Prevention of postoperative delirium through the avoidance of potentially inappropriate medications in a geriatric surgical patient

  1. Kevin G Burfeind 1 , 2,
  2. Andrés A Tirado Navales 1,
  3. Brandon Michael Togioka 1 and
  4. Katie Schenning 1
  1. 1 Anesthesiology & Perioperative Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
  2. 2 Medical Scientist Training Program, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Brandon Michael Togioka; togioka@ohsu.edu

Publication history

Accepted:06 Apr 2021
First published:19 Apr 2021
Online issue publication:19 Apr 2021

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

We demonstrate the utility of risk stratification for postoperative delirium in geriatric patients and show that postoperative delirium can be prevented in high-risk patients when potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) (medications that are best avoided in older adults) are avoided. In this case, a 65-year-old woman underwent two debridement procedures with similar presurgical risk for postoperative delirium. There was no risk stratification or preoperative cognitive assessment in the first procedure, she received PIMs and developed postoperative delirium. In the second procedure, PIMs were intentionally avoided and postoperative delirium did not occur. This case supports recent recommendations from the European Society of Anaesthesiology, the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the American Geriatrics Society that providers assess a patient’s cognitive function and delirium risk profile preoperatively to appropriately guide perioperative management.

Background

Delirium is defined as an acute change in mental status characterised by reduced awareness of the environment, attention disturbance and fluctuating course.1 It is a common postoperative complication, occurring in half of geriatric surgical patients.2 Postoperative delirium is associated with several short-term and long-term complications, including increased hospital length-of-stay, higher healthcare costs,3 dementia4 and increased mortality.5 Delirium occurs most commonly after cardiac surgery, but is common after many other procedures, including orthopaedic, general and spine surgeries.6

Postoperative delirium is the result of an interplay between predisposing (patient-related) and precipitating (perioperative) risk factors.7 8 Common predisposing factors include pre-existing cognitive impairment, advanced age and frailty.9 10 Medical comorbidities associated with increased risk include presence of infection, inadequately controlled pain, alcohol use, sleep deprivation or disturbance, renal failure and depression. Precipitating factors include type and duration of surgery, blood loss and specific perioperative medications administered.7 Because half of the delirium cases that occur in the hospital are thought to be preventable,11 experts recommend preoperative screening for delirium risk factors to identify patients at highest risk. For example, the American Geriatrics Society recommends, “Healthcare professionals caring for surgical patients should perform a preoperative assessment of delirium risk factors, including age greater than 65 years, chronic cognitive decline or dementia, poor vision or hearing, severe illness, and presence of infection”,12 and suggests that patients with two or more risk factors should be considered at high risk for postoperative delirium. In addition, the American Society of Anesthesiology Perioperative Neurotoxicity Working Group recommends, “Baseline cognition should be objectively evaluated with a brief screening tool during preoperative evaluation in all patients over the age of 65 and in any patient with risk factors for preexisting cognitive impairment.”13

While there is a paucity of evidence available to implicate specific anaesthetic agents or modalities in the development of postoperative delirium, current guidelines strongly recommend minimising the administration of deliriogenic medications in the perioperative period, particularly in high-risk geriatric patients.7 13 The American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria is an explicit list of PIMs that should be avoided in geriatric patients whenever possible.14 The American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria recommends against use of various medications that are commonly administered perioperatively, including benzodiazepines, anticholinergics, antipsychotics, H2-receptor antagonists and meperidine.

Here, we present a case of postoperative delirium following spine surgery in which the patient presented preoperatively with multiple risk factors and received several intraoperative potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). In this self-controlled case report involving two operating room procedures within 4 days, we report improved postoperative neurocognitive recovery following PIM avoidance. This case illustrates that preoperative risk factors for postoperative delirium should be assessed formally and should guide perioperative care and medication administration in geriatric surgical patients. Because pre-existing cognitive impairment is one of the most important risk factors, formal assessment includes using a validated, brief cognitive screening tool such as the Mini-Cog.13 15 16

Case presentation

A 65-year-old woman presented to the emergency department on postoperative day 4 following an elective open decompression with posterior spinal fusion at the fourth and fifth vertebrae for lumbar stenosis with neurogenic claudication. The case timeline is depicted in figure 1. The patient presented with severe back pain and bloody drainage from her surgical site. Her medical history included congestive heart failure, stroke, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, obesity (body mass index 34 kg/m2), peripheral neuropathy and insomnia. Her home medications included metformin, trazodone, labetalol, doxazosin, beclomethasone, albuterol, atorvastatin and gabapentin. The patient did not develop postoperative delirium after her initial spine surgery. She was taking oral hydromorphone for postoperative pain control. She reported no known history of prior anaesthesia complications.

Figure 1

Case timeline. AMS, altered mental status; ED, emergency department; L, lumbar.

On presentation to the emergency department, she met three of four systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, as she was found to be febrile, tachycardic, hypotensive and had a leukocytosis of 18×109/L (up from 12×109/L the day prior). The patient was also anaemic with a haemoglobin of 100 g/L. The patient’s caregiver reported she was becoming more confused and forgetful. She was admitted for evaluation and management of SIRS.

The patient’s mental status improved by hospital day 2. She had mild intermittent confusion overnight, but was alert and oriented during the day. On hospital day 5, due to continued drainage from the surgical site and persistent leukocytosis, the decision was made to perform a surgical debridement. The incision was reopened, the surgical site was cleaned, and a wound vacuum was placed. The surgery team planned to return the patient to the operating room 2 days later for a second debridement, removal of the wound vacuum and closure of the surgical site. While the procedure was without complication, the patient received multiple perioperative PIMs, including midazolam, metoclopramide, glycopyrrolate and dexamethasone (table 1). When the patient arrived in the post-anaesthesia care unit, she developed severe hyperactive delirium, including altered mental status, impulsivity, agitation and paranoia. She continually attempted to get out of bed, pulled out her intravenous line and made irrational accusations. Multiple providers were required to safely transport the patient from the post-anaesthesia care unit to the ward.

Table 1

Medications administered during surgical debridements

Medications administered in debridement #1 Medications administered in debridement #2
*Metoclopramide is included in 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria.13 Although midazolam, dexamethasone and glycopyrrolate are not specifically listed by name, benzodiazepines, steroids and anticholinergic medications are listed.
Midazolam 2 mg* Ketamine 50 mg
Fentanyl 250 µg Fentanyl 100 µg
Lidocaine 2% 80 mg Lidocaine 2% 60 mg
Propofol 170 mg Propofol 100 mg
Rocuronium 40 mg Rocuronium 50 mg
Dexamethasone 4 mg* Sugammadex 400 mg
Metoclopramide 10 mg* Dexmedetomidine 50 µg
Ondansetron 4 mg Ondansetron 4 mg
Neostigmine 4 mg Vasopressin 2 units
Cefazolin 2 g Cefazolin 2 g
Phenylephrine 200 µg Phenylephrine 594 µg
Glycopyrrolate 0.6 mg*

Outcome and follow-up

No changes in mental status, fluctuations in awareness or episodes of inattention were recognised after her second surgical debridement and she was discharged home 3 days later (postoperative day 16 from her original spinal surgery). Three months postoperatively, the patient was recovering as expected. Her incision was well healed with no further concerns of drainage or infection. She reported no subjective cognitive deficits in the 3 months following hospital discharge. Unfortunately, the patient was found deceased in her home 6 months after hospital discharge. Her passing was attributed to complications from stage 4 chronic kidney disease and diabetes mellitus.

Discussion

Risk factors for postoperative delirium are well studied and multiple evidence-based prediction and prevention guidelines have been developed.13 17–20 However, many anaesthesia providers remain unaware of these recommendations.21

Multiple factors may have contributed to this patient’s postoperative delirium. The patient presented to the emergency department on postoperative day 4 from her original spine surgery with SIRS, a risk factor for postoperative central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction22 and delirium.23 SIRS induces prolonged altered mental status and sensitises the brain to future insults, even after other clinical signs have disappeared.24 In animal models, SIRS induces prolonged neuroinflammation, which persists months after systemic inflammation resolves.25

The American Geriatrics Society recommends preoperative screening for delirium risk factors: poor vision, severe illness, cognitive impairment and frailty.12 It is recommended that preoperative cognitive status is assessed via validated screening instruments such as the Mini-Cog.7 12 13 While various screening tools have been developed,26 a recent systematic review found that existing prediction models show inadequate predictive capabilities, and there is a need to develop robust models of delirium prediction.27 This patient had many predisposing risk factors for postoperative delirium. In addition to her age, her overall burden of comorbid conditions is a risk factor. She had chronic kidney disease, a sleep disorder and a previous stroke—all of which increase risk for postoperative delirium.28 Poorly controlled pain, as occurred in this case, can also precipitate postoperative delirium.29 In addition, while the patient was not overtly delirious on presentation, her caregiver did report increasing confusion. Various forms of preoperative cognitive impairment (mild cognitive impairment, dementia, delirium, etc) are strong risk factors for postoperative delirium.9 Thus, the patient’s altered mental status on presentation put her at higher risk for subsequent postoperative delirium.

PIMs such as midazolam and dexamethasone are among the 20 most commonly used medications by anaesthesiologists.30 While guidelines recommend avoiding these medications in geriatric patients,13 it was recently reported that anaesthesiologists are often unaware of these guidelines,21 suggesting that education is needed to change standard practice.

There is a lack of high-quality evidence to support particular anaesthetic techniques for the prevention of postoperative delirium. There is no consensus on whether there is a difference in the occurrence of delirium following inhalational versus intravenous anaesthetic agents, nor is there evidence to support general versus regional techniques.31 32 Similarly, there is conflicting data regarding the use of intraoperative processed electroencephalogram monitoring to reduce the risk of postoperative delirium.33–36 Despite limited prospective evidence of benefit from the avoidance of PIMs (as defined by the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria), most guidelines on the prevention of postoperative delirium strongly recommend avoiding them.7 13 17 This patient received multiple PIMs during her first debridement: metoclopramide, midazolam (a benzodiazepine) and dexamethasone (a steroid). The patient also received glycopyrrolate (an anticholinergic). Although glycopyrrolate has minimal CNS penetrance, it does cross the blood–brain barrier to a small extent,37 and the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria recommends avoiding anticholinergic medications. All of these medications have relatively short half-life elimination times (1–5 hours), so it is unclear if the resolution of the patient’s delirium (on postoperative day 1) coincided with medication clearance.

It is worth noting that several clinical variables changed between debridements, making it challenging to definitively ascribe the patient’s lack of postoperative delirium after the second surgery to the avoidance of PIMs. For example, the patient no longer met the SIRS criteria, which may have put her at a lower risk for delirium. However, the patient was anaemic and continued to complain of back pain, both of which are risk factors for postoperative delirium.38 39 Furthermore, by the second debridement, the patient had been hospitalised for 9 days. Length-of-hospital stay is associated with delirium.40 The challenge of assigning relative value to risk factors for postoperative delirium further emphasises the need for further research of the role of perioperative PIMs in postoperative delirium.

The anaesthetic team for the second debridement had the advantage of knowing the patient’s previous postoperative course. The patient was administered a one-time subanaesthetic dose of intraoperative ketamine. Ketamine attenuates the early postoperative inflammatory response,41 and is neuroprotective in vitro.42 In small clinical trials, subanaesthetic doses of ketamine have been associated with decreased postoperative delirium and less postoperative cognitive dysfunction.43 44 While a subsequent large randomised trial showed no difference in postoperative delirium after ketamine administration,45 there is still debate as to whether this medication provides a degree of neuroprotection or plays a role in preventing postoperative delirium.46 The patient was administered intraoperative dexmedetomidine, which has been shown to reduce the incidence of postoperative delirium in the intensive care unit, when compared with other sedatives.47–49

This case provides anecdotal evidence that avoiding PIMs may reduce postoperative delirium. A limitation of our case report is that the preoperative risk for postoperative delirium may not have been equal between the two surgeries, as the patient’s infection likely improved following the first debridement. Nevertheless, we agree with recent guidelines recommending preoperative cognitive screening for geriatric surgical patients, risk stratification and the avoidance of the American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria PIMs in high-risk patients.7 13 17 32

Learning points

  • Postoperative delirium is common in geriatric surgical patients.

  • Postoperative delirium is associated with increased hospital length-of-stay, higher cost, dementia and increased mortality.

  • Preoperative cognitive screening can identify patients who may benefit by avoidance of the American Geriatric Society Beers Criteria potentially inappropriate medications.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Marie Kane for her assistance with manuscript formatting and editing.

Footnotes

  • KGB and AATN are joint first authors.

  • Contributors The work was supervised by KS. The patient was under the care of KS. All authors shared in the analysis and interpretation of findings. The report was written by KGB, ATN, BMT and KS. All authors give final approval for the version submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. KGB and ATN should be considered co-first authors as they shared equally in all aspects of this report.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer