Table 5

GRADE analysis of group 1 measurement outcomes included in the quantitative synthesis

Quality assessment Summary of findings
OutcomeIncluded studies (design)ROBInconsistencyNo serious IndirectnessImprecisionPublication biasGroups (intervention/control)Effect size (direction)p Value95% CIQuality
Muscle strength (lower limb)(RCT)21 31 32 No serious ROBSerious inconsistency (substantial heterogeneity)No serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionUndetected^131/1350.98 (intervention)<0.00001(0.73 to 1.24)⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
TUG(RCT)21 32 No serious ROBNo serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessSerious imprecision (CIs crossline of no effect/ OIS not reached)Undetected^124/1250.37 (intervention)0.37(−0.68 to 0.26)⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
BMD (femoral neck)(RCT)21 32 No serious ROBNo serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessSerious imprecision (CIs crossline of no effect/ OIS not reached)Undetected^124/1250.02 (intervention)0.15(−0.01 to 0.05)⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
BMD (spine)(RCT)21 32 No serious ROBNo serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessSerious imprecision (CIs crossline of no effect/ OIS not reached)Undetected^124/1250.02 (intervention)0.41(−0.03 to 0.07)⊕⊕⊕○
Moderate
  • ^ Insufficient 

  • BMD, bone mineral density; RCT, randomised controlled trial; OIS, Optimal Information Size; ROB, Risk Of Bias.