Table 3

OR and 95% CI for associations between metrics of injury severity and personal, trip, crash circumstance and route characteristics (N=683)

Did not continue by bike
N=528 (77%)
Transported to hospital by ambulance
N=251 (37%)
Admitted to hospital
N=60 (8.8%)
CTAS*
1 or 2, N=75 (11%)
3, N=284 (42%)
4 or 5, N=320 (47%)
OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)OR (95% CI)
Sex
 Male1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)
 Female1.91 (1.26 to 2.92)1.34 (0.93 to 1.93)1.07 (0.59 to 1.94)0.98 (0.71 to 1.35)
Age
 19–291 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)
 30–391.15 (0.70 to 1.88)1.18 (0.75 to 1.85)1.18 (0.54 to 2.61)1.29 (0.87 to 1.91)
 40–491.22 (0.70 to 2.14)1.40 (0.83 to 2.34)1.96 (0.89 to 4.33)2.07 (1.33 to 3.23)
 50–591.50 (0.77 to 2.95)1.04 (0.57 to 1.91)1.02 (0.35 to 2.97)1.57 (0.95 to 2.62)
 ≥601.33 (0.63 to 2.82)2.57 (1.31 to 5.05)3.52 (1.37 to 9.04)1.42 (0.78 to 2.60)
Considered themselves an experienced cyclist
 No1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)
 Yes1.36 (0.63 to 2.95)2.16 (0.97 to 4.83)1.03 (0.28 to 3.84)1.52 (0.78 to 2.95)
Cycling frequency†1.00 (0.78 to 1.76)0.92 (0.72 to 1.08)1.18 (0.85 to 1.50)1.18 (1.00 to 1.38)
Time of day
 Day1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)
 Dusk or dawn0.65 (0.33 to 1.29)0.53 (0.24 to 1.13)0.75 (0.21 to 2.62)0.72 (0.39 to 1.30)
 Night0.90 (0.53 to 1.54)1.16 (0.71 to 1.90)1.87 (0.90 to 3.86)0.90 (0.58 to 1.40)
Motor vehicle collision
 No1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)
 Yes3.46 (2.07 to 5.76)3.66 (2.44 to 5.48)1.27 (0.63 to 2.54)2.03 (1.41 to 2.90)
Route type
 Major street1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)
 Local street1.08 (0.61 to 1.92)1.44 (0.86 to 2.39)2.76 (1.15 to 6.62)1.18 (0.75 to 1.84)
 Sidewalk1.15 (0.42 to 3.19)3.72 (1.37 to 10.1)3.26 (0.51 to 20.7)1.31 (0.56 to 3.06)
 Multiuse path1.33 (0.52 to 3.44)2.18 (0.83 to 5.77)7.56 (1.43 to 40.0)1.22 (0.55 to 2.68)
 Bicycle-specific infrastructure0.98 (0.50 to 1.94)1.02 (0.55 to 1.89)0.89 (0.27 to 2.99)1.27 (0.74 to 2.18)
Intersection
 No1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)
 Yes0.57 (0.36 to 0.88)1.44 (0.98 to 2.13)1.04 (0.53 to 2.04)0.89 (0.63 to 1.26)
Streetcar or train tracks
 No1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)
 Yes1.11 (0.65 to 1.91)1.03 (0.63 to 1.70)0.98 (0.39 to 2.47)1.36 (0.88 to 2.10)
Grade
 Flat or uphill1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)1 (reference)
 Downhill1.32 (0.89 to 1.96)1.62 (1.14 to 2.32)1.23 (0.68 to 2.22)1.31 (0.96 to 1.79)
Motor vehicle speed‡1.05 (0.89 to 1.24)1.21 (1.01 to 1.43)1.24 (0.91 to 1.69)1.08 (0.94 to 1.24)
  • Multiple logistic regression models; all independent variables significant in at least one unadjusted analysis included.

  • Bold indicates that the odds ratio is statistically significantly different from 1.0.

  • *CTAS=Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale, grouped into three categories for analysis using ordinal logistic regression; the OR represents the comparison of categories 1 and 2 versus 3, 4 and 5 and categories 1, 2 and 3 versus 4 and 5 under the proportional odds assumption. The proportional odds assumption was met, meaning that the ORs for these two comparisons are equivalent.

  • †Mean cycling frequency=152 trips/year, SD=81 trips/year; ORs and CIs calculated for a one SD increase.

  • ‡Mean motor vehicle speed=36 km/h, SD=9.5 km/h; ORs and CIs calculated for a one SD increase. This is a mean of means: 683 sites, each with 5 speed measurements taken during the site observation period (∼30 min), then averaged. Speeds were measured using a Bushnell Velocity Speed Gun (Overland Park, Kansas, USA).