Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Lightning in Brunei: a follow-up of a single strike affecting 29 serving personnel of the Royal Gurkha Rifles
  1. Seth Makin1,2 and
  2. I Austin3,4
  1. 1 Academic Department of Military General Practice, Defence Medical Services, Lichfield, UK
  2. 2 Manor Farm, Swepstone, UK
  3. 3 Trinity College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
  4. 4 Medical Service, Royal Navy, Dartmouth, UK
  1. Correspondence to Seth Makin; smakin{at}gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction On 25 August 2020, 29 British Forces Brunei (BFB) service personnel were hospitalised after being struck by lightning during a company-level training exercise in the Brunei jungle. This paper observes both the initial injury pattern of the personnel and their occupational health status at the 22-month point.

Method All 29 of the personnel affected by the lightning strike on 25 August 2020 were followed up until the 22-month point, allowing observation of injury patterns and management as well as the long-term outcomes. They were all members of two Royal Gurkha Rifles and received local hospital care and British Defence Healthcare input. Initial data were collected for mandatory reporting processes, and cases were followed up as a routine part of the Unit Health processes.

Results Of the 29 identified as having lightning-related injuries, 28 returned to Medically Fully Deployable status. Acoustic trauma was the most common injury which was treated in several cases by oral steroids with some receiving intratympanic steroids. Multiple personnel suffered transient or short-lasting sensory changes and pain. 1756 service personnel days were covered by restrictions.

Conclusion The pattern of the lightning-related injuries was different to that which would be expected from previous reports. This is likely due to the unique nature of each lightning strike, combined with the ample unit support, the fit and resilient cohort and the rapid initiation of treatment, especially with regard to hearing.

Brunei is at high risk of lightning strikes, planning for them is now standard for BFB. Despite lightning strikes having the potential to cause mortality and mass casualty events, this case study shows that such events do not necessarily result in severe long-term injury or mortality.

  • Accident and emergency medicine
  • Primary care
  • Trauma management

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors SM was RMO 2RGR and initiated the paper writing the first draft and is the author responsible for the overall content and is the guarantor. IA provided significant input in the editing, legibility, presentational and organisational aspects.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.