Peripheral T-cell lymphoma presenting as fever of unknown origin in a man with deranged liver function tests and pancytopenia

  1. Catharine McKay 1,
  2. Lin-Tse Hong 2 and
  3. A K M Nizam Uddin 3 , 4
  1. 1 Medicine, Central Gippsland Health Service, Sale, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2 Medicine Department, Central Gippsland Health Service, Sale, Victoria, Australia
  3. 3 Monash Lung & Sleep, Central Gippsland Health Service, Sale, Victoria, Australia
  4. 4 Lung & Sleep, Monash Medical Centre Clayton, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr A K M Nizam Uddin; akmnizam@gmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:26 Feb 2021
First published:10 Mar 2021
Online issue publication:10 Mar 2021

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

Peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS) is a relatively rare condition in Australia. Here, we report a case of PTCL, NOS in a patient who presented with persistent fever and progressive pancytopenia on a background of mediastinal lymphadenopathy, initially presumed reactive and hepatosplenomegaly with deranged liver function tests. The diagnosis was challenging, with multiple negative blood cultures and inconclusive bone marrow studies, and it required extensive investigations that ultimately revealed the characteristic clinical, histopathological and immunophenotypic features of PTCL, NOS. The patient underwent multiple rounds of multiagent chemotherapy after the diagnosis. This case highlights the difficulty in diagnosing PTCL, NOS and the importance of including it as a differential diagnosis in younger patients who present with constitutional symptoms and hepatosplenomegaly.

Background

Peripheral T-cell lymphomas (PTCL) are relatively rare, differ widely in terms of how they present, and account for between 10% and 15% of all non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas.1 As a result of their heterogeneity, they are often difficult to diagnose, and treatment options remain associated with poor outcomes.2 The definitive method for diagnosing PTCL is through a haematopathological diagnosis based on a confirmatory biopsy.

In this case, this patient had a negative bronchoscopy and two negative bone marrow aspirate and trephines (BMAT), despite many clinical signs indicating disease, which delayed treatment as a result. We also review 15 previously reported cases in which diagnosis of PTCL, not otherwise specified (NOS) was delayed or difficult due to atypical presentation or negative initial biopsies.

The subject of this case study is fortunately still alive at time of writing, but the most recent update of his disease status indicated an ongoing aggressive progression of lymphoma despite multiagent chemotherapy.

It is essential for clinicians to remain vigilant with regard to confirming/excluding the diagnosis of this aggressive disease, with consideration of further invasive procedures if initial approaches are inconclusive.

Case presentation

A 57-year-old dairy farmer presented to his rural general practitioner (GP) in June 2017 with a 2-year history of night sweats and increasing shortness of breath, as well as new onset of anaemia. His prior medical history included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (with a 40 pack-year smoking history), atrial fibrillation (controlled with flecainide) and postural hypotension for which no cause was ever identified. His mental health history was significant for anxiety, depression and bipolar disorder managed with venlafaxine, mirtazapine and diazepam. He had no allergies and had no significant family history.

A CT scan of his chest organised by his GP revealed bulky lymphadenopathy suspicious for lymphoma. He was referred to a local haematologist for investigation, however, several biopsies taken during endobronchial ultrasound did not reveal any malignant cells and a repeat CT done several months later showed shrinking lymph nodes. The patient’s symptoms were stable and attributed to a presumptive diagnosis of reactive lymphadenopathy.

Four months later, this patient presented to the emergency department (ED) of our rural hospital with a 1-week history of fevers, rigours, vague abdominal discomfort and multiple presyncopal episodes over the previous 24 hours. He had no localised infective symptoms. An initial workup in ED revealed pancytopenia with significantly elevated inflammatory markers, deranged liver function tests of a primarily cholestatic picture, an abdominal ultrasound scan (USS) showing mild hepatosplenomegaly without evidence of cirrhosis and an unremarkable chest X-ray. Repeated blood and faecal cultures did not grow any pathogens, nevertheless he was treated with 5 days of IV Tazocin for sepsis of unknown origin, which resulted in improving inflammatory markers. After also receiving a transfusion of packed red blood cells for persistent anaemia, he was discharged home on oral antibiotics.

One week after discharge, the patient represented to our hospital with ongoing febrile illness, involving multiple intermittent fevers throughout the day. Despite continuing oral antibiotics he had declined clinically, reporting further episodes of fevers and presyncope. On examination, he was tachycardic and hypotensive. Physical examination revealed hepatosplenomegaly but no palpable lymphadenopathy or abnormal respiratory sounds were present. He was readmitted for further elucidation of the cause of his symptoms and treatment with intravenous antibiotics in the interim.

Investigations

Laboratory findings on his initial presentation to our hospital in February revealed elevated C reactive protein level of 235 mg/L, with pancytopenia including low white cell count 3.2×109/L cells with mild neutropaenia, low haemoglobin 85 g/L and a low platelet count of 91×109/L. The pancytopenia continued to worsen over the course of his inpatient stay in March/April (table 1). His liver function tests were also deranged but predominantly cholestatic in nature, with aspartate aminotransferase 199 IU/L (normal: 13–31 IU/L), alanine aminotransferase 97 IU/L (normal: 8–34 IU/L), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) 1850 IU/L (normal: 115–217 IU/L) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor 2170 U/mL (normal: 145–519 U/mL). By the time of his second admission, his liver function tests had worsened (table 1).

Table 1

: laboratory result summary showing worsening pancytopenia with deranged liver function tests and elevated inflammatory markers

5 March 2019 9 March 2019 14 March 2019 15 March 2019 16 March 2019 17 March 2019 18 March 2019 19 Mar 2019 20 March 2019 21 March 2019 22 March 2019 23 March 2019 24 March 2019 26 March 2019 27 March 2019 28 March 2019 29 March 2019 30 March 2019 1 April 2019 2 April 2019
Highlighted values means are not normal values-Abnormal.
Haemoglobin 86 116 111 106 104 105 93 84 86 78 76 85 77 72 79 84 72 73 72 71
Platelet count 65 211 153 148 114 96 81 74 66 67 64 65 60 61 66 40 48 61 58
Total Leucocyte Count 3.0 4.4 4.8 3.6 3.5 3.3 2.2 2.2 2.6 2.4 2.1 2.0 2.5 2.1 1.6 2.0 2.1 2.3 2.8 2.9
Neutrophils 1.9 2.7 3.0 2.2 2.2 2.0 1.3 1.3 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.5 1.3 1.0 1.1 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.2
Sodium 136 130 133 132 133 133 132 136 137 133 133 132 133 136 134 134
Potassium 3.8 4.4 4.3 4.2 3.6 3.8 3.2 3.1 4.0 4.1 3.6 4.0 4.3 3.8 4.5 4.2
Chloride 100 95 99 97 99 99 99 103 103 99 98 99 101 101 100 100
Bicarbonate 28 28 26 25 27 27 25 25 27 27 27 23 23 27 24 26
Urea 3.3 6.5 5.6 5.8 5.1 4.8 4.1 3.9 3.9 4.3 6.2 5.8 6.1 5.9 5.7 5.5
Creatinine 66 102 91 96 89 87 74 74 70 83 97 95 84 83 82 75
Calcium 2.25 1.94 1.97 1.92 1.93 1.99 1.88 1.97
Corrected calcium 2.46 2.31 2.32 2.31 2.33 2.37 2.29 2.35
Magnesium 0.84 0.73 0.69 0.69 0.67 0.75 0.67 0.79
Phosphate 1.05 0.86 0.91 0.97 0.91 1.11 0.82 1.20
Serum total protein 49 67 58 63 59 56 50 52 49 51 54 48 49 52 48
Serum globulin 31 37 32 36 32 32 28 30 29 30 32 30 31 33 30
Serum albumin 18 30 26 27 27 24 22 22 20 20 21 20 21 22 18 18 19 18
Serum bilirubin 9 12 12 12 13 8 8 9 8 9 12 13 11 10 13 11
ALT 77 66 58 61 56 58 62 63 61 52 95 96 85 73 70
AST 69 47 44 53 44 59 59 59 51 38 103 101 89 84 71
ALP 585 894 754 866 776 790 721 708 649 645 1209 1195 1163 1384 1201
GGT 272 602 538 533 472 424 360 334 282 253 390 343 313 372 348

Differential diagnosis

A man presented to our hospital with postural hypotension and over 2 years of intermittent fevers and night sweats. He had persistent mediastinal lymphadenopathy and hepatosplenomegaly on imaging, with pancytopenia and elevated liver enzymes. Further metabolic panel showed elevated LDH and positive IgG serology for Epstein-Barr virus. Serial blood cultures were all negative.

Our differential diagnoses were malignant lymphoma, sarcoidosis, intracellular infection (mycobacterium, legionella) and haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis. Our primary differentials for infectious causes included tuberculosis (for which serology was negative), histoplasmosis and coccidiomycosis, however, these conditions are rare in Australia and our patient had not visited any endemic areas. To arrive at a definitive diagnosis among the diseases considered, positive serology/blood cultures and tissue biopsy for pathology are essential; however, two biopsies performed at our centre were inconclusive. After transfer to a larger metropolitan centre, a diagnosis of PTCL (NOS) was made from the results of a mediastinoscopy and percutaneous liver biopsy.

Outcome and follow-up

At time of writing, this patient is alive and under the care of a local haematologist. He had his first cycle of multiagent cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide, vincristine and prednisone chemotherapy in early May, and is scheduled to receive six cycles, followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation.

Shortly after his first chemotherapy cycle, he returned to our regional hospital with febrile neutropaenia complicated by Clostridium difficile colitis and oral candidiasis. On last review, 6 months postdiagnosis, he was continuing chemotherapy while living at home in the community.

Discussion

Current guidelines support pathological evaluation of tissue samples as being the most specific and sensitive test for diagnosis,1 2 but as seen in our case, this can be complicated. PTCL (NOS) often mimics many other conditions and can be difficult to distinguish from inflammation, benign hyperplasia, carcinomas, germ cell tumours or melanoma.

Using the keyword ‘PTCL, NOS’ and ‘case report’ in a PubMed search limited to articles on humans, published in English, with the full article available and published after the year 1990, we narrowed our search to 259 possible results. After further narrowing our search by including the keyword ‘case.m_titl.’, we were able to narrow the search to 89 cases. After excluding 57 articles from review of the title and abstract, we narrowed by reading a remaining 32 articles for content and ultimately included 18 case reports written in English and excluded 14 case reports. One report showed that among 15 cases of nodal PTCL, NOS, the clinical course was very aggressive with a median survival time of 3.5 months, and 10 patients died within 6 months of diagnosis.3 Liu et al report a case of PTCL presenting as rhabdomyolysis in a person who abused alcohol4; in another case, it presented as peripheral neuropathy compatible with subacute demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy.5 Franco et al reported two cases; in the first patient PTCL was identified early in a 52-year-old man who survived. In the second, a 24-year-old man with PTCL (NOS) was initially misdiagnosed as having an abdominal infection and ultimately died of disseminated intravascular coagulation leading to multiorgan failure.6 Similar diagnostic delays due to abnormal presentation were encountered by Singh et al,7 Sueyasu et al,8 Le Tourneau et al,9 Matsuda et al,10 Watanabe et al 11 and Smeltzer et al 12

In virtually all of these cases, the diagnosis was delayed or difficult due to atypical presentation of what is a notoriously heterogeneous disease. In 16 out of 19 cases, including our own, the diagnosis was difficult despite multiple biopsies from different sites. Given the aggressive clinical nature, if a rapidly progressive disease like PTCL is suspected, invasive biopsy procedures should not be delayed until the results of the other non-invasive specimens become available. If a diagnosis cannot be made from the initial pathological analysis, further specimens from the same organ may be required.

Learning points

  • Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) is a rare but aggressive clinical disease with a poor prognosis (overall survival in the absence of additional risk factors is 62.3% at 5 years, and 54.9% at 10 years), placing additional importance on early diagnosis and treatment in order to improve patient outcomes.

  • An inconclusive biopsy result is not a negative result; a high index of clinical suspicion for a diagnosis of PTCL in the rural setting should prompt consideration of urgent transfer to an institution equipped to make a diagnosis.

  • If a diagnosis cannot be made from one pathological analysis, further specimens may be required.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AKMNU personally giving thanks to Medicine, Radiology and Pathology department of Central Gippsland Health for their valuable support and also the Histopathologist from St,Vincent’s Hospital, Melbourne for their valuable contribution for this case study. CM and L-TH,write up the case and as a senior consultant, I have to supervise the whole process.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer