Table 3

Association between PCH approach (triage vs usual care) and children receiving PCH assessments on request and referral of these children to additional PCH assessments or to external services

Triage approachUsual approachp Value
n (%)n (%)
n=4050*n=4611*
Children receiving PCH assessment on request107 (2.6)27 (0.6)<0.01
n=107n=27
Referring parties†
 School18 (16.8)0 (0.0)0.02
 Parents18 (16.8)5 (18.5)0.78
 Well-child care33 (30.8)0 (0.0)0.01
 Other1 (0.9)1 (3.7)0.36
 Unknown37 (34.6)21 (77.8)<0.01
Referral to additional PCH assessment and/or external services62 (57.9)2 (7.4)<0.01
 Additional PCH assessment54 (50.5)0 (0.0)<0.01
 External services23 (21.5)2 (7.4)0.09
  • *All children (4–12 years) at the schools included.

  • †The five categories were tested separately. For example, the school as the referring party was tested relative to all categories as a reference to analyse differences between the triage and usual approaches.

  • Χ2 test/Fisher’s exact test.

  • PCH, Preventive Child Healthcare.