Table 2

Sociodemographic characteristics of the women interviewed in the cross-sectional surveys of the outcome evaluation

Sociodemographic characteristicsBaselineEndline
Intervention
(A)
(N=1249)
Comparison
(B)
(N=1187)
P value
A versus B
Intervention
(C)
(N=1188)
Comparison
(D)
(N=1310)
P value
A versus C
Women’s parity,
 Mean (SD)2.95 (1.68)3.06 (1.74)0.1422.81 (1.58)2.91 (1.65)0.008
Women’s education, %
 No formal education56.057.50.53547.049.4<0.001
 1–5 years12.314.50.11213.914.70.200
 6–9 years15.815.20.72920.020.20.005
 ≥10 years of schooling15.912.80.06419.216.70.020
Any mass media exposure, %
 No62.974.5<0.00153.463.0<0.001
 Yes37.125.5<0.00146.637.0<0.001
 Belongs to Hindu religion, %98.591.1<0.00199.290.80.136
Households’ wealth quintile, %
 First13.628.4<0.00115.424.70.259
 Second18.321.10.12619.620.00.383
 Third20.319.00.46820.519.40.870
 Fourth23.815.8<0.00123.017.30.669
 Fifth24.115.7<0.00121.518.60.122
Scheduled caste/tribe, %
 No68.669.30.81569.665.50.654
 Yes31.430.70.81530.434.50.654
Woman herself is a self-help group member, %
 No31.921.9<0.00139.333.5<0.001
 Yes68.178.1<0.00160.766.5<0.001
Women’s self-help group membership duration in months
 Mean (SD)34.8 (20.1)26.9 (17.9)<0.00138.5 (22.6)36.1 (20.5)0.001
Nuclear family structure, %
 No67.457.3<0.00171.665.00.007
 Yes32.642.7<0.00128.435.00.007
Any contact with FLW during pregnancy, %
 No27.843.0<0.00135.737.9<0.001
 Yes72.257.0<0.00164.362.1<0.001
Any contact with FLW within 7 days of delivery, %
 No58.154.80.24355.848.20.282
 Yes41.945.20.24344.251.80.282
  • Differences in groups at baseline and endline were tested by using ordinary least-squares regression models (continuous variables) or logit regression models (categorical variables), adjusting for clustering effect at the block and village level.