Omalizumab-associated eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: cause or coincidence?
- Luke Nessan Carson ,
- Ashish Pradhan and
- Deepak Subramanian
- Respiratory Medicine, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
- Correspondence to Dr Luke Nessan Carson; luke.carson1@nhs.net
Abstract
Omalizumab is an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody used in severe allergic asthma. Herein, we describe a case of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, which manifested 3 months after initiation of omalizumab therapy, while maintenance corticosteroid therapy dose was unchanged.
Background
Omalizumab is a recombinant monoclonal antibody that binds circulating IgE and is an effective treatment option for severe allergic asthma. Eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EPGA) is a rare vasculitis, affecting small to medium-sized vessels, the clinical features can include asthma, eosinophilia and pulmonary infiltrates.1 An association between omalizumab and EGPA has been recognised; however, it remains unclear whether this treatment may have a causative or, conversely, a therapeutic role in EPGA.
This case report describes the development of cardiac involvement in EGPA after commencing omalizumab.
Case presentation
A 60-year-old man presented acutely with global weakness, altered sensation and a progressive petechial rash on his lower limbs. Prior to his admission, he had presented to his general practitioner with transient left eye ptosis and unilateral arm weakness. This had been preceded by a 2-month history of night sweats and lethargy.
He had a known history of severe asthma, two unprovoked pulmonary emboli, nasal polyposis, hypertension and poststreptococcal glomerulonephritis from which he had recovered fully. He had been commenced on omalizumab therapy for severe asthma 10 weeks prior to the admission and had not reported any worsening of his respiratory symptoms.
He was diagnosed with asthma in his 20s, controlled with salbutamol therapy and subsequently a steroid inhaler in his thirties. After turning 40, his asthma became more difficult to control, he was exacerbating more than four times a year and was referred to our local severe asthma service in 2015.
Baseline results at the time of referral included an IgE level of 257 kU/L, IgE to house dust mite 43.2 kU/L (grade 4), antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) negative, eosinophils 1.37 109/L, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) 45 ppb. His inhaled therapy was optimised and a trial of a leukotriene receptor antagonist was commenced, which showed some initial benefit, but this was not a lasting effect and was subsequently discontinued. Due to the frequent exacerbations and the impact on his quality of life at the time of referral, the decision was made with the patient to commence low-dose maintenance oral corticosteroid therapy (5 mg prednisolone/day), which was started in 2016. He initially had a good response to maintenance steroids with an improvement in his day-to-day asthma control; however, in 2017, he had five exacerbations requiring 40 mg prednisone each time. His case was discussed at our regional severe asthma MDT, and the outcome was to start a 16 week trial of omalizumab at a dose of 600 mg every 4 weeks and to change over to mepolizumab if the trial was unsuccessful. At the start of the trial, his ACQ-7 (asthma control questionnaire) was 0.9 and eosinophil count 0.62 109/L.
Ten days after receiving his first dose of omalizumab, the patient reported feeling light headed and noted that his pulse was irregular. He attended his GP practice and was diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (see figure 1) and commenced on a calcium channel blocker with a plan for an outpatient echocardiogram and cardiology review. He received two further doses of omalizumab prior to the admission, 10 weeks following the start of treatment. He did not experience any asthma exacerbations requiring an increase in his baseline steroids dose during this time. On admission, examination revealed reduced right upper and left upper limb power (4/5) and in the left and right lower limb (between 3 and 4/5). Altered sensation in L5/S1 dermatomes was also noted. There was no joint swelling observed. Auscultation of his chest was clear.
ECG on presentation showing atrial fibrillation.

Blood results revealed a troponin 403 ng/L (normal range 0–13), creatine kinase 870 IU/L (24–195 IU/L) and eosinophils 6.85×109/L.
To investigate the cause of the elevated cardiac biomakers and ECG findings, an echocardiography was performed. This demonstrated a severely dilated left atrium, global hypokinesis of the left ventricle and a severely impaired ejection fraction of approximately 33%. A dilated right atrium with mild tricuspid regurgitation was also noted.
The neurological findings and eosinophilia found on admission prompted a vasculitic process to be considered as part of the differential diagnosis, and autoimmune testing for ANCA, antinuclear antibodies and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies were performed and were negative. A CT scan of his chest abdomen and pelvis revealed no malignancy to explain his presenation. He was reviewed by the local rheumatology, neurology, cardiology and respiratory team; a clinical diagnosis of ANCA-negative EGPA was agreed on.
Investigations
A chest X-ray on admisison (figure 2) revealed a raised left hemidiaphragm, which was not present on chest X-ray 2 months previously. CT thorax (figure 3) revealed no ground-glass changes, small bilateral effusions, left lower lobe atelectasis and a raised left hemidiaphragm. There were no endobronchial secretions or lesions to account for this latter finding and clinically it was thought to be secondary to left phrenic nerve palsy secondary to EGPA and the small bilateral effusions attributed to his cardiac failure.
Initial chest X-ray on admission showing a raised left hemidiaphragm (note lung apex was not within the field of view).

Coronal CT chest image showing a raised left hemidiaphragm and left basal atelectasis.

A cardiac MRI (figure 4) performed later showed subepicardial and diffuse myocardial fibrosis on the basalo mid inferolarteral wall resulting in global hypokinesia more pronounced in the basal inferolateral wall. Moderate left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction 42%) as well as mild concentric left ventricular hypertrophy was noted. Aortic root dimensions were normal and moderate tricuscipd regurgitation and severe right atrial dilatation were identified. The features were in keeping with an eosinophilic myocarditis.
Cardiac MRI showing subepicardial and diffuse myocardial fibrosis on the basalo mid inferolarteral wall.

Nerve conduction studies were performed, which showed a decrease in sensory and motor response of the lower limbs with asymmetry in the amplitude in the ulnar nerve distribution, consistent with findings of mononeuritis multiplex. Muscle biopsy was inconclusive for a diagnosis of EGPA.
Differential diagnosis
An initial clinical impression of cervical myelopathy was made and an MRI brain and spine were performed. His MRI brain was reported as normal. An MRI spine showed large central C5–6 disc herniation causing encroachment on the spinal canal changes thought to be long standing and could have been due to chronic venous congestion associated with cervical canal stenosis.
In the lumbar area, degenerative spondylolistheses were observed at the L5–S1 level associated with significant L5–S1 disc bulging, which was causing compression of the L5 nerve roots bilaterally.
The 2012 Revised International Chapel Hill Consensus Conference Nomenclature of Vasculitides defines EGPA as an ‘eosinophil-rich and necrotizing granulomatous inflammation often involving the respiratory tract and necrotising vasculitis predominantly affecting small to medium vessels and associated with asthma and eosinophilia. Nasal polyps are common. ANCA is more frequent when glomerulonephritis is present… Granulomatous and nongranulomatous extravascular inflammation, such as nongranulomatous eosinophil-rich inflammation of lungs, myocardium, and gastrointestinal tract, is common’.2 Prior to initiation of omalizumab only asthma and nasal polyposis were present; but following its initiation multisystem involvement (including neurological, cardiological and systemic upset) then developed, suggesting this to be a likely trigger for his condition.
Treatment
He was commenced on a 5-day course of intravenous methyprednisolone followed by a weaning protocol of prednisolone from 60 mg to 15 mg in a 3-month period. This is consistent with recommendations from current guidance.3 He was subsequently started on azathioprine and weaned on regular steroids.
Outcome and follow-up
Our patient has shown a very good clinical response to therapy. A cardiac MRI 10 months later showed an improved ejection fraction to 51% with some resolution of myocardial fibrosis and New York Heart Association class 1. He remains under our follow-up for control of his asthma and has a persistent eosinophilia and an exacerbation rate of 2/year. At 6 months postdischarge, a repeat antibody screen was negative and repeated chest radiograph showed persistent elevation of the left hemidiaphragm.
Discussion
Literature is currently divided on the relationship between omalizumab and EGPA. There are several papers that propose omalizumab to be potentially useful treatment for EGPA; indeed, multiple case reports have reported cases where omalizumab has been beneficial to patients with known EGPA.4–8 On the contrary, there are a number of case reports detailing cases where omalizumab therapy is linked to the onset of EGPA.9–15 The pathogenesis of this was hypothesised to be related to omalizumab, leading to better asthma control, in turn leading to tapering of oral corticosteroid therapy, unmasking an underlying EGPA disease. However, the presence of a case in the literature detailing a patient who developed EGPA following omalizumab therapy, having not been treated with long-term corticosteroids12 highlighted the need for further research.
A systematic review was conducted by Nazir et al aiming to analyse the pathogenesis of Omalizumab-related EGPA. Four cases were found where EGPA developed following Omalizumab therapy, where there was no tapering of corticosteroids.8 11 12 16 However, only one of these cases described a case where regular oral corticosteroid therapy was continued, for a length of 16 months.8 Nazir et al concluded that patients commenced on omalizumab should be closely monitored for signs of EGPA, and that while omalizumab use should continue until further data became available, a causal link between omalizumab and EGPA could not be ruled out.17
More recently, a systematic literature review by Basta et al found only wo cases of omalizumab-related EGPA, which they felt were not related to steroid tapering.10 12 They, therefore, felt that current evidence went against a causal link between omalizumab and EGPA onset, pointing back to a steroid tapering theory for pathogenesis. However, they concluded that a relationship could not be excluded and hypothesised that a loss of counterregulatory mechanisms may drive this pathogenesis, therefore recommending cautious steroid tapering in patients given omalizumab.18
To our knowledge, this is a rare case reported where a patient has developed p-ANCA-negative EGPA following initiation of omalizumab therapy, while maintaining a steady regular corticosteroid therapy. It is possible that the association was coincidental and that the Th2 immunophenotype (as evidenced by the eosinophilia and raised FeNO noted at the initial consultation) was a precursor to the development of EGPA. Nonetheless this case highlights the need for further work to establish the exact nature of the relationship between omalizumab and EGPA.
Patient’s perspective
I developed asthma in my early 20s requiring no more than occasional use of a ventolin inhaler. As time progressed, and the use of ventolin increased, inhaled steroids were introduced followed by a short and unsuccessful trial of Montelukast and then a long-acting β-agonist . Worsening overall control led to a change in my inhalers and the introduction of zafirlukast, which did seem initially to help. Subsequent unstable control, which impacted on my lifestyle that included running, playing squash and swimming, led to a further review in secondary care a couple of years ago. The decision was taken by my consultant for me to stay on long term low dose oral prednisolone. At the same time, consideration was given to commencing Xolair due to my high IgE levels.
A trial of Xolair commenced in February 2018. A few weeks later, having noticed some lightheadedness, I noted that my normal resting pulse that tended to run in the upper 40s/low 50s was in the 80s and was irregular. An ECG confirmed atrial fibrillation. I was already anticoagulated owing to two previous pulmonary emboli and rate control was introduced by my GP. An echocardiogram and cardiology outpatient referral were arranged. My exercise tolerance changed overnight following the onset of atrial fibrillation and I was unable to exercise at the same level of intensity, which proved immensely frustrating.
My active lifestyle had proved invaluable counteracting the demands of working as a full-time GP and I am sure contributed to the ongoing enjoyment I gained from my work.
It was initially felt that the A.F was not connected to the introduction of Xolair and the trial, with my agreement, continued and my asthma improved with fewer exacerbations requiring fewer stepups of prednisolone. I did however experience a few muscle pains, mild flushes and ongoing non-specific symptoms which seemed at the time to tie in with the onset of atrial fibrillation and the introduction of rate-controlling calcium channel blocker. A cardiology outpatient appointment was awaited.
Six weeks later I developed a short lived and mild left sided ptosis and some very short lived sensory disturbance in one arm which prompted an urgent visit to my GP and an urgent referral to the TIA clinic where I was seen 2 days later. Neurological examination and CT scan were completely normal but nevertheless urgent neurological follow-up was arranged owing to the unusual presentation and lack of a clear diagnosis. The following day I travelled to the Lake District for a long weekend fell walking. I did not feel as energetic as usual and again attributed this to the atrial fibrillation but overnight on our last night experienced intense pain in my left leg and by the following morning had developed marked weakness in the left leg.
My friends drove me the 3 hours back home, during which time other neurological symptoms had started in all four limbs, which suggested that this was not cerebrovascular, and I was admitted to hospital with sensory motor deficit in all four limbs. A diagnosis was not clearcut. Guillain Barre syndrome was included in the differential diagnosis, but after a couple of days of extensive investigation, a vasculitis was felt to be the cause and high-dose steroids commenced. Xolair and zafirlukast, as potential triggers were stopped.
By this time, I was unable to walk and had little use of my hands. I required an enormous amount of help during my 10 days in hospital. The rapidity and severity of these symptoms were devastating and initially I felt that I was going to wake from a bad dream but as the days rolled on, with improvement being seen on the steroids, it was clear that this was no dream.
By the time of my discharge, I was able to walk short distances with support and had regained some use of my hands although struggled with the ongoing marked weakness in all four limbs, fatigue and lack of dexterity. While coming home was very welcome despite the terrific care I received in hospital (I was sleeping very poorly probably partly due to the hospital environment and also the steroids), the adaptation required to manage the disability by myself and my wife was massive and at times incredibly challenging. The impact this illness had on family and friends was also very noticeable, no doubt driven by the magnitude of change they saw in someone who had been so active. Slowly the situation has improved. Three months on, and with input from a neurophysiotherapist and ongoing steroid treatment, I am now driving again, walking distances up to 8 miles although on the flat, swimming, attending a gym on a regular basis to rebuild muscle bulk and strength and undertaking Pilates. The rapid loss of muscle bulk at the time I was initially ill was incredible in its speed. I am able now to function independently and undertaking activities that 3 months ago were impossible. I can attend business meetings at my practice again, which has also been mentally positive.
As a consequence, my quality of life has improved, and while I am aware that I still have a long way to go and will probably never regain my former levels of activity, I am grateful that I can undertake many activities now that will give me the opportunity to improve as best I can. I remain off work, partly due to the immunosuppressant treatment I am currently receiving and partly due to loss of sensation in my hands and should my symptoms improve sufficiently, then I would hope that a return to part time work may be possible in due course. Should this not prove possible then, having taken my NHS Pension at normal retirement age, I can afford to retire. The financial effects of this illness could have been huge had this illness happened previously when I was younger.
At the time I was first ill I found the abrupt cessation of normal life, coupled with loss of self-esteem, very difficult to handle. My entire life had effectively collapsed. The loss of all the many and varied activities that I enjoyed coupled with the sudden loss of contact with my patients and work colleagues was extremely hard. I felt that I was letting down both the practice and my patients despite patently being in no shape to be of any use to them. Over time came the appreciation that none of us, workwise, is indispensable. The practice was already busy as a result of difficulties in recruiting and my absenteeism came at a very bad time. Like me, the practice has had to adapt.
I was told at the outset that the recovery and rehabilitation would be long and would be hard. This was an understatement and is 20 times tougher than any training that I used to undertake for my half marathons or other sports. However, with each week comes ongoing improvement, easier for those around me to see than for myself, but there are objective signs all the time which I do see and this helps enormously and provides the driver I need to continue pushing myself.
Learning points
-
There may be an association with omalizumab therapy and the development of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA).
-
The hypothesis that omalizumab-associated EGPA is related to tapering of steroid therapy appears insufficient.
-
Patients commenced on omalizumab for difficult to control asthma should be monitored closely for signs of EGPA, particularly if oral steroids are being tapered.
Ethics statements
Footnotes
-
Contributors LNC acquired the information for the case report from the patients notes and was the primary author of the report. He coordinated attaining the patient perspective and consent from the patient. AP revised the case write up and helped write about the background to the case, as well as contributing to the discussion. DS supervised this report. He is the consultant in charge of the patient’s care, and revised the case report, giving approval for it’s submission. We all agree to be accountable for the article and to ensure that all questions regarding the accuracy or integrity of the article are investigated and resolved.
-
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- © BMJ Publishing Group Limited 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
References
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer