Haemolytic anaemia: a consequence of COVID-19

  1. Memoona Jawed 1 , 2,
  2. Elizabeth Hart 3 and
  3. Malik Saeed 4
  1. 1 Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
  2. 2 Acute Medicine, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
  3. 3 Acute Medicine, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
  4. 4 Haematology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Memoona Jawed; memoona.jawed@nuh.nhs.uk

Publication history

Accepted:19 Oct 2020
First published:10 Dec 2020
Online issue publication:10 Dec 2020

Case reports

Case reports are not necessarily evidence-based in the same way that the other content on BMJ Best Practice is. They should not be relied on to guide clinical practice. Please check the date of publication.

Abstract

A man in his early 50s presented with jaundice, mild shortness of breath on exertion and dark urine. He had had coryzal symptoms 2 weeks prior to admission. Medical history included obstructive sleep apnoea and hypertension. His initial blood tests showed a mild hyperbilirubinaemia and acute kidney injury stage 1. Chest X-ray and CT pulmonary angiogram were negative for features suggestive of COVID-19. He later developed a drop in haemoglobin and repeat bloods showed markedly raised lactate dehydrogenase and positive direct antiglobulin test. These results were felt to be consistent with a haemolytic anaemia. A nasopharyngeal swab came back positive for COVID-19. We suspect the cause of his symptoms was an autoimmune haemolytic anaemia secondary to COVID-19 which has recently been described in European cohorts.

Background

The current COVID-19 pandemic has exposed health staff to a new and potentially fatal disease. It was initially described in the Chinese province of Hubei and has rapidly spread throughout the world.1 The current number of UK deaths is over 42 000.2 As time goes on, we are becoming more aware of the complications of this new disease. This includes renal failure, thrombosis, cardiomyopathy and the recently describe ‘long COVID-19’.3–6 There have been a few cases reports of autoimmune haemolytic anaemia (AIHA) associated with COVID-19.7 8 To the best of our knowledge, this is the first UK description of an AIHA associated with this viral infection. It is important to be aware that this is an atypical presentation of COVID-19 that may occur during the period of infectivity.

Case presentation

A man in his early 50s was admitted feeling non-specifically unwell for 5 days. His family had noticed a yellow discoloration in his eyes. His urine was dark and he had an episode of frank per rectum (PR) bleeding. He described a previous episode of PR bleeding 6 months prior to admission. He had had one episode of diarrhoea. He had coryzal symptoms 2 weeks prior to admission and was experiencing some shortness of breath on mild exertion.

Medical history included obstructive sleep apnoea and hypertension. He was not on any medication on admission. He had struggled with side effects from bisoprolol and ramipril for his hypertension. He had been prescribed aspirin and atorvastatin but he had stopped these medications. His blood pressure had not required treatment since October 2019.

His clinical examination was unremarkable except for mild jaundice. PR did not show blood or melaena. His blood pressure was 173/104 mm Hg, heart rate 110 beats/min, temperature 36.4°C, respiratory rate 20/min and O2 saturations 96% on room air.

Investigations

His initial blood tests are shown in tables 1 and 2: abnormal results are in bold.

Table 1

Blood results days 1–5

Table 1

Blood results days 1–5

Table 2

Additional investigations

CXR Lungs and pleural recesses are clear. Normal mediastinal contours.
ANA, anti-nucleur antibody; ANCA, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody; CK, cretainine kinase; CTPA, CT pulmonary angiogram; CXR, chest X-Ray; DAT, direct antiglobulin test; GBM, glomerular basement membrane ; G6PD, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase; Hb, haemoglobin.
CTPA There is no large volume of ground-glass change, consolidation and no pleural fluid.
There are no classical features of COVID-19.
Blood film Polychromasia. Rare basophilic stippling seen. Platelet anisocytosis with some large forms. Some neutrophil hypersegmentation
Parvo virus IgG positive, IgM negative
Mycoplasma IgM Negative
COVID-19 PCR Positive
ANA <400 weakly positive Presumed false positive
ANCA Negative
Anti-GBM Negative
CK 85 U/L
DAT Anti-C3D positive 2+ Anti IgG negative
Anti IgA negative
Anti IgM negative
AntiC3c negative
All others negative
Reticulocyte count × 109/L 124 206 259 306
Haptoglobin, g/L <0.30 <0.30
Urine PCR Normal
Ferritin, μg/L 2452 Acute phase reactant
B12, ng/L 420
Folate, μg/L 8.9
G6PD, U/gHb 9.3
Free kappa/lambda light chain ratio 26.97/26.60
1.01(normal)
No evidence of myeloma

Differential diagnosis

An AIHA was suspected because of symptomatic anaemia, evidence of ongoing haemolysis on the blood tests and a history of a viral infection. In addition, the history of reddish urine, a positive urine dipstick for blood and protein and AKI stage 1 on presentation could have been suggestive of acute pyelonephritis. Gilberts syndrome was considered because of the mild hyperbilirubinaemia on the initial blood tests and clinical suspicion of viral infection as suggested by his coryzal symptoms.

Given the other abnormalities found, a haemolytic anaemia was the most likely diagnosis.

Treatment

He was initially treated with intravenous fluids and his renal function recovered. No antibiotics were prescribed. For the first few days of his admission, haemoglobin (Hb) continued to fall before stabilising. There was no evidence of overt bleeding.

Our initial thoughts had been that he may have had an acute glomerulonephritis secondary to a streptococcal infection or that this was an early presentation of vasculitis. However, his renal function improved with intravenous fluids and his vasculitic profile came back as negative. Antistreptolysin titres (ASOT) were not performed. His shortness of breath was felt to be secondary to anaemia or secondary to a recent COVID-19 diagnosis. Haematology input was requested to investigate for the potential haemolytic anaemia.

On the third day of his admission, he developed a supraventricular tachycardia which responded to adenosine 6 mg. Bisoprolol was initiated following this with the patients agreement.

Outcome and follow-up

Over the following days, his clinical picture improved with intravenous fluids and simple analgesia. The Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) was treated as above and the haematological investigations suggested a haemolytic anaemia. His blood pressure on discharge was 114/56 mm Hg. An outpatient flexible sigmoidoscopy was also organised to investigate the two episodes of PR bleeding.

His general practitioner kindly repeated his blood tests after discharge. Table 3 shows the improvement in Hb back towards baseline.

Table 3

Blood results day 9–35

Day 9 Day21 Day 35
Hb, haemoglobin.
Hb g/L 96 120 133
×109/L 8.84 8.14 9.18
Platelets ×109/L 315 263 238

Discussion

Our patient presented with a features suggestive of haemolysis with mild jaundice, anaemia and dark urine. AIHA is an acquired haemolysis in which the host’s immune system attacks its own red cell antigens. The incidence reported is approximately 1 per 100 000/year. Serologically, cases are divided into warm, cold or mixed types.9 Patients may present with symptoms of anaemia such as dizziness, tiredness and dyspnoea, or evidence of haemolysis with jaundice and dark urine.10

Typical laboratory findings of AIHA are anaemia, which may be absent in cases of mild haemolysis. The white blood cells and platelets are usually normal but leucopoenia or leucocytosis may be seen due to viral infection or a bone marrow disorder. On a blood film, red blood cell agglutination and spherocytosis may be apparent. The reticulocyte count is usually increased but may be normal in cases of a very short duration of haemolysis or with an underlying bone marrow disorder. LDH and bilirubin levels may be raised and haptoglobin levels may be reduced, as here, however COVID-19 can also increase LDH levels which could affect the interpretation. If the direct antiglobulin test is positive, it indicates the presence of complement (C3d) attached to red blood cell membrane and immunoglobulins IgG, IgM, IgA .9 Urine dipstick may be positive for blood but negative for erythrocytes.

There are a number of causes of AIHA. These include autoimmune, viral, lymphoproliferative disorders and immunodeficiency states. In our patient, there was nothing to suggest malignancy and the resolution without any specific treatment makes an ongoing autoimmune cause less likely. Haemolysis secondary to viral infections is a common finding. Our patient also had negative mycoplasma IgM and negative parvo virus IgM both of which are common causes of cold AIHA. The PR bleeding had occurred before and was not felt to be relevant to his current presentation.

Two papers have previously described haemolysis secondary to COVID-19. The first paper describes a woman with underlying congenital thrombocytopenia who required steroids to treat her warm AIHA.7 The second paper describes seven patients who presented with symptomatic COVID-19 and developed signs of warm or cold haemolysis on average 9 days after admission. All required treatment with either steroids or transfusion.8

Our patient did not present with features typical of COVID-19, although he had coryzal symptoms 2 weeks before presentation. Based on this history, a COVID-19 swab was sent which came back positive. The interpretation of this result could be contentious. While low rates of false positive tests are reported, there is evidence that PCR may remain positive for many weeks after infection. As this test is PCR based rather than based on viral culture, it is not possible to comment on whether the virus is viable or dead. It is therefore not clear how long people may remain infectious for after COVID-19.11 An antibody test may have added additional evidence of a prior infection but it is also evident that some people who have had typical COVID-19 symptoms do not produce an antibody response.12

There was no other cause found that could explain the features of an AIHA. He did not require any specific treatment. Awareness should be maintained to identify possible presentations of COVID-19 complications.

Patient’s perspective

Our patient kindly gave his permission to publish this case report but did not wish to make further comments.

Learning points

  • Haemolytic anaemia may be a complication of COVID-19.

  • It is important to be aware of late presentations so that patients who are potentially still infectious have appropriate infection control precautions.

  • There may be other late manifestations of COVID-19 that become obvious as our experience of this disease increases.

Footnotes

  • Contributors MJ has written the initial case report and literature review. EH has reviewed and edited the case report. MS has reviewed it from haematolgy perspective.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

This article is made freely available for use in accordance with BMJ’s website terms and conditions for the duration of the covid-19 pandemic or until otherwise determined by BMJ. You may use, download and print the article for any lawful, non-commercial purpose (including text and data mining) provided that all copyright notices and trade marks are retained.

https://bmj.com/coronavirus/usage

References

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer