Criteria used in existing tools to inform a judgement of ‘high’ risk of bias due to selective non-reporting
‘High’ risk of bias criteria proposed in existing tools | AHRQ ORB | AHRQ RRB | AXIS | GRADE | QUIPS | RoB 1.0 | SYRCLE RoB | RoBANS | ORBIT-I | SAQAT | Reid | ORBIT-II | NMA-Quality | RTI 2012 | RTI 2013 | Total, n (%) |
Assessment directed at study as a whole | ||||||||||||||||
One or more outcomes of interest were clearly measured, but no results were reported | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 8 (53) | |||||||
One or more outcomes of interest were reported incompletely so that they could not be entered in a meta-analysis | ✓ | ✓ | 2 (13) | |||||||||||||
The study report fails to include results for a key outcome that would be expected to have been reported for such a study | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 5 (33) | ||||||||||
Assessment directed at a specific outcome | ||||||||||||||||
Particular outcome clearly measured but no results were reported | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 6 (40) | |||||||||
Particular outcome of interest is reported incompletely so that it cannot be entered in a meta-analysis (typically stating only that P>0.05) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 6 (40) | |||||||||
Judgement says particular outcome is likely to have been measured and analysed but not reported on the basis of its results | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 6 (40) | |||||||||
Composite outcomes are presented without the individual component outcomes | ✓ | ✓ | 2 (13) | |||||||||||||
Result reported globally across all groups | ✓ | 1 (7) | ||||||||||||||
Result reported for some groups only | ✓ | 1 (7) | ||||||||||||||
Data were not reported consistently for the outcome of interest | ✓ | 1 (7) | ||||||||||||||
Assessment directed at a specific synthesis | ||||||||||||||||
Selective non-reporting suspected in a number of included studies | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | 4 (27) |
AHRQ ORB, AHRQ outcome and analysis reporting bias framework28; AHRQ RRB, AHRQ tool for evaluating the risk of reporting bias29; AXIS, Appraisal tool for Cross-Sectional Studies30; GRADE, GRADE rating of quality of evidence34–37; NMA-Quality, Framework for evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis49; ORBIT-I, Outcome Reporting Bias In Trials classification system for benefit outcomes3 32; ORBIT-II, Outcome Reporting Bias In Trials classification system for harm outcomes48; QUIPS, Quality In Prognosis Studies tool38; Reid, Reid et al selective reporting bias algorithm47; RoB 1.0, Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomised trials21 39 40; RoBANS, Risk of Bias Assessment Tool for Nonrandomized Studies44; RTI 2012, RTI Item Bank for Assessment of Risk of Bias and Precision for Observational Studies of Interventions or Exposures51; RTI 2013, RTI Item Bank for Assessing Risk of Bias and Confounding for Observational Studies of Interventions or Exposures52; SAQAT, Semi-Automated Quality Assessment Tool45 46; SYRCLE RoB, SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation risk of bias tool.43