Challenges and possible solutions when conducting an endovascular treatment trial for medium vessel occlusion strokes
Problem | Explanation | Possible solution |
Technique and technology related | ||
Lack of appropriate devices | Current treatment devices are not tailored towards MeVOs and are 'relatively oversized'. This might increase the risk of iatrogenic complications | Development of smaller devices that are optimized for MeVO thrombectomy |
Inability to detect MeVOs | Accurate and reliable detection of MeVOs can be challenging for less experienced physicians, particularly on single phase CT angiography |
|
Training related | ||
Lack of skill/expertise | Neurointerventional expertise in low volume centers might not be sufficient to routinely offer safe and responsible EVT treatment for MeVOs |
|
Lack of appropriate outcome assessment tools | ||
Lack of granularity of current outcome measurement scales | Established outcome measurement scales for acute stroke such as the mRS and NIHSS scales may not adequately capture subtle clinical deficits and symptoms |
|
Emerging alternative medical treatment options | ||
Development of alternative medical treatment options | Alternative lytic agents with increased efficacy such as intravenous tenecteplase16 may reduce the need for EVT in MeVO patients | Inclusion criteria that ensure that only patients who are ineligible for intravenous treatment or in whom this treatment failed are enrolled |
EVT, endovascular treatment; MeVO, medium vessel occlusion; mRS, modified Rankin score; NIHSS, National institutes of Health Stroke Scale.