Subdural false twins: concomitant appearance of subdural haematoma and spontaneous subdural empyema

  1. Rúben Santos Cardoso ,
  2. Sofia Tavares ,
  3. Inácio Reis and
  4. José Luís Alves
  1. Neurosurgery, Hospital and University Center of Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rúben Santos Cardoso; rubenjscardoso@gmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:26 May 2021
First published:21 Jun 2021
Online issue publication:21 Jun 2021

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

A 55-year-old man was taken to the emergency department due to right arm weakness for the past 3 days and fever (39.5°C). There was no impaired consciousness, no history of trauma and meningeal signs were absent on physical examination. Blood analysis and inflammatory markers were not evocative of a systemic infection. A cranial CT scan was requested, revealing hypodense bilateral hemispheric subdural collections, suggestive of chronic subdural haematomas. He was submitted to surgical drainage by burr holes, which confirmed the chronic subdural collection on the left side. Unexpectedly, after dural opening on the right side, a subdural purulent collection was found, which was later confirmed as an empyema due to Escherichia coli infection. A second surgical drainage was performed by craniotomy due to recurrence of the right subdural collection. Spontaneously appearing subdural empyemas due to E. coli are extremely rare and their treatment is not always straightforward. The reported case is an example of an apparently straightforward and frequent pathology that turned out to be a challenging case, requiring a multidisciplinary approach.

Background

Chronic subdural haematomas are one of the most common types of intracranial post-traumatic collections and their incidence appears to be increasing in developed countries, in part due to the increasing life expectancy and prevalence of antiplatelet and anticoagulation therapy. The timing and cause of chronic subdural haematomas are often unclear and undetermined. Prognosis is favourable and treatment is usually simple and straightforward.

Conversely, subdural empyemas are relatively rare conditions, most often occurring after neurosurgical procedures, penetrating head injuries or otorhinogenic infections. On the other hand, spontaneous subdural empyemas are extremely rare with only a few reported cases. Furthermore, we could not find any report of a synchronous occurrence of a subdural chronic haematoma and a spontaneous subdural empyema.

We believe this is a curious and challenging case due to the unforeseen initial diagnosis, only possible at surgical inspection, that elicited doubts about the ideal course of action and need of a multidisciplinary approach to achieve the best clinical management.

Case presentation

The authors present the case of a 55-year-old man with a history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, chronic alcoholism and smoking habits. He was brought to the emergency department (ED) due to right arm weakness for the past 3 days. He reported several episodes of syncope on coughing in the past month and was being investigated for possible carotid sinus hypersensitivity. His vital signs were stable, except for fever (39°C) and he had no consciousness impairment (Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) 15). No other neurological changes were noted at physical examination; meningeal signs were absent and no focus of systemic or local infection was found after observation by the neurology and internal medicine departments.

Investigations

In the month preceding this acute presentation, a cranial CT scan had been done as part of the investigation of carotid sinus hypersensitivity, which was deemed as normal (figure 1).

Figure 1

Cranial CT scan 1 month prior to the event showing no pathological hemispheric collections. L, left side; R, right side.

A new CT scan was requested at the ED owing to the new neurological findings, revealing bilateral hypodense subdural collections with hyperdense areas suggestive of subdural membranes or blood clots (figure 2). Blood samples showed an elevation of C reactive protein (23 mg/dL) but no associated leucocytosis. Blood coagulation values were within normal range.

Figure 2

Cranial CT scan showing bilateral subdural hemispheric collections. Both have the same imaging features, appearing to be typical chronic/subacute subdural haematomas with small sites of recent bleeding (best seen on the left side). L, left side; R, right side.

By this time, the neurosurgical department was confident that the subdural collections were the reason behind the new symptoms and signs of the patient and that they were compatible with chronic subdural haematomas.

Treatment

Given the dimensions and the development of neurological impairment, surgery was considered the primary treatment option. As with most chronic/subacute subdural haematomas, it was decided to use burr holes to evacuate the collections. No specific adjustments were made concerning the normal approach to this surgery. The patient was positioned in dorsal decubitus position, with head elevated 30° and centred in the midline.

The first two burr holes were made on the left frontal and parietal bones and, after opening of the dura mater, blood clots and a typical ‘motor oil’ chronic subdural collection were drained.

The next two burr holes were made on the right frontal and parietal bones. Although the same findings were expected on the right side, after opening the dural layer, a yellow, purulent liquid under pressure was drained and collected for microbiological analysis. The remaining of the procedure was uneventful and included macroscopic cleaning of both collections after repeated washing with conventional lukewarm saline solution. The recently expanded cerebral parenchyma was visualised through the burr holes on both sides. Bilateral subdural drainage systems were placed at the frontal burr holes before closure and gentamicin was applied to the subcutaneous tissue on the right side.

Postoperative CT scan (24 hours after the procedure) confirmed the drainage of both subdural collections, with clear improvement of mass effect (figure 3). In the first postoperative days, an improvement of motor function on the right arm was noticed. The patient was transferred to infectious diseases department, according to our institution’s protocol for spontaneous infections of the central nervous system, and empirical intravenous antibiotherapy was started using broad-spectrum antibiotics (ceftriaxone, vancomycin and metronidazole). On the fourth day, the microbiological analysis of the subdural empyema revealed the presence of Escherichia coli and therapeutic regimen was changed accordingly to piperacilin/tazobactam.

Figure 3

Cranial CT scan 24 hours after the first surgery. The brain parenchyma expanded and no complications were detected (only minor pneumocephalus). L, left side; R, right side.

Despite good analytical evolution with reduction in the C reactive protein values (1.71 mg/dL), by the seventh day after surgery, a marked neurological deterioration was noted (the patient opened his eyes only on request, did not obey commands and was confused—GCS 12) and a new CT scan was performed showing a recurrence of the right subdural collection and associated generalised sulcus attenuation (figure 4).

Figure 4

Cranial CT scan 7 days after the first surgery. Relapse of the right-side subdural collection with marked reduction of the sulci. L, left side; R, right side.

The patient was, once again, brought to the operating room. This time, a small circular frontoparietal craniotomy was performed on the right side. A well-organised fibrotic capsule was identified in the subdural space circumscribing the subdural empyema. The same capsule was coagulated and removed, with copious washing of the subdural space. The drained subdural collection was once again sent to microbiological analysis.

A control CT scan was performed on the next day, showing no complications (figure 5).

Figure 5

Cranial CT scan 24 hours after the second surgery. Drainage of the relapsed left subdural collection with reduction of its mass effect. L, left side; R, right side.

The patient started a new cycle of intravenous antibiotherapy (ceftriaxone and metronidazol during 4 weeks) and remained in the infectious diseases ward until discharge. The new microbiological study was inconclusive.

No local or systemic infections (besides the subdural empyema) were detected during in-hospital stay (urine, blood and sputum cultures were negative).

The patient progressively recovered from his previous status (GCS 15 with no neurological deficits), with analytical improvement at discharge (C reactive protein=0.18 mg/dL without other relevant changes) and complete reabsorption of the residual subdural collection was confirmed by imaging (figure 6).

Figure 6

Cranial CT scan 21 days after second surgery. Almost complete reabsorption of subdural collections. L, left side; R, right side.

He was discharged 51 days after admission and underwent an additional 2 weeks of oral antibiotics at home (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid).

Outcome and follow-up

The patient was observed at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year after discharge by a neurosurgeon and an infectiologist. No complications were observed and the patient remained completely functional, with no limitations, returning to his normal activity.

Discussion

With an increasingly ageing world population, haemorrhagic traumatic lesions associated with minor or no trauma are becoming more frequent, not only due to individual frailty as a result of comorbidities (eg, diabetes mellitus, chronic hepatic diseases, haematological illnesses) but also due to the increased prevalence of anticoagulant therapy in the general population.1

The mechanism of formation of chronic subdural haematomas is thought to be the result of an initial inflammatory response to an acute bleeding, calling out fibroblasts that invade the new clot, with formation of neomembranes in between the dural sheets. New capillaries grow and continuous degradation of blood clot by enzymatic fibrinolysis occurs. Fibrin degradation products will later inhibit haemostasis contributing to the increase in size and perpetuation of the subdural collection.2

Subdural empyemas are usually associated with some well-identified causes: (1) previous cranial surgery, (2) penetrating head/facial injuries and (3) otorhinogenic infections.3 On the other hand, spontaneous subdural empyemas are even rarer and there are only 10 described cases of E. coli as the causative microorganism.4

The spontaneous infection of subdural haematomas is a rare event with approximately half a hundred cases reported in the literature, and it is suggested that it might be due to a secondary haematogenous seeding of a pre-existing subdural haematoma (eg, urinary tract infection, bacterial translocation from the gut and others).5–7

It is not clear if our case represents a primary spontaneous subdural empyema or a secondary infection of a pre-existing subdural haematoma. Despite this, some factors are unique to this case, like the presence of two imagiologically similar subdural collections with different aetiologies (concomitant subdural haematoma and subdural empyema/infected subdural haematoma) with a similar timeline (a month prior to the first surgery, a CT scan had been performed showing no subdural collections).

CT scans are the most widely used imaging modality for initial investigation of subdural collections. Nevertheless, it is not the best one to help establish the diagnosis of an empyema. A high suspicion is needed in order to ask for a contrast enhanced CT scan (which might enhance the inner membrane of an infected subdural haematoma). MRI would be the modality of choice, showing an increased concentration of proteins of the subdural infection compared with the cerebrospinal fluid but it is not as widely and promptly available.5

The primary neurosurgical option to drain subdural collections is to use burr holes although it seems that, when a craniotomy is performed, the rates of recurrence are significantly lower (in line with what happened in the reported case). The outcome tends to be favourable either way.5 8

Learning points

  • Spontaneous subdural empyemas due to Escherichia coli are rare with less than a dozen cases reported, including this one. Secondary infection of pre-existing subdural haematomas is a rare condition, with less than 50 cases reported.

  • The coexistence of two different diagnoses with similar imaging features in CT scans is extremely rare but possible. Clinicians need to be aware of the most common symptoms and signs of an underlying infection of the nervous system.

  • The best surgical management of infected subdural haematomas is unclear but craniotomy seems to be the best choice. Subdural empyemas can be successfully treated with early diagnosis, surgical drainage and concomitant eradication of infectious agents with systemic antibiotics.

  • There are no clear guidelines regarding the antibiotics used in these rare cases since they are few and sparse. The antibiotic regimen used for this case was (8 weeks total) the following:

    • Ceftriaxone+vancomycin+metronidazol—4 days.

    • Piperacillin/tazobactam—10 days (after proved sensitivity of E. coli).

    • Ceftriaxone+metronidazol—31 days (after second surgery).

    • Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid—14 days (after discharge).

  • Multidisciplinary evaluation and care is of utmost importance in order to provide our patients with the best possible care.

Ethics statements

Footnotes

  • Contributors RJSC—participation in the second surgery, following of the patient in the infirmary, writing of the case report, and addition of figures and videos. ST—participation in the first surgery, following of the patient in the infirmary and writing of the case report. IR—participation in the first surgery, following of the patient in the infirmary and review of the case report. JLA—participation in the first surgery, review of the case report and following of the patient in the infirmary.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer