We should push for non-police alternatives to mental health crisis response
BMJ 2023; 382 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.p1935 (Published 24 August 2023) Cite this as: BMJ 2023;382:p1935Linked Editorial
Police in England and Wales step back from mental healthcare
In May 2023 the Metropolitan Police commissioner, Mark Rowley, wrote a letter to health and social care services announcing the Metropolitan Police’s withdrawal from 999 calls related to mental health incidents from 31 October this year. Rowley said that patients were being failed by the process of sending police officers instead of medical professionals to people in a mental health crisis1—and I couldn’t agree more.
At present, police officers possess unique legal powers under the Mental Health Act. These enable them to transport someone in a state of mental health crisis to a place of safety for assessment by a mental health professional. Although this represents only one facet of police involvement in mental health services, it’s by far the greatest form of police presence that our patients experience.
As a trainee psychiatrist I witness the impact on patients of being restrained by police officers, handcuffed, and brought to a psychiatric facility in the back of a police car. Some are left too terrified to speak to me or to enter the assessment room, and they’re highly vigilant against mental health staff out of fear that we’ll treat them in the same way as the police if they don’t comply. For others—many of them young, working class Black men—the encounter is reminiscent of a lifetime of racial profiling and being stopped and searched by the police, rendering their contact with mental health services traumatic from the outset.2
These fears and experiences are far from unfounded and arise from a context of institutional racism across the police force, where Black people in England and Wales are subject to 25% of police use of firearms, 16% use of police restraint, and 8% of deaths in police custody, despite comprising only 3% of the population.34 This disproportionate use of force is compounded by mental illness: Elish Angiolini’s damning report on deaths and serious incidents in police custody found that almost half of deaths in policy custody involved individuals experiencing a mental health crisis, many involving types of force and restraint inappropriate to use on vulnerable people in a state of crisis.5 This is even more worrying when we consider that Black people are more likely to undergo a mental health admission via the police.6
Some people argue that by criminalising some harms and not others, and by criminalising some non-harms, policing protects the same racist power hierarchies that produce poverty, death, and disease and that policing should therefore have no role in a healthy, equal society.7 Police presence in medical institutions creates a barrier to people from marginalised groups seeking help, and it can lead to the criminalisation of mental illness.8 It’s not simply unfortunate, but predictable, that Black and racially minoritised people will find themselves disproportionately on the receiving end of police involvement.
Investment and reform
What could emergency mental healthcare look like without policing? Real world examples testify to the success of removing the police from mental health services. The Cahoots programme in Oregon, USA, pairs medical professionals in a mobile crisis team model responding to 911 calls instead of the police. This programme has been running since 1989 and has substantially reduced the need for police presence in an acute mental health crisis.9
Similar first responder models that don’t rely on the police have reduced the proportion of people in crisis being transferred to hospital.10 The Gerstein Centre in Toronto, Canada, offers a non-clinical and non-coercive crisis response model of peer support workers and non-clinicians trained in non-violent de-escalation techniques to contain people in crisis without resorting to the police or involuntary hospital admission.11
It’s not enough, however, to simply remove the police from the equation and leave those in crisis trapped in a mire of the social determinants in which their mental illness is rooted. Shifting the responsibility for responding to people in a mental health crisis away from the police requires investment in public health and community mental health services, social care, housing, and education. It will require sustained efforts to tackle poverty, social inequality, and structural racism.
Rowley’s decision reflects chronic underfunding of police services and workforce shortages across the UK’s public sector. But it represents a great opportunity. Instead of pushing to continue with a broken model of care, the Royal College of Psychiatrists should be seizing this moment to push for funding and research into non-police alternatives to crisis response.12 Despite the socioeconomic climate that our mental health services are navigating, we face what could be the beginning of removing the police presence from emergency mental healthcare—and we shouldn’t squander it.
Footnotes
Competing interests: MI is a member of MedAct, a public health charity that campaigns on political issues in healthcare, of which policing is one, but she does not make any money from this or hold any positions in the organisation.
Provenance and peer review: not commissioned, not peer reviewed.