Swine-influenza (H1N1 influenza) mimicking a case of high altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPO)

  1. Vishal Jha 1 and
  2. Aditi Jha 2
  1. 1 Internal Medicine, 153 General Hospital, Ladakh, India
  2. 2 Anaesthesiology, 153 General Hospital, Ladakh, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Aditi Jha; aditi7087@gmail.com

Publication history

Accepted:21 May 2020
First published:21 Jun 2020
Online issue publication:21 Jun 2020

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

Here we present a case of a 37-year-old soldier of Indian Army, posted in high altitude area of Ladakh region (>4200 m), who after rejoining after a month leave, presented with dry cough, low-grade fever and dyspnoea on exertion while undergoing acclimatisation, and on examination, was detected to have hypoxaemia, fever and bilateral fine crepitations on chest auscultation. He was started on treatment for high altitude pulmonary oedema at a medical aid post, and later referred to General Hospital at Leh. The course of the illness was complicated by worsening hypoxaemia, continuous high-grade fever, leucopenia and hypotension. Focused medical history revealed that he had travelled to the state of Gujarat during his leave, where high incidence of H1N1 influenza was being reported during the ongoing pandemic. Oseltamivir was empirically started, in addition to parenteral antibiotics and he was started on inotropic support. In view of severe hypoxaemia, not responding to non-invasive ventilation, he was intubated and placed on mechanical ventilation. The patient turned out to be H1N1 positive and succumbed to his illness 3 days later.

Background

High altitude pulmonary oedema (HAPO) generally occurs above 2500 m (8000 feet) and the risk depends on individual susceptibility, altitude attained, rate of ascent and time spent at altitude. It begins with a subtle, non-productive cough, shortness of breath with exertion and difficulty walking uphill. Such non-specific symptoms are easily mistaken for a benign upper respiratory tract infection or attributed to normal breathlessness at altitude or exhaustion.1 On physical examination, tachycardia, tachypnoea and low-grade fever (up to 38°C) are common. Inspiratory crackles may be more prominent in the right middle lobe initially, but become bilateral and diffuse as HAPO progresses. Influenza-like illness (ILI) is defined as fever (temperature of 100°F (37.8°C) or greater) with cough or sore throat in the absence of a known cause other than influenza. Case definitions have been provided by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The signs and symptoms of influenza caused by pandemic H1N1 influenza A virus are similar to those of seasonal influenza. The initial presentation of HAPO can be very similar to influenza which brings to light, the importance of epidemiological history and knowledge of ongoing illness in the community. Humans are a mobile force and are exposed to different ecosystems and the diseases therein. It thus becomes important to approach a case with an open mind and re-evaluation of a case becomes imperative whenever the response to the given line of management does not bring expected results.

Case presentation

Our patient, a 37-year-old soldier of Indian Army, non-smoker with no known comorbidities, posted in high altitude area of Ladakh region of India (>4200 m) for the past 14 months, after finishing a month leave in the plains, returned by air and reached Leh on the same day. On the fourth day of his acclimatisation, he presented with dry cough, low-grade fever and dyspnoea on exertion. He denied any history of haemoptysis, expectoration, rigours, rash, chest pain or syncope. On examination, he was febrile with oral temperature of 101°F, pulse rate of 110 beats/min, respiratory rate 26 breaths/min and SpO2 of 70% while breathing ambient air which increased to 84% with oxygen by face mask at 5 L/min. His blood pressure (BP) was 110/70 mm Hg and there was no postural fall. The patient had respiratory distress and central cyanosis. There was no pallor, clubbing, pedal oedema, generalised lymphadenopathy or elevated Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP). On systemic examination, he had bilateral fine crepitations over infra scapular and axillary region. Rest of the systemic examination was unremarkable.

Investigations

The initial haemogram revealed haemoglobin (Hb)152 g/L, Total Leucocyte Count (TLC) 3900/cumm, Differential Leucocyte Count (DLC) P68 L27 M3 E2, platelets 168×109/L . His Liver Function Test and Renal Function Test were within normal limits. Chest X-ray done on admission (figure 1) revealed evidence of early pulmonary oedema and areas of non-homogenous opacities in right middle and lower zones. His ECG showed sinus tachycardia with normal axis and ST segments. There is no cardiology facility available in Leh; however, a bedside echocardiogram revealed a normal study. His viral markers including HBsAg, anti-HCV and HIV were negative. Blood cultures were despatched. Repeated chest X-ray revealed ‘reverse bat wing’ sign (figure 2) which are peripheral opacities of the lung. CT pulmonary angiography (figure 3) was done in view of atypical findings and persistent hypoxaemia with hypotension and convex pulmonary bay on chest X-ray which revealed normal pulmonary arteries, consolidation with peripheral predominance of bilateral lung fields. With a suspicion of H1N1 influenza, due to ongoing epidemic, further tests were ordered. Serum Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) was 318 U/L (100–190 U/L) and serum Creatinine Kinase (CK) 116 U/L (22–198 U/L). Nasopharyngeal swab was sent for H1N1 testing (rt-PCR) which came out positive. His absolute eosinophil count was 230/cumm (30–35/cumm).

Figure 1

Chest X-ray done on admission revealing early pulmonary oedema, areas of non-homogenous opacities in right middle and lower zones and convex pulmonary bay suggesting Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH).

Figure 2

Repeat chest X-ray revealed ‘reverse bat wing’ sign, caused due to peripheral opacities of the lung.

Figure 3

CT pulmonary angiogram revealing normal pulmonary arteries, consolidation with peripheral predominance of bilateral lung fields.

Differential diagnosis

Our hospital is located at Leh (>3500 m) and provides support to troops deployed in extreme high-altitude areas (often >7000 m) of Ladakh region. This hospital receives three to four cases of HAPO every day. Almost all of these cases are military and paramilitary troops, who are lowlanders and are deployed in high altitude for service. The first differential diagnosis in a lowlander, inducted to high altitude by air and presenting with dry cough and breathlessness, hypoxaemia and bilateral crepitations is HAPO. Our patient presented on the fourth day of arrival by air in high altitude, like all other cases of HAPO that we encounter. However, after starting treatment, there were some unusual findings like poor response to oxygen therapy, leucopenia, atypical X-ray findings which prompted us to dwell into his travel history and on the ongoing swine-influenza pandemic. Pulmonary thromboembolism, which is quite common in high altitude, was also kept in the differentials, and was prompted by persistent tachypnoea, tachycardia and hypoxaemia and ruled out by CT pulmonary angiography. Although extremely rare in this part of the country, other causes of atypical pneumonia like acute eosinophilic pneumonia, other viral and rickettsial infections were also considered.

Treatment

Our patient was initially started on treatment for HAPO, which is a common occurrence in soldiers recently inducted to high altitude by air and those undergoing acclimatisation. In HAPO, we expected dramatic improvement with oxygen and nifedipine; however, patient continued to be hypoxaemic and tachypnoeic and had to be placed on non-invasive ventilation. He had some atypical findings, not usually expected in HAPO like leucopenia, hypotension and atypical X-ray findings. Antibiotics namely pipperacillin-tazobactam, clarithromycin were started and the diagnosis was soon modified to HAPO complicated by pneumonia. Due to recent travel to H1N1 influenza epidemic area and findings of atypical pneumonia, on the very next day oseltamivir was started empirically and doxicycline was added to cover for rickettsial infection.

Outcome and follow-up

The patient continued to deteriorate and required high Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) support, despite which he remained hypoxaemic. In view of persistent hypoxaemia, he was intubated and placed on mechanical ventilation and inotropic support with norepinephrine was initiated to maintain systolic BP over 90 mm Hg. Patient was air-evacuated to a tertiary care hospital in plains for intensive care and further tests. He was continued on the same treatment and on mechanical ventilation. Despite all aggressive intensive care measures and broad coverage for atypical organisms, he succumbed to the complications after 3 days of his transfer. His H1N1 status later came out to be positive.

Discussion

HAPO generally occurs above 2500 m (8000 feet) and the risk depends on individual susceptibility, altitude attained, rate of ascent and time spent at altitude. At approximately 4500 m (14 800 feet) the incidence of HAPO ranges from 0.2% to 6%.2 HAPO is the abnormal accumulation of plasma and some red cells in the lung due to a breakdown in the pulmonary blood-gas barrier, triggered by hypobaric hypoxia. This breakdown develops from a number of maladaptive responses to the hypoxia encountered at higher altitudes, including poor ventilatory response, increased sympathetic tone, exaggerated and uneven pulmonary vasoconstriction (pulmonary hypertension), inadequate production of endothelial nitric oxide and overproduction of endothelin, many of which are genetically determined.3 The end result is a patchy accumulation of extravascular fluid in the alveolar spaces that impairs respiration and can, in severe cases, prove fatal. HAPO generally begins with a subtle, non-productive cough, shortness of breath with exertion and difficulty walking uphill. Such non-specific symptoms are easily mistaken for a benign upper respiratory tract infection or attributed to normal breathlessness at altitude or exhaustion.1 On physical examination, tachycardia, tachypnoea and low-grade fever (up to 38°C) are common. Inspiratory crackles may be more prominent in the right middle lobe initially, but become bilateral and diffuse as HAPO progresses. Chest radiography usually reveals characteristic patchy alveolar infiltrates, predominantly in the right central haemithorax, which become more confluent and bilateral as the illness progresses.4 Supplemental oxygen is first-line therapy for HAPO and should be provided in all treatment settings when available. ILI is defined as fever (temperature of 100°F (37.8°C) or greater) with cough or sore throat in the absence of a known cause other than influenza. Case definitions have been provided by the US CDC. The signs and symptoms of influenza caused by pandemic H1N1 influenza A virus are similar to those of seasonal influenza. Adults hospitalised with pandemic H1N1 influenza are more likely to have lower respiratory tract complications, shock/sepsis and organ failure than those with seasonal influenza. They are also more likely to be admitted to the intensive care unit, require mechanical ventilation or die. Young adults with pandemic H1N1 influenza are two to four times more likely to have severe outcomes than individuals of the same age with seasonal influenza.5 Many hospitalised patients have infiltrates suggestive of pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Other complications reported in patients with pandemic H1N1 influenza A infection includes neurological complications, myocarditis, renal insufficiency, rhabdomyolysis, haemophagocytic syndrome and multisystem organ failure.6 Rates of lymphopenia have varied among studies. Among 426 patients with confirmed pandemic H1N1 infection in China, lymphopenia occurred in 68% of adults and 92% of children.7 Elevations of creatine kinase levels were reported in some patients with severe illness, including one patient with severe rhabdomyolysis. Lactate dehydrogenase was elevated in all 16 patients with severe illness in one study.8 Common findings using chest radiography and/or chest tomography included patchy consolidation or ground glass opacities, with or without consolidation; there was a lower lung zone predominance and the most commonly affected regions were the peripheral and central perihilar areas.9 Nucleic acid amplification tests, such as reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), are the most sensitive and specific tests for the diagnosis of influenza virus infection. Hence, the initial signs and symptoms of HAPO and viral pneumonia like swine-influenza are very similar. Moreover, even the chest radiograph has similar scattered non-homogenous opacities I the lung fields with no zonal predominance. This makes the diagnosis very challenging, especially in peripheral hospitals located in high altitude areas. A peripheral high altitude hospital like ours receive on an average two to three cases of HAPO every day and in our PubMed search, we did not find any case of H1N1 pneumonia reported from high-altitude. An unsuspecting clinician may tend to misdiagnose viral pneumonia as routine HAPO and there are only few clinical pointers like poor response to supplemental O2, leuco/lymphopenia and of course travel and epidemiological history taking, which will clinch the diagnosis of a rare (in high altitude setting) and rapidly fatal disease like swine-influenza.

Learning points

  • One must remember the importance of epidemiological history and knowledge of ongoing illness in the community which may be a rare occurrence at the place of practice.

  • HAPO and viral pneumonia, both have very similar presentation namely cough, dyspnoea and hypoxaemia. Early radiological findings are also common.

  • Clinical pointers like continuous fever, poor response to supplemental O2 and leuco/lymphopenia can be important findings to differentiate one from the other. Re-evaluation and frequent revisits of a case becomes imperative whenever the response to the given line of management does not bring expected results.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @Addi_ty

  • Contributors VJ has contributed the original idea for this case report and drafted the initial manuscript. AJ has contributed to the editing and revision of the manuscript. Both the contributors were involved in the management of the case.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Next of kin consent obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer