Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Paediatric family activation rapid response (FARR) in acute care: a qualitative study for developing a multilingual application (app) intervention
  1. Takawira C Marufu1,2,
  2. Nicola Taylor1,
  3. Shannon Cresham Fox1,
  4. Emma Popejoy1,2,
  5. Rachel Boardman1,
  6. Joseph C Manning1,2
  1. 1 Nottingham Children's Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
  2. 2 School of Healthcare, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
  1. Correspondence to Professor Joseph C Manning; Joseph.Manning{at}leicester.ac.uk

Abstract

Background Delayed recognition of clinical deterioration can result in harm to patients. Parents/carers can often recognise changes in the child’s condition before healthcare professionals (HCPs). To mitigate the risk of failure to rescue and promote early intervention, family-activated rapid response (FARR) systems are part of family-integrated care. Mechanisms for parents/carers to escalate concerns regarding their child’s clinical status remain limited to direct verbal communication, which may impede those with communication/linguistic challenges.

Aim To develop a digital multilingual intervention by which families/carers can escalate their concerns directly to the rapid response team while in acute paediatric care.

Methods A single-centre qualitative, co-design app development study was conducted. Evidence synthesis from a systematic review of the international literature informed interviews on intervention prototype development using co-design focus groups. Participant recruitment targeted underserved communities for multilingual functionality validity. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis.

Results Thirty parents/carers (n=16) and HCPs (n=14) participated in the study. Three themes were generated from the data analysis: (1) relational considerations; communication, professional and parental attributes, and collaborative working; (2) technology considerations; app content, usage and outcomes; and (3) individual and environmental considerations; parental and professional elements, and workload. A FARR app prototype was developed based on the data.

Conclusion The prototype app provides a platform to develop a coordinated and consistent technological approach to paediatric FARR that acknowledges cultural nuances and preferences, ensuring that parents can communicate in a manner that aligns with their cultural background and communication abilities, thereby enhancing the quality of care delivered.

  • Paediatrics
  • Qualitative research
  • Paediatric Emergency Medicine
  • Nursing
  • Emergency Care

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • X @takamarufu, @josephcmanning

  • Contributors Study conceptualisation, design and delivery: NT, TCM, SCF, JCM. Manuscript writing: TCM, SCF, NT, EP, RB, JCM. Critical revisions for important intellectual content: TCM, EP, NT, JCM. All authors agreed on the publication of the manuscript. TM guarantor.

  • Funding The study was funded by Oracle Cerner, American Nurses Credential Centre (ANCC) Pathway to Excellence® Accreditation (no award/grant number), and the CRN East Midlands Underserved Communities funding 22/23 (UF49). NT and TCM are the co-chief investigators.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.