Research News Having a named GP doesn’t improve older patients’ continuity of care, finds study BMJ 2019; 366 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5682 (Published 24 September 2019) Cite this as: BMJ 2019;366:l5682 Article Related content Metrics Responses Peer review Related articles Letter Having a named doctor in general practice is not enough to improve continuity of care Published: 24 October 2019; BMJ 367 doi:10.1136/bmj.l6106 See more Trump U turns on scrapping of US’s largest women’s health study BMJ April 25, 2025, 389 r831; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r831 Fall in patient satisfaction in England is linked to fewer GPs and less face-to-face contact, research finds BMJ April 23, 2025, 389 r808; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r808 BMA loses case over GMC’s use of “medical professional” to describe associates BMJ April 23, 2025, 389 r800; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r800 Mitigating the harms of politics and industry BMJ April 17, 2025, 389 r768; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r768 Prostate cancer: Could polygenic risk scores make national screening a reality? BMJ April 15, 2025, 389 r763; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.r763 Cited by... Having a named doctor in general practice is not enough to improve continuity of careFulltext PDF
