW rates, but only during the subacute/chronic disability phase starting 30 days after injury. Job satisfaction and coworker support are unrelated to time to RTW.
Conclusions
Duration of work disability is associated with psychosocial job factors independent of injury severity and physical workload. The impact of these risk factors changes significantly over the course of disability. Am. J. Ind. Med. 40:374–392, 2001. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
REFERENCES
- Bernacki EJ, Guidera JA, Schaefer JA, Tsai S. 2000. A facilitated early return to work program at a large urban medical center. J Occup Environ Med 42(12): 1172–1177.
- Bernard BP. 1997. Musculoskeletal disorders and workplace factors. DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 97–141 Cincinnati, “U.S. Departmentof Health and Human Services, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health”.
- Bigos SJ. 1992. The practitioner's guide to the industrial back problem: Part II. Helping the patient with the return to work predicament. Semin Spine Surg 4(1): 55–63.
- Bigos SJ, Battie MC, Spengler DM, Fisher LD, Fordyce WE, Hansson TH, Nachemson AL, Wortley MD. 1991. A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury. [published erratum appears in Spine 1991 Jun;16(6):688] Spine 16(1): 1–6.
- FS Bloch, R Prins, editors. 2001. Who returns to work and why? A six-country study on work incapacity and reintegration. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. 306 p.
- Bongers PM, de Winter CR, Kompier MA, Hildebrandt VH. 1993. Psychosocial factors at work and musculoskeletal disease. Scand J Work Environ Health 19(5): 297–312.
- Cats-Baril WL, Frymoyer JW. 1991. Identifying patients at risk of becoming disabled because of low-back pain. The vermont rehabilitation engineering center predictive model. Spine 16(6): 605–607.
- Cheadle A, Franklin G, Wolfhagen C, Savarino J, Liu PY, Salley C, Weaver M. 1994. Factors influencing the duration of work-related disability: a population-based study of Washington State workers' compensation. Am J Public Health 84(2): 190–196.
- Cherkin DC, Deyo RA, Volinn E, Loeser JD. 1992. Use of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) to identify hospitalizations for mechanical low back problems in administrative databases. Spine 17(7): 817–825.
- Cohen S, Wills TA. 1985. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull 98(2): 310–357.
- Coste J, Delecoeuillerie G, Cohen de Lara A, Le Parc JM, Paolaggi JB. 1994. Clinical course and prognostic factors in acute low back pain: an inception cohort study in primary care practice. Br Med J 308(6928): 577–580.
- Cox DR. 1972. Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 34: 187–220.
- Crook J, Moldofsky H, Shannon H. 1998. Determinants of disability after a work related musculoskeletal injury [see comments]. J Rheumat 25(8): 1570–1577.
-
Dasinger LK,
Krause N,
Deegan LJ,
Brand RJ,
Rudolph L.
1999.
Duration of work disability after low back injury: a comparison of administrative and self-reported outcomes.
Am J Ind Med
35(6):
619–631.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199906)35:6<619::AID-AJIM9>3.0.CO;2-I CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
- Dasinger LK, Krause N, Deegan LJ, Brand JB, Rudolph L. 2000. Physical workplace factors and return to work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. J Occup Environ Med 42(3): 323–333.
- Dasinger LK, Krause N, Thompson PJ, Brand RJ, Rudolph L. 2001 Doctor proactive communications, return to work recommendation, and duration of disability after a compensated low back injury. J Occup Environ Health 43(6): 515–525.
- Deyo RA, Diehl AK. 1988. Psychosocial predictors of disability in patients with low back pain. J Rheumatology 15(10): 1557–1564.
- Edholm O. 1966. The assessment of habitual activity. Physical activity in health and disease. Oslo, Norway: Universitetsforlaget. p187–197.
- Feuerstein M, Beattie P. 1995. Biobehavioral factors affecting pain and disability in low back pain: mechanisms and assessment. Phys Ther 75(4): 267–280.
-
Feuerstein M,
Thebarge RW.
1991.
Perceptions of disability and occupational stress as discriminators of work disability in patients with chronic pain.
J Occup Rehabil
1(3):
185–195.
10.1007/BF01073455 Google Scholar
- Feuerstein M, Berkowitz SM, Huang GD. 1999. Predictors of occupational low back disability: implications for secondary prevention. J Occup Environ Med 41(12): 1024–1031.
- Fitzler SL, Berger RA. 1982. Attitudinal change: the Chelsea back program. Occup Health Saf 51(2): 24–26.
- Fitzler SL, Berger RA. 1983. Chelsea back program: one year later. Occup Health Saf 52(7): 52–54.
- Frank JW, Pulcins IR, Kerr MS, Shannon HS, Stansfeld SA. 1995. Occupational back pain—an unhelpful polemic. Scand J Work Environ Health 21(1): 3–14.
- Frank JW, Brooker AS, DeMaio SE, Kerr MS, Maetzel A, Shannon HS, Sullivan TJ, Norman RW, Wells RP. 1996a. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part II: what do we know about secondary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention after disability begins. Spine 21(24): 2918–2929.
- Frank JW, Kerr MS, Brooker AS, DeMaio SE, Maetzel A, Shannon HS, Sullivan TJ, Norman RW, Wells RP. 1996b. Disability resulting from occupational low back pain. Part I: what do we know about primary prevention? A review of the scientific evidence on prevention before disability begins. Spine 21(24): 2908–2917.
- Frank J, Sinclair S, Hogg-Johnson S, Shannon H, Bombardier C, Beaton D, Cole D. 1998. Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope–if we can just get all the players onside. J Can Med Assoc 158(12): 1625–1631.
-
Franklin GM,
Fulton-Kehoe D.
1996.
Outcomes research in Washington State workers' compensation.
Am J Ind Med
29(6):
642–648.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<642::AID-AJIM8>3.0.CO;2-L CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
- Gluck JV, Oleinick A. 1998. Claim rates of compensable back injuries by age, gender, occupation, and industry. Do they relate to return-to-work experience? Spine 23(14): 1572–1587.
- Hogg-Johnson S, Cole DC. The ECC Prognostic Modelling Group. 1998. Early prognostic factors for duration of benefits among workers with compensated soft tissue injuries. Toronto, Ontario: Institute for Work and Health. Working Paper No. 64R1.
- Høgelund J. 2000. Bringing the sick back to work: labor market reintegration of the long-term sicklisted in the Netherlands and Denmark (dissertation). Danish National Institute of Social Research. Copenhagen: Roskilde University. 258 p.
- Ilmarinen L, Knauth P, Klimmer F. 1979. The applicability of the Edholm scale for activity studies in industry. Ergonomics 22: 369–376.
- Infante-Rivard C, Lortie M. 1996. Prognostic factors for return to work after a first compensated episode of back pain. Occup Environ Med 53(7): 488–494.
- Karasek R, Theorell T. 1990. Healthy work: stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books, Harper Collins Publishers.
- Karasek RA, Baker D, Marxer F, Ahlbom A, Theorell TG. 1981. Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: a prospective study of Swedish men. Am J Public Health 71: 694–705.
- Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. 1998. The Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol 3(4): 322–355.
- Kelsey JL, Golden AL. 1988. Occupational and workplace factors associated with low back pain. Occup Med 3(1): 7–16.
- Klein BP, Jensen RC, Sanderson LM. 1984. Assessment of workers' compensation claims for back strains/sprains. J Occup Med 26(6): 443–448.
- Koster M, Alfredsson L, Michelsen H, Vingard E, Kilbom A. 1999. Retrospective versus original information on physical and psychosocial exposure at work. Scand J Work Environ Health 25(5): 410–414.
- Krause N. 1993. Work disability and low back pain: a new classification model for research and intervention. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (Social Science Center Berlin).
- Krause N, Ragland DR. 1994. Occupational disability due to low back pain: a new interdisciplinary classification based on a phase model of disability. Spine 19(9): 1011–1020.
- Krause N, Ragland DR, Greiner BA, Syme SL, Fisher JM. 1997. Psychosocial job factors associated with back and neck pain in public transit operators. Scand J Work Environ Health 23(3): 179–186.
- Krause N, Dasinger LK, Neuhauser F. 1998a. Modified work and return to work: a review of the literature. J Occup Rehabil 8(2): 113–139.
- Krause N, Ragland D, Fisher J, Syme S. 1998b. Psychosocial job factors, physical workload, and incidence of work-related spinal injury: a 5-year prospective study of urban transit operators. Spine 23(23): 2507–2516.
- Krause N, Ragland DR, Fisher JM, Syme SL. 1998c. 1998 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies-psychosocial job factors, physical workload, and incidence of work-related spinal injury: a 5-year prospective study of urban transit operators. Spine 23(23): 2507–2516.
-
Krause N,
Dasinger LK,
Deegan LJ,
Brand RJ,
Rudolph L.
1999.
Alternative approaches for measuring duration of work disability after low back injury based on administrative workers' compensation data.
Am J Ind Med
35(6):
604–618.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199906)35:6<604::AID-AJIM8>3.0.CO;2-T CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
- Krause N, Frank JW, Sullivan T, Dasinger LK, Sinclair SJ. 2001. Determinants of duration of disability and return to work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med 40: 464–484 (this issue).
- Kristensen TS. 1991. Sickness absence and work strain among Danish slaughterhouse workers: an analysis of absence from work regarded as coping behaviour. Soc Sci Med 32(1): 15–27.
- Landsbergis PA, Greiner B, Krause NJS, Theorell T. 2000. Measurement of psychosocial workplace exposure variables. The workplace and cardiovascular disease. state of the art reviews in occupational medicine. Philadelphia: Hanley and Belfus p163–188.
- Leavitt SS, Johnston TL, Beyer RD. 1971. The process of recovery: patterns in industrial back injury. 2. Predicting outcomes from early case data. Ind Med Surg 40(9): 7–15.
- Leboeuf-Yde C, Lauritsen JM, Lauritzen T. 1997. Why has the search for causes of low back pain largely been nonconclusive? Spine 22(8): 877–881.
- Leigh JP, Markowitz SB, Fahs M, Shin C, Landrigan PJ. 1997. Occupational injury and illness in the United States. Estimates of costs, morbidity, and mortality. Arch Intern Med 157(14): 1557–1568.
- Lin D, Wei L. 1989. The robust inference for the Cox proportional hazards model. J Am Stat Assoc 84: 1074–1078.
- Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, Esdaile JM, Suissa S, Gosselin L, Simard R, Turcotte J, Lemaire J. 1997. A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine 22(24): 2911–2918.
- Nachemson AL. 1992. Newest knowledge of low back pain. A critical look. Clin Orthop 279: 8–20.
-
Oleinick A,
Gluck JV,
Guire K.
1996a.
Factors affecting first return to work following a compensable occupational back injury.
Am J Ind Med
30(5):
540–555.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199611)30:5<540::AID-AJIM3>3.0.CO;2-X CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
-
Oleinick A,
Gluck JV,
Guire KE.
1996b.
Concordance between ANSI occupational back injury codes and claim form diagnoses and a lower bound estimate of the fraction associated with disc displacement/herniation.
Am J Ind Med
30(5):
556–568.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199611)30:5<556::AID-AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-R CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar
- Papageorgiou AC, Macfarlane GJ, Thomas E, Croft PR, Jayson MI, Silman AJ. 1997. Psychosocial factors in the workplace–do they predict new episodes of low back pain? Evidence from the South Manchester Back Pain Study. Spine 22(10): 1137–1142.
- Polatin PB. 1991. Predictors of low back pain disability. Conservative care of back pain. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins. p265–273.
- Polatin PB, Kinney RK, Gatchel RJ, Lillo E, Mayer TG. 1993. Psychiatric illness and chronic low-back pain. The mind and the spine–which goes first? Spine 18(1): 66–71.
- MH Pope, GBJ Andersson, JW Frymoyer, DB Chaffin, Eds. 1991. Occupational low back pain: assessment, treatment and prevention. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book.
- Rossignol M, Baetz J. 1987. Task-related risk factors for spinal injury: validation of a self-administered questionnaire on hospital employees. Ergonomics 30(11): 1531–1540.
- Sauter S, Swanson N. 1996. An ecological model of musculoskeletal disorders in office work. Beyond biomechanics: psychosocial aspects of musculoskeletal disorders in office work. London: Taylor & Francis Ltd. p 3–21.
- Schmidt SH, Oort-Marburger D, Meijman TF. 1995. Employment after rehabilitation for musculoskeletal impairments: the impact of vocational rehabilitation and working on a trial basis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76(10): 950–954.
- Schnall PL, Landsbergis PA, Baker D. 1994. Job strain and cardiovascular disease. Annu Rev of Public Health 15: 381–411.
- PL Schnall, K Belkic, P Landsbergis, D Baker, editors. 2000. The workplace and cardiovascular disease. In: State of the art reviews in occupational medicine. Philadelphia: Hanley & Belfus.
- Sinclair SJ, Hogg-Johnson SH, Mondloch MV, Shields SA. 1997. The effectiveness of an early active intervention program for workers with soft-tissue injuries. The Early Claimant Cohort Study. Spine 22(24): 2919–2931.
- Snook SH. 1988. The costs of back pain in industry. Occup Med 3(1): 1–5.
- Spengler DM, Bigos SJ, Martin NA, Zeh J, Fisher L, Nachemson A. 1986. Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study: I. Overview and cost analysis. Spine 11(3): 241–251.
- Spitzer WO, Le Blanc FE, Dupuis M. 1987. Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine 12:(7 Suppl). S1–59.
- Stata Corp. 1997. Stata statistical software. Texas: Stata Corporation.
- Taylor FW. 1914. The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper.
- Theorell T, Harms-Ringdahl K, Ahlberg-Hulten G, Westin B. 1991. Psychosocial job factors and symptoms from the locomotor system–a multicausal analysis. Scand J Rehabil Med 23(3): 165–173.
- Viikari-Juntura E, Rauas S, Martikainen R, Kuosma E, Riihimäki H, Takala E-P, Saarenmaa K. 1996. Validity of self-reported physical work load in epidemiologic studies on musculoskeletal disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health 22(4): 251–259.
- Von Korff M. 1994. Studying the natural history of back pain. Spine 19: (18 Suppl). 2041S–2046S.
- Waddell G, Newton M, Henderson I, Somerville D, Main CJ. 1993. A Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and the role of fear-avoidance beliefs in chronic low back pain and disability. Pain 52(2): 157–168.
- Webster BS, Snook SH. 1994. The cost of 1989 workers' compensation low back pain claims. Spine 19(10): 1111–1115; discussion 1116.
- Wiktorin C, Karlqvist L, Winkel J. 1993. Stockholm MUSIC I Study Group. Validity of self-reported exposures to work postures and manual materials handling. Scand J Work Environ Health 19(3): 208–214.
- Wiktorin C, Hjelm EW, Winkel J, Koster M. Stockholm MUSIC I Study Group. 1996. Reproducibility of a questionnaire for assessment of physical load during work and leisure time. J Occupat Environ Med 38(2): 190–201.
- Wilder CF. 1973. Limitation of activity due to chronic conditions, United States,1969 and1970. In: National Center for Health Statistics, Rockville, MD 80p.
- Williams SA, Feuerstein M, Durbin D, Pezzullo J. 1998. Health care and indemnity costs across the natural history of disability in occupational low back pain. Spine 23(21): 2329–2336.