Intended for healthcare professionals

Editorials

Radical transparency in post-market oversight of medicine safety

BMJ 2022; 379 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o2275 (Published 05 October 2022) Cite this as: BMJ 2022;379:o2275

Linked Research

Characterization and corroboration of safety signals identified from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System

  1. Barbara Mintzes, associate professor1,
  2. Colleen Fuller, health policy consultant2
  1. 1School of Pharmacy and Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
  2. 2Independent Voices for Safe and Effective Drugs, Vancouver, BC, Canada
  1. Correspondence to: B Mintzes Barbara.mintzes{at}sydney.edu.au

Regulators should publish all evidence underlying their responses to safety signals

When medicines are first marketed, knowledge of rare serious harmful effects is limited, because generally too few people are exposed, trials are too brief, and vulnerable groups such as elderly people have been excluded.1 Harm from medicine use is an important public health concern, leading to many potentially preventable hospital admissions and deaths.234 Early signals of serious harm, supported by evidence and acted on promptly, could lead to improved patient and public health.

In a linked paper (doi:10.1136/bmj-2022-071752), Dhodapkar and colleagues analysed 12 years of safety signals identified within the US Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).5 They asked how often these signals resulted in regulatory actions and whether they were corroborated by additional research. The 2007 FDA Amendments Act requires that the FDA publish quarterly reports of safety signals identified in FAERS.6 This requirement is a welcome step, ensuring ongoing data mining for signals and rapid public …

View Full Text

Log in

Log in through your institution

Subscribe

* For online subscription