The word 'logrank' in the headings of Figure 2 is a mistake caused by
us not changing the default settings of the plotting programme. I
apologise for any confusion.
The percentage of deaths for the Wilcox group should be 6.3, rather
than 8.9. There are a couple of errors like this, which were pointed out
at the proofs stage, but unfortunately they have not been corrected. If
anybody wants the corrected totals, then I can supply them.
However, as the paper is about where forest plots came from, rather
than about beta-blockers and mortality, these small errors should not
detract from the overall message.
Rapid Response:
Re: Logrank?
The word 'logrank' in the headings of Figure 2 is a mistake caused by
us not changing the default settings of the plotting programme. I
apologise for any confusion.
The percentage of deaths for the Wilcox group should be 6.3, rather
than 8.9. There are a couple of errors like this, which were pointed out
at the proofs stage, but unfortunately they have not been corrected. If
anybody wants the corrected totals, then I can supply them.
However, as the paper is about where forest plots came from, rather
than about beta-blockers and mortality, these small errors should not
detract from the overall message.
Competing interests: No competing interests