Table 2

Inclusion and exclusion criteria according to PICOS

ItemInclusionExclusion
Population
  • The study includes at least 20% undergraduate medical students (but can be a mix between, eg, medical students and residents or other health profession students).

  • The study includes faculty involved in undergraduate medical education.

  • Only postgraduate/post-registration medical graduates (eg, residents).

  • Students from other health professions.

  • Community members/patients.

Intervention
  • Any intervention aimed at intervening within the system of medical education, the medical curriculum or other aspects of the medical school.

  • Interventions aimed to teach medical students about health economics and cost-efficiency.

  • Interventions employing medical students as health workers to reduce costs in patient care (eg, employing students as medical scribes).

  • Interventions that take place outside of the medical school setting or that do not address aspects of medical education, medical student life or the medical school setting.

Comparator
  • Any comparator. A comparison must be made in order to report incremental costs and benefits.

  • No comparator (eg, cost-analysis or a description of an intervention).

Outcome
  • Any reported incremental cost (eg, monetary cost or time invested by faculty) and effect (eg, quality-adjusted life years or academic performance) that is numerically quantified.

  • Qualitative descriptions of costs or cost-effectiveness (eg, staff considered the intervention cost-effective).

  • Analyses that only report costs, or only report effects, or only report these for the intervention arm.

Study type
  • Economic evaluations: cost-utility analysis, cost-benefit analysis, cost-minimalisation analysis.

  • Decision-analytic models.

  • Alongside trial cost-effectiveness analysis.

  • Not an economic evaluation.

  • Cost analysis (no effects).

  • Opinion papers, reviews, letters to the editor, conference abstracts.

  • Not available in English.