Question 2 Should carbon dioxide detectors be used to check correct placement of endotracheal tubes in preterm and term neonates?
=================================================================================================================================

* Harsha Gowda

## Scenario

The Pedi-Cap device (Covidien, Mansfield, Massachusetts, USA) is frequently used in neonatal resuscitation to check the position of the endotracheal (ET) tube in term and preterm neonates. As a paediatric trainee having worked in various regions of the UK you note a huge variability in this practice. Clinical assessment of chest expansion and air entry, with improvement in saturations, colour and heart rate have been used for decades and work well. Is the Pedi-Cap superior to clinical assessment for checking the position of the ET tube?

## Structured clinical question

During intubation of neonates [patients], is a carbon dioxide detector [intervention] better than clinical assessment [comparison] to detect correct endotracheal tube placement [outcome]?

## Search strategy and outcome

Medline (1948–April week 1, 2011) and Embase (1947–15 April 2011) using the Ovid interface and the Cochrane Library were searched using the search terms: Neonate/Newborn/Preterm/Infants/Babies AND Carbon dioxide detector/CO2 detector/Pedi-Cap/Capnography/End tidal CO2 AND Intubation/Endotracheal tube; limits: Humans.

The search of Medline yielded 41 articles and Embase yielded 43 articles (2 unique articles). No relevant reviews were found in the Cochrane Library.

Thirty-nine articles were excluded, leaving four well conducted prospective studies for review (table 2).

View this table:
[Table 2](http://adc.bmj.com/content/96/12/1201/T1)

Table 2 
Should carbon dioxide detectors be used to check correct placement of endotracheal tubes in preterm and term neonates?

There were no randomised controlled trials.

## Commentary

Proper placement of the ET tube during resuscitation can be difficult, especially in neonates, and evidence suggests a significant rate of oesophageal intubation when neonatal tracheal intubation is attempted: the rates of successful intubation at the first attempt vary from 24% in junior trainees to 86% in consultants.1 Direct laryngoscopy and observation of the ET tube passing between the vocal cords is the standard criterion for verifying ET intubation.2 Detection of end-tidal carbon dioxide, however, serves as a valuable adjunct to confirm ET intubation, detect inadvertent oesophageal intubation and monitor for accidental tracheal extubation.

Many studies have shown the colorimetric ETCO2 (end-tidal carbon dioxide) detector to be sensitive and specific in confirming ET intubation in haemodynamically stable adults and children.3 However, there has always been a concern that carbon dioxide in a neonatal small tidal volume may be diluted in the large dead space of the early versions of these detectors, resulting in false negative results (ie, indicating oesophageal placement despite the correct intratracheal position of the ET tube). Therefore, a specific paediatric disposable colorimetric ETCO2 detector (Pedi-Cap) with an internal volume of 3 ml is used during neonatal intubation.4

In direct comparisons in adults, capnography was superior to clinical assessment but no single technique was perfect, and capnography was found to be less accurate in cardiac arrest.5 In paediatric patients weighing more than 2 kg and with spontaneous circulation, detection of exhaled carbon dioxide confirmed tracheal tube position in all cases, but during cardiac arrest the possibility of a false negative result required further confirmation of tracheal tube position.6

Four good quality neonatal studies4 7 10 11 found that capnography/Pedi-Cap identified tracheal tube position more rapidly than clinical assessment. In all studies direct visualisation of tracheal tube position (or clinical assessment) was used as the final ‘gold standard’. Hosono *et al* compared capnography with defined clinical assessments. Capnography was completely accurate in all babies studied, all of whom had spontaneous circulation and were less than 32 weeks gestation. This study also had a well defined method for defining tracheal tube position.7 All studies utilised a separate team to measure exhaled carbon dioxide, with the clinical team blinded to the measurements, and all four examined neonates with spontaneous circulation. Several cases of false negatives in neonates as well as false negatives occurring in adult and paediatric cardiac arrest have been reported.8 Therefore, capnography should be interpreted carefully in extremely small neonates or in those in whom extensive resuscitation is required.

All studies showed that detection of exhaled carbon dioxide confirms tracheal intubation in neonates with a cardiac output more rapidly and more accurately than clinical assessment alone. False negatives may occur in very low birthweight neonates and in those in cardiac arrest.8 False positives may occur in the presence of colorimetric devices contaminated with epinephrine (adrenaline), surfactant or atropine.9 There is no comparative information to recommend any one method for the detection of exhaled carbon dioxide in the neonatal population. It appears important to use ETCO2 detection during neonatal intubation.

### Clinical bottom line

*   ▶ Detection of exhaled carbon dioxide confirms tracheal intubation in neonates with a cardiac output more rapidly and more accurately than clinical assessment alone. (Grade B)

*   ▶ False negatives may occur in neonates with cardiac arrest. (Grade C)

*   ▶ It is unclear if false positives occur with colorimetric devices contaminated with epinephrine, surfactant or atropine. (Grade D)

## Acknowledgments

The author would like to thank Dr Bob Phillips for reviewing the manuscript and providing valuable suggestions.

## Footnotes

*   Competing interests None.

*   Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

This paper is freely available online under the BMJ Journals unlocked scheme, see [http://adc.bmj.com/info/unlocked.dtl](http://adc.bmj.com/info/unlocked.dtl)

## References

1.  O'Donnell CP, Kamlin CO, Davis PG, et al. Endotracheal intubation attempts during neonatal resuscitation: success rates, duration, and adverse effects. Pediatrics 2006;117:e16–21.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTA6InBlZGlhdHJpY3MiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiMTE3LzEvZTE2IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6Mjk6Ii9hcmNoZGlzY2hpbGQvOTYvMTIvMTIwMS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

2.  Birmingham PK, Cheney FW, Ward RJ. Esophageal intubation: a review of detection techniques. Anesth Analg 1986;65:886–91.
    
    [PubMed](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3089066&link_type=MED&atom=%2Farchdischild%2F96%2F12%2F1201.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1986D296600012&link_type=ISI) 

3.  Sutherland PD, Quinn M. Nellcor Stat Cap differentiates oesophageal from tracheal intubation. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1995;73:F184–6.
    
    [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTM6ImZldGFsbmVvbmF0YWwiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiNzMvMy9GMTg0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6Mjk6Ii9hcmNoZGlzY2hpbGQvOTYvMTIvMTIwMS5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 

4.  Aziz HF, Martin JB, Moore JJ. The pediatric disposable end-tidal carbon dioxide detector role in endotracheal intubation in newborns. J Perinatol 1999;19:110–13.
    
    [CrossRef](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/sj.jp.7200136&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10642970&link_type=MED&atom=%2Farchdischild%2F96%2F12%2F1201.atom) 

5.  Grmec S. Comparison of three different methods to confirm tracheal tube placement in emergency intubation. Intensive Care Med 2002;28:701–4.
    
    [CrossRef](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1007/s00134-002-1290-x&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=12107674&link_type=MED&atom=%2Farchdischild%2F96%2F12%2F1201.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000176803000006&link_type=ISI) 

6.  Bhende MS, Thompson AE, Cook DR, et al. Validity of a disposable end-tidal CO2 detector in verifying endotracheal tube placement in infants and children. Ann Emerg Med 1992;21:142–5.
    
    [PubMed](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=1739199&link_type=MED&atom=%2Farchdischild%2F96%2F12%2F1201.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1992HB58000006&link_type=ISI) 

7.  Hosono S, Inami I, Fujita H, et al. A role of end-tidal CO(2) monitoring for assessment of tracheal intubations in very low birth weight infants during neonatal resuscitation at birth. J Perinat Med 2009;37:79–84.
    
    [CrossRef](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1515/JPM.2009.017&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18976048&link_type=MED&atom=%2Farchdischild%2F96%2F12%2F1201.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000263658800014&link_type=ISI) 

8.  Kamlin CO, O'Donnell CP, Davis PG, et al. Colorimetric end-tidal carbon dioxide detectors in the delivery room: strengths and limitations. A case report. J Pediatr 2005;147:547–8.
    
    [CrossRef](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jpeds.2005.05.014&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16227046&link_type=MED&atom=%2Farchdischild%2F96%2F12%2F1201.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000232865300029&link_type=ISI) 

9.  Hughes SM, Blake BL, Woods SL, et al. False-positive results on colorimetric carbon dioxide analysis in neonatal resuscitation: potential for serious patient harm. J Perinatol 2007;27:800–1.
    
    [CrossRef](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/sj.jp.7211831&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18034166&link_type=MED&atom=%2Farchdischild%2F96%2F12%2F1201.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000251265000013&link_type=ISI) 

10. Repetto JE, Donohue PA-C PK, Baker SF, et al. Use of capnography in the delivery room for assessment of endotracheal tube placement. J Perinatol 2001;21:284–7.
    
    [CrossRef](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/sj.jp.7210534&link_type=DOI) 
    
    [PubMed](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=11536020&link_type=MED&atom=%2Farchdischild%2F96%2F12%2F1201.atom) 

11. Roberts WA, Maniscalco WM, Cohen AR, et al. The use of capnography for recognition of esophageal intubation in the neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Pulmonol 1995;19:262–8.
    
    [PubMed](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=7567200&link_type=MED&atom=%2Farchdischild%2F96%2F12%2F1201.atom) 
    
    [Web of Science](http://adc.bmj.com/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995RG32300003&link_type=ISI)