Former GP is suspended for five months over protests to end fossil fuel extraction
BMJ 2024; 385 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.q940 (Published 24 April 2024) Cite this as: BMJ 2024;385:q940
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
Dear Editor outrageous action by GMC- demonstrating how out of touch they are and no awareness of the most major public health crisis there has and ever will be. #DefundtheGMC. This was not a fit to practice matter, it shows archaic backward looking dinosaurs they are. What have THEY done to protect this huge public health and wider issue?
Competing interests: No competing interests
Dear Editor
Don’t shoot the messenger.
I am angry that Dr Sarah Benn has been suspended from the medical register for 5 months by the GMC. She was demonstrating against government policy on climate change. The GMC refused to consider Dr Benn’s motivation, which was impeccable. Our collapsing climate is a terrifying and avoidable public health disaster but what is even more terrifying is an institution such as the GMC supporting the polluting status quo. I repeat: they discounted her motivation. This is inhuman nonsense. Sarah Benn is one of a tiny number of Doctors who have the courage to act in the face of an awful truth rather than complain but carry on regardless. Doctors, especially those in elevated positions, should speak the truth, especially when it is uncomfortable. It is an outrageous dereliction of duty to remain silent in the face of probably the worst public health threat there has ever been. Doctors such as Sarah Benn who are willing to take a personal stand and make personal sacrifices to expose destructive entrenched power deserve support not sanction.
I know Sarah and there can be no doubt at all as to her integrity. Thousands of doctors talk and express their opinions on the climate but most of us remain polite, compliant and scared to risk our own privileges. It is negligent to watch politely as powerful, profitable polluters ignore the risks and continue to increase emissions. It is naive to think that entrenched power will change without legislative force. We have to be honest: our current political system is both immune to scientific fact and is failing to take care of us. Action, as taken by Dr Benn, disturbs the status quo and demands discussion of the terrible realities of climate collapse. Her single handed action has stimulated massive public debate. The climate crisis is a health crisis and the medical profession must challenge the profitable, polluting status quo. Doctors should teach. We have a duty to challenge established power and established money that distort our politics and our media. Let’s be honest, they also distort our medical establishment. When the system is failing, truthful voices such as Sarah’s will inevitably and properly be disruptive.
For a better future we have to disrupt the present. Our climate is collapsing, the pace is dizzying and the time left is approaching zero. Yet global emissions continue to rise and every fossil fuel producing country including the UK plans to increase production. The fossil fuel narrative that “all is well” is gaining ground. Systematic misinformation abounds despite the overwhelming evidence that “normal life” is irreversibly wrecking all that we need and cherish. Doctors must stand up to complicit, morally suspect institutions, including medical institutions such as the GMC, if they refuse to respect and support remarkable doctors who are willing to make bold public acts of conscience. As Doctors it is our duty to support colleagues such as Sarah Benn who expose truth to power.
We all need to be more like Sarah. We face bigger risks when good people remain silent than when bad people do their worst. We must stand with those that stand up to be counted. Anything less than this is cowardice.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Dear Editor
The suspension of a former GP, Dr Sarah Benn, by GMC over the issue of climate change protests is very deeply disturbing. The case is completely unrelated to her ability to provide safe and competent patient care.[1]. Regretfully, the medical tribunal, presumably under narrow legal advice, has inadvertently strayed into sanctioning political acts and beliefs.
Even the ardent climate change sceptics would grudgingly accept that the beliefs of Just-Stop-Oil protestors qualify as political beliefs. A cursory reading of the contrasting coverage of the Just-Stop-Oil protests in Guardian and Daily Mail newspapers makes it very obvious that the protests are political in nature.[2] [3].
Civil disobedience and courting arrest is the cornerstone of political activism all over the world. Lawbreaking is often an inherent part of civil disobedience.[4].
Article 11 of Human Rights Act protects the right to protest by holding meetings and demonstrations. The act doesn’t explicitly state that the protests need to be always lawful.
In Dr Benn’s case, GMC unfortunately gives the impression of trying to influence the political acts and beliefs of doctors. In particular, Sarah Benn refusing to remediate her conduct means that she is not changing her political beliefs under the threat of sanction. The sanction could be construed as an infringement of her human rights just because she is a doctor.[1].
After the Bristol scandal, everyone has accepted that more intense scrutiny of doctors is absolutely essential.[5]. But this case involving political beliefs and the previous Manjula Arora Laptop case, indicate that the pendulum has swung too far the other way.[6]. Medical regulation is now broader in scope than originally intended by parliament. Reform of medical regulation is urgently needed.
All doctors and BMA should urge GMC to refrain from regulating political acts and rescind the sanctions on Dr Benn immediately.
References
1 Dyer C. Former GP is suspended for five months over protests to end fossil fuel extraction. BMJ. 2024;385:q940.
2 Lynskey D. Just Stop Oil: behind the scenes with the activists. The Observer. 2022.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2022/apr/10/just-stop-oil-behind... (accessed 28 April 2024)
3 Anderson N. Ministers and police chiefs urge judges to send Just Stop Oil protesters to jail | Daily Mail Online. Daily Mail. 2023. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12281805/Ministers-police-chief... (accessed 28 April 2024)
4 Chow PYS. The Change in Judicial Practice in Cases Concerning Civil Disobedience Protests and its Constitutional Significance. The Modern Law Review. 2023;86:927–50.
5 Smith R. All changed, changed utterly: British medicine will be transformed by the Bristol case. BMJ. 1998;316:1917–8.
6 Abbasi K. Accountable to no one, upsetting everyone: the GMC must be reformed. BMJ. 2022;379:o2700.
Competing interests: My personal view is that Just-Stop-Oil protestors alienated public by causing disproportionate inconvenience to law abiding citizens. But I fully support their democratic and political right to protest anywhere and face legal consequences as a member of the Public.
Re: Former GP is suspended for five months over protests to end fossil fuel extraction
Dear Editor
Originally (1987) qualified and registered in Germany (current), having been registered with the GMC (then Overseas List until that was discontinued), and registered in Namibia (current), I read occasionally MPTS judgements. While obviously the majority are quite in order, even necessary, I regularly note cases that should never have been brought and judgements which are inappropriately harsh.
This case qualifies on the former count in the first place, but while this “climate-glueing” colleague is not affected by the sentence as she is no longer practising, it is chilling given the way protesters are being dealt with currently in the UK (and elsewhere).
A proper slap on the wrist would have been 32 days of suspension, preferably to have been served during the incarceration.
Competing interests: No competing interests