You are here

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Volume 9, Issue 2
  • Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation

Article info

Article menu

Download PDFPDF

XML
Evidence based practice
Research
Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation

Authors

  • Qiukui Hao The Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics/ National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Tahira Devji Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Dena Zeraatkar Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Yuting Wang The Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics/ National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Anila Qasim Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Reed A C Siemieniuk Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Per Olav Vandvik Department of Medicine, Innlandet Hospital Trust-division, Gjøvik, Norway Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Tuomas Lähdeoja Finnish Center of Evidence Based Orthopaedics (FICEBO), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Alonso Carrasco-Labra Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Thomas Agoritsas Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Division of General Internal Medicine and Division of Epidemiology, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  • Gordon Guyatt Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada PubMed articlesGoogle scholar articles
  1. Correspondence to Dr Qiukui Hao; haoqiukui{at}gmail.com
View Full Text

Citation

Hao Q, Devji T, Zeraatkar D, et al
Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation
BMJ Open 2019;9:e028777. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028777

Publication history

  • Received December 26, 2018
  • Revised January 7, 2019
  • Accepted January 18, 2019
  • First published February 20, 2019.
Online issue publication 
January 10, 2022
Previous versions
Review history

Request permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Copyright information

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.