Article Text
Abstract
Acquired factor V (FV) inhibitors are extremely rare and present with a broad spectrum ranging from asymptomatic laboratory anomalies to life-threatening critical bleeds. The overall rarity along with the heterogeneity of clinical presentations poses a challenge in diagnosis. There is currently no standard of care immunosuppressive therapy (IST) in these settings. Most patients in the literature receive multiple agents, including but not limited to combinations of IST and/or recombinant products.
Here, we present a case of a man in his 50s who initially presented with oozing at peripheral IV and tracheostomy sites with intermittent epistaxis. He was later found to have an FV activity level of less than 1% and an FV inhibitor titre of 184 Bethesda units/mL. The patient was initially stabilised with fresh frozen plasma, platelets and tranexamic acid and treated with intravenous immunoglobulin and glucocorticoids. However, this resulted in only mild improvement in his coagulation studies. He was then treated with weekly doses of rituximab for 4 weeks with ongoing glucocorticoids without complications. This adds to the growing literature on rituximab as a possible treatment option for acquired FV inhibitors.
- Haematology (incl blood transfusion)
- Malignant and Benign haematology
- Haematology (drugs and medicines)
- Immunological products and vaccines
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors The following authors were responsible for drafting of the text, sourcing and editing of clinical images, investigation results, drawing original diagrams and algorithms, and critical revision for important intellectual content: FA, YL, UA and PK. The following authors gave final approval of the manuscript: FA, YL, UA and PK.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.