Emergent carotid stenting versus no stenting for acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion: a meta-analysis | Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Subscribe
Log In More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
Basket
Search More

Search for this keyword

Advanced search

Close More
Main menu

Latest content

Current issue

Archive

For authors

Podcasts

About
Subscribe
Log in More

Log in via Institution
Log in via OpenAthens
Log in via your Society

Log in using your username and password
For personal accounts OR managers of institutional accounts

Username *

Password *

Forgot your log in details?Register a new account?
Forgot your user name or password?
BMJ Journals More

You are viewing from: Department GEZ-LTA Erasmushogeschool

Citation Tools

This article has a correction. Please see:

Correction: Emergent carotid stenting versus no stenting for acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion: a meta-analysis - May 01, 2024

Ischemic stroke

Original research

Emergent carotid stenting versus no stenting for acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion: a meta-analysis

Download to a citation manager

Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:

Cite this article as:: Diana F, Romoli M, Toccaceli G, et al

Emergent carotid stenting versus no stenting for acute ischemic stroke due to tandem occlusion: a meta-analysis

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery 2023;15:428-433.