Use of Venous Excess UltraSound (VExUS) score in hyponatraemia management in critically ill patient
- Rita Varudo ,
- Inês Pimenta ,
- Jacobo Bacariza Blanco and
- Filipe André Gonzalez
- Intensive Care Department, Hospital Garcia de Orta EPE, Almada, Portugal
- Correspondence to Dr Filipe André Gonzalez; filipeandregonzalez@gmail.com
Abstract
Hyponatraemia is the most prevalent electrolyte disorder in the neurocritical care setting and is associated with a significant morbimortality. Cerebral salt wasting and inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion syndrome have been classically described as the two most frequent entities responsible for hyponatraemia in neurocritical care patients. An accurate aetiological diagnosis of hypotonic hyponatraemia requires a proper volume status assessment. Nevertheless, determination of volume status based on physical examination, laboratory findings and imaging modalities have several limitations and can lead to improperly diagnosis and hyponatraemia mismanagement. Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), specifically Venous Excess UltraSound (VExUS) score, is a fast and valuable tool to evaluate venous congestion at the bedside and identify hypervolaemia, helping the physicians in therapeutic decision making in a patient with hyponatraemia. We report a case where the use of POCUS, and more specifically VExUS, can be helpful in volume status assessment, complementing the complex management of multifactorial hyponatraemia in a neurocritical patient.
Background
Hyponatraemia is the most frequent electrolyte disturbance identified in the intensive care unit (ICU),1 representing a decreased sodium concentration below 135 mmol/L.2 Moreover, hyponatraemia may negatively impacts patients’ outcomes in the ICU setting. This is why it should not be dismissed in the neurocritical care patient because even small decreases in serum sodium level can lead to severe prognosis limitation.1 Finally, hyponatraemia management also represents a real challenge for physicians in general since severe complications can occur with either under or overcorrection of sodium levels.2
Excluding pseudohyponatraemia and hypertonic hyponatraemia is one of the primordial stages which aid identifying the cause of hyponatraemia.2
Hypotonic hyponatraemia can be triggered either by an extreme loss of sodium and other electrolytes or by an increasement in free water resulting in fewer total osmoles relative to blood volume.2 In these cases, plasma and urine osmolality comparisons are paramount,1 the same as the urine and serum sodium and the uric acid levels. All of them can demonstrate signs concerning diuretic use and antidiuretic hormone status.2 Altogether with these laboratory analysis, the essential diagnostic step consists on evaluating the patient’s volume status to categorise hyponatraemia as hypovolaemic, euvolaemic or hypervolaemic, to treat the disorder appropriately.2–4
In critical patients, precise assessment of volume status is complex, and analytical or clinical parameters alone often do not suffice.2 3 Central venous pressure (CVP) measurements in the ICU setting remain invasive, and previous studies showed a poor correlation between the real volume status and the CVP.5 6 Variables such as cumulative fluid balance or the development of peripheral oedema have significant limitations, and their relationship with systemic venous pressure is not usually proportional.2 6
In the last years, ultrasound has been used to improve the evaluation of volume status, particularly with point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) by acute care physicians as an complement to physical examination and decision making at the bedside.2 6 7 In cases of systemic congestion, the increased volume lead to a rise in venous pressures. POCUS enables the clinicians to estimate systemic venous pressure using Doppler evaluation.6 7 Several possible indicators of volume overload and congestive process has been proposed in the literature,8 among them, the Venous Excess UltraSound score (VExUS), which was developed to detect venous congestion in the presence of a plethoric inferior vena cava, using Doppler evaluation of the hepatic vein, portal vein and intrarenal vein.7
The present case highlights the use of POCUS—and specifically VExUS—as a powerful adjunct to physical examination and laboratory evaluation to improve volume status assessment and as a useful tool in the differential diagnosis of hyponatraemia as in clinical decision making on a neurocritical patient.
Case presentation
A female in her late teens presented to the emergency department after being run over, resulting in a closed-skull traumatic brain injury. At the arrival of the prehospital emergency team, she had an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 4, and endotracheal intubation was performed. In the emergency department, the head CT scan showed skull base and bilateral orbital floor fractures, an acute subdural haematoma in the right frontotemporoparietal region, a traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage, multiple cerebral contusions, and diffuse cerebral oedema. In addition, CT studies showed a sternal fracture and right lung contusion.
An intraparenchymal fibreoptic catheter was placed to measure the intracranial pressure (ICP), and she was transferred to the ICU. An arterial line and central venous catheters were placed for haemodynamic monitoring, fluid and medication management. Later, an intravenous isotonic solution at 80 mL/hour was started. Norepinephrine was begun to maintain cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in 70–75 mm Hg. She also received deep sedation and analgesia, same as prophylactic anticonvulsant therapy.
On hospital day 3, the patient’s ICP reached 24 mm Hg and was temporarily controlled with increased sedation and hypertonic sodium solution. Afterwards, a repeated CT head scan revealed the worsening of the right subdural haemorrhage and diffuse cerebral oedema. Subsequently, the patient was taken to the operating room, and a right-sided decompressive craniectomy was performed. Of note, intravenous mannitol administration for ICP control was needed. Postoperatively, the patient did not need hyperosmolar therapy again, with the ICP remaining within the normal range. The head CT scan showed no complications, and weaning from intravenous sedative medications was started. Due to an enteral feeding intolerance, the flow rate of continuous enteral nutrition was reduced, and she remained with 1000 mL/day of intravenous isotonic solution.
On day 6, blood analysis was notable for acute hyponatraemia, with serum sodium of 128 mmol/L, and no other electrolyte disorders (serum potassium of 3.8 mmol/L).
Investigations
Her urine sodium was 175 mmol/L (normal value: 50–133), urine potassium 10.1 mmol/L (normal value: 20–67) and urine osmolality 445 mOsm/kg (normal value: 300–900) (figure 1). Her fluid balance on the day of onset hyponatraemia was neutral, with spontaneous diuresis, and she had preserved renal function (serum creatinine of 0.4 mg/dL and serum urea of 12 mg/dL) and no peripheral oedema. Her pulmonary auscultation was symmetrical without adventitious sounds, and she remained on mechanical ventilation with a FiO2 requirement of 25%. The patient remained sedated, requiring low-dose norepinephrine (0.1 mcg/kg/min) to maintain adequate CPP. A cerebral salt wasting syndrome (CSW) was presumed as a possible cause of hypotonic hyponatraemia. She was treated with fludrocortisone 0.2 mg/day and isotonic solution at 40 mL/hour. However, there was a worsening of the hyponatraemia, with serum sodium decreasing to 118 mg/dL. Blood analysis also revealed albumin of 2.9 g/dL, haematocrit of 27%, and urea of 15 mg/dL. Her serum osmolality was 260 mOsm/kg (normal value: 275–295), urine sodium was 130 mmol/L, urine potassium 29 mmol/L and urine osmolality 583 mOsm/kg. Although the cumulative fluid balance was positive by more than 7 L, her daily fluid balance was now slightly negative (−267 mL/24 hours) with spontaneous diuresis, and she had no peripheral oedema. The isotonic solution was replaced by 3% saline solution perfusion.
Laboratory data, urine output and fluid balance from day 6 to 10. Echographic evaluation was performed at days 8 and 10.
Differential diagnosis
CSW and syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH) have been defined as the most common causes of hyponatraemia in the neurocritical patient. The differential diagnosis between CSW and SIADH in critical patients is often challenging since the physical examination is limited, there are multiple confounding factors (fluid administration, medications such as mannitol), and laboratory analysis information is commonly confusing. Classically, hypovolaemia has been regarded as the factor that enables differentiating CSW, although this is difficult to diagnose in the neurocritical setting.9 In our case, acute hypotonic hyponatraemia with increased natriuresis and physical examination with no peripheral oedema or other signs suggestive of hypervolaemia was assumed to be in a hypovolaemic context, suggesting CSW. Despite treatment with fludrocortisone and 0.9% saline solution, serum sodium values continued to decrease, raising suspicions about hyponatraemia aetiology and, at this point, suggesting SIADH.
Dysfunction of the hypothalamic–hypophyseal–adrenal axis is also common in patients with severe traumatic brain injury, and hypopituitarism is frequent in young patients, as well as in those to whom etomidate, propofol, or phenobarbital have been administered. Although the patient was young and under sedation with propofol and cortisol level measurement was not required, there was no hypoglycaemic, and she remained under low-dose vasopressor to maintain adequate CPP. Although pain can be another potential stimulus for ADH release, adequate analgesia was achieved using a multimodal approach.
Hyponatraemia can also be secondary to the use of certain drugs, such as mannitol. In this case, the development of hyponatraemia occurred several days after mannitol administration for ICP control.
Treatment
In view of this situation, considering the presumed mismanagement of hyponatraemia and the presence of multiple confounding factors, POCUS was performed by an intensive care physician to adequately assess the patient’s volume status. A cardiac evaluation revealed preserved biventricular systolic function (cardiac output of 3 L/min, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral of 21 cm, stroke volume of 48 mL, E/A 1.7, E/E’ 9.6, TAPSE 19 mm, tricuspid S’ 13 cm/s, RV-RA gradient of 21 mm Hg, no interventricular septal flattening). Lung ultrasound showed bilateral normal A pattern and no pleural effusion. The evaluation of systemic venous congestion was performed using the VExUS score. Her inferior vena cava appeared with a maximum diameter of 21 mm and a distensibility index of 33% (figure 2A). Hepatic vein Doppler showed systolic (S) and diastolic (D) forward flow waves but with S component lower in magnitude than the D component (figure 2B). Portal vein showed 53% pulsatility (figure 2C), and renal Doppler showed a biphasic interrupted intra-renal venous flow (figure 2D). The overall VExUS pattern was grade 2, denoting moderate venous congestion (figure 3). The ultrasound findings supported hypervolaemia conditioning a change in hyponatraemia management and therapy. As a result, intravenous furosemide was started, and her diuretic response and serum sodium were closely monitored. Intermittent 3% hypertonic saline solution was administered to increase natraemia in the first hours. The ICU team closely monitored blood and urine sodium levels and diuresis to avoid overcorrection, aiming to obtain a sodium improvement of less than 10 mmol in 24 hours and less than 18 mmol over 48 hours.1 After 24 hours of strategy change and negative fluid balance, sodium had increased 10 mmol (118–128 mmol/L). Consequently, a continuous 3% hypertonic saline solution was started, and occasional furosemide boluses were performed to maintain negative fluid balance. Sodium was corrected at an appropriate rate, with a total increase of 13 mmol (119–132 mmol/L) in 48 hours. Over the same period, portal vein pulsatility decreased until it was approximately 30% (figure 4A), and the hepatic vein Doppler got to a normal pattern with S>D forward flow (figure 4B). Given the sodium decreasing whenever hypertonic saline was stopped, continuous infusion of 3% saline solution was maintained and serum sodium continued to improve in the following days.
Initial VExUS evaluation performed at day 7: (A) IVC long axis showing dilated IVC (21 mm) with distensibility index of 33%. (B) Hepatic vein Doppler with S<D forward flow waves. (C) Portal vein Doppler showing 53% pulsatility. (D) Intrarenal venous Doppler showing discontinuous biphasic flow with systolic and diastolic phases. VExUS, Venous Excess UltraSound. IVC, Inferior Vena Cava
VExUS grading system. Retrieved from https://nephropocus.com/2021/10/05/vexus-flash-cards/ with copyright permission from the author Koratala A. VExUS, Venous Excess UltraSound. IVC, Inferior Vena Cava.
VExUS evaluation after 2 days of therapeutic strategy change (day 9): (A) hepatic vein Doppler improved to S>D forward flow waves. (B) Portal vein pulsatility decreased to 30%. VExUS, Venous Excess UltraSound.
Outcome and follow-up
The patient’s GCS improved during her ICU stay, giving leading to mechanical ventilation weaning. However, after two failed extubation attempts due to postextubation stridor, a percutaneous tracheostomy was performed. There was a respiratory deterioration due to ventilator-associated pneumonia with acute respiratory distress syndrome during the ICU stay. After the bacterial infection was resolved, GCS improved, and she was successfully weaned from the ventilator and maintained with oxygen supply by tracheostomy. After 53 days in the ICU, she was discharged to the department of neurosurgery with GCS 10 (E4, V1, M5), where she remained after that.
Discussion
In patients with acute brain injury, hyponatraemia is associated with ADH-mediated water retention and urinary sodium losses, so CSW and SIADH were considered potential causes of hypotonic hyponatraemia. The differential diagnosis between CSW and SIADH is paramount since opposite therapeutic strategies should be applied to these two conditions (free water restriction vs fluid therapy, respectively).3 However, since both inappropriate increased natriuresis and brain injury are present in SIADH and CSW, assessment of extracellular volume is an essential component to differentiate the two etiologies of hyponatraemia.
Besides the difficulty on distinguishing these two syndromes and choosing the best therapeutic option, as we have shown in this case, the assessment of hyponatraemia may be seriously confounded by some standard medical treatments used in management of neurocritical patients, such as the use of norepinephrine to maintain CPP which may lead to pressure-diuresis. Consequently, due to increased mean arterial pressure, an elevated natriuresis occur10 and lead to reduced extracellular volume. Moreover, the potentially excessive salt administration through salt-containing intravenous fluids to these patients might manipulate blood and extracellular volumes; in our case, this contaminated the laboratory results and clinical evaluation, making the presentation of a classic SIADH or CSW picture less likely than when they were described in the literature.10
The case reported portrays the complexities and limitations of clinical features, imaging, and laboratory findings on volume status evaluation while managing hyponatraemia. Physical examination and laboratory findings can be confounding and influenced by multiple previous interventions, as in this case in which the need for vasopressor, lack of lower extremity oedema and clinical respiratory changes inappropriately supported a non-hypervolaemic status, and sodium failed to normalise with saline solution.
POCUS is a powerful, time-efficient and non-invasive tool to assess physiology at the bedside and allows the clinician to recognise the venous congestion.6 In this case, POCUS, and more specifically VExUS, was highly useful in the volume status assessment and assisting in clinical decision making, therapy guidance, and finally, hyponatraemia control. POCUS with VExUS scoring primary focus to identify a dilated IVC. However, this dilation means poorly on the volume status evaluation since IVC can be influenced for multiple conditions in critically ill patients. So, when IVC is dilated, the clinician moves from the cava vein towards the hepatic vein, portal vein and intrarenal vein to complete the appraisal. As a result, we obtain the VExUS score, and with this score, we get to a more accurate view of the absolute volume status.7 Each of these veins is evaluated and assigned to either normal, mildly congested or severely congested.7 The hepatic vein Doppler waveform is considered mildly abnormal when the systolic wave is lower in magnitude than the diastolic wave, while the presence of reversed systolic wave (towards the heart) is considered severely abnormal.6 Portal Doppler is considered abnormal when there is a pulsatile waveform, being mildly abnormal when a variation in the velocities during the cardiac cycle is between 30% and 50% and severely abnormal if the variation is over 50%. Intrarenal venous Doppler is considered mildly abnormal when it is discontinuous with an S and D phase, while it is considered severely abnormal when it is discontinuous with only a diastolic phase seen during the cardiac cycle.6 VExUS grade 0 is related with no sign of congestion in any organ, VExUS grade 1 is with only mild congestive findings, VExUS grade 2 is with severe findings in only one organ and VExUS grade 3 is with severe congestive findings in at least 2 of 3 organ systems (figure 3).7 11
In this case, the hepatic vein Doppler showed a systolic phase that was of lesser amplitude than the diastolic phase, so it was considered as a mildly abnormal pattern. For the portal vein Doppler, a pulsatility fraction of >50% was considered severely abnormal. The intrarenal venous Doppler showed a discontinuous biphasic flow, so considered mildly abnormal. These findings correspond to a VExUS grade 2, which denotes moderate venous congestion and are consistent with hypervolaemia. These meaningful insights about patient volume status were of paramount relevance as they led to an active fluid offloading strategy, rather than maintaining the saline infusion, to obtain a negative fluid balance in this hypervolaemic context. Additionally, intermittent hypertonic saline solution with a higher concentration than urine was used to keep control of natraemia decreasing. VExUS score also helps physicians to monitor in real-time the therapeutic strategy effectiveness. As soon as the negative fluid balance was achieved, hepatic, portal vein Doppler patterns and serum sodium improved.
As an inapparent hypervolaemic state was brought to light by POCUS, this was likely a congestive heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction-like scenario behaving as dilutional hyponatraemia. A few more cases of venous doppler ultrasound management of dilutional hyponatraemia have been described.4 12 13 In patients with HF, hyponatraemia occurs more frequently in an impaired water excretion context than due to sodium depletion. There are two pivotal mechanisms involved in water retention and dilutional hyponatraemia worsening: increased nonosmotic release of arginine vasopressin (AVP) and insufficient tubular flow through diluting (distal) segments of the nephron.14 Moreover, in a rat model of renal congestion it was described an upregulation of aquaporin-2 expression,15 which would be expected to increase water permeability and reabsorption in the collecting ducts of the nephron. There can be a temptation about speculating that both mechanisms are causally associated and promote excessive free water reabsorption, leading to hyponatraemia in HF. The decreased effective circulatory volume in patients with acute decompensated HF lead to an increase in baroreceptor activity, sympathetic overdrive, and angiotensin II, which promote nonosmotic AVP release, as well as an increase the sensitivity of osmotic AVP release. In contrast to this osmotic AVP release, which increases linearly and with minimal changes in serum osmolality, nonosmotic AVP release is exponential.14 Considering this physiopathology helps understand why this patient needed both hypertonic saline to increase distal nephrons sodium concentration and the loop diuretic to assist natriuresis and induce an AVP resistance state.
In conclusion, we present a case where the use of POCUS, and more specifically VExUS, could be helpful in volume status assessment, complementing the complex management of multifactorial hyponatraemia in a neurocritical patient.
Learning points
-
Hyponatraemia management in neurocritical patients is challenging, and sodium level improvement should be closely monitored.
-
Physical examination and laboratory findings can be confounding and influenced by multiple factors leading to inadequate conclusions about volume status in these patients.
-
The concept of ‘volume status’ remains a challenge for clinicians due to the limitations of physical examination in critical patients.
-
Point-of-care ultrasound, and specifically Venous Excess UltraSound score, are powerful tools in assessing systemic venous congestion and can be helpful in clinical decision making in a patient with hyponatraemia, guiding proper therapy and monitoring therapeutic effectiveness.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Acknowledgments
We thank Dr Vânia Brito and Dr Antero Fernandes, Assistant Physician and Head of Intensive Care Department of Hospital Garcia de Orta, respectively, for the incentive to write the paper.
Footnotes
-
Contributors All authors contributed to the writing of the article and were involved with the patient’s care. RV was responsible for conception of the article, revising intellectual content and drafting of the manuscript. IP contributed to writing of the initial draft. JBB participated in planning, development and design of the article. FAG contributed to revising and preparation of the final manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer