Characteristics of progression criteria reported in external randomised pilot trial publications
Completed (n=37) n (%) | Protocol (n=123) n (%) | Total (n=160) n (%) | |
Feasibility outcomes informing progression criteria | |||
All | 14 (38) | 39 (32) | 53 (33) |
Some | 22 (59) | 77 (63) | 99 (62) |
None | 1 (3) | 2 (2) | 3 (2) |
Unclear* | 0 (0) | 5 (4) | 5 (3) |
Reported process for establishing progression criteria | |||
Who decided on progression criteria | |||
Reported | 4 (11) | 8 (6) | 12 (8) |
Not reported | 33 (89) | 115 (94) | 148 (93) |
Rationale for progression criteria | |||
Reported for all progression criteria | 8 (22) | 20 (16) | 28 (18) |
Reported for some criteria only | 4 (11) | 12 (10) | 16 (10) |
Not reported | 25 (68) | 91 (74) | 116 (73) |
Progression criteria format | |||
Research method informing progression criteria | |||
Quantitative | 32 (86) | 93 (76) | 125 (78) |
Quantitative and qualitative (mixed methods) | 5 (14) | 29 (24) | 34 (21) |
Unclear | 0 (0) | 1 (1) | 1 (1) |
Qualitative research contribution | |||
Informs progression criteria | 5 (14) | 29 (24) | 34 (21) |
Does not inform progression criteria | 14 (38) | 60 (49) | 74 (46) |
Qualitative research methodology not used | 18 (49) | 34 (28) | 52 (33) |
Quantitative progression criteria target format | |||
Distinct threshold | 34 (92) | 99 (80) | 133 (83) |
Traffic light system | 2 (5) | 18 (15) | 20 (13) |
Other | 1 (3) | 6 (5) | 7 (4) |
Reported process for assessing progression criteria to inform the progression decision | |||
Process for progression decision-making | |||
Reported | 16 (43) | 58 (47) | 74 (46) |
Not reported | 21 (57) | 65 (53) | 86 (54) |
Who is involved in assessing progression criteria | |||
Reported | 5 (14) | 30 (24) | 35 (22) |
Not reported | 32 (86) | 93 (76) | 125 (78) |
Peer reviewer reports | |||
Progression criteria mentioned in peer reviewer report | |||
Yes | 19 (51) | 67 (54) | 86 (54) |
Peer review comment theme | |||
Progression criteria were not specified | 6 (32) | 29 (44) | 35 (41) |
Unclear whether progression criteria were specified | 1 (5) | 4 (6) | 5 (6) |
Progression criteria rationale or justification query | 5 (26) | 15 (22) | 20 (23) |
Other | 7 (37) | 19 (29) | 26 (30) |
No | 15 (41) | 52 (42) | 67 (42) |
Peer reviewer report unavailable | 3 (8) | 4 (3) | 7 (4) |
Percentages may not sum up to 100 due to rounding.
*Feasibility uncertainties are not completely defined in the objectives and outcomes; key methodological uncertainties have been identified from those stipulated in the progression criteria.