Mental illness is not a state of mind
BMJ 2016; 355 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i5333 (Published 05 October 2016) Cite this as: BMJ 2016;355:i5333
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
.
I agree with Marta Balinska that people with mental illness need help and should not just be told to get on with it.1 Mental illness is due to altered brain chemistry. For example, THINK ZINC because homeostatic maintenance of normal range zinc levels is crucial for normal brain development and function.2 Zinc is also essential for the normal functioning of every cell in the body and is the commonest essential nutrient deficiency in my clinical experience. Both psychological stress and hormone use can lower zinc levels and raise the copper to zinc ratio which increases adverse reactions to foods and chemicals.3
Our discovery in the 1960s, that depressive mood changes and loss of libido affected 10% to 44% of women taking oral contraceptives and was most frequent with strongly progestogenic OCs containing lower doses of oestrogen, has been mostly ignored - probably for world overpopulation reasons. Powerfully progestogenic hormonal contraceptives can increase endometrial glandular monoamine oxidase levels continuously.4 Monoamine oxidase activity is high in the endometrium, platelets, and brain, for a few days only during the short premenstrual phase of an ovulatory cycle when premenstrual tension (which can have very serious consequences for some women) is common.5 Monoamine inhibitor drugs have long been used as antidepressants.
Unsurprisingly, a recent NHS mental health survey found that 26% of young women aged 16 to 24 are suffering from mental health problems compared with 9.1% of young men.6 As oestrogen doses were lowered or removed in hormonal contraceptives in an attempt to lower the risk of venous thromboembolic disease, the incidence of depression or anxiety and weight gain increased in young women. Deaths from suicides, accidents or violence are the commonest causes of death in current users of hormonal contraception.7
1 Balinska M. Mental illness is not a state of mind. BMJ 2016;355:i5333
2 Tyszka-Czochara M, Grzywacz A, Gdula-Argasińska J, Librowski T, Wiliński B, Opoka W. The role of zinc in the pathogenesis and treatment of central nervous system (CNS) diseases. Implications of zinc homeostasis for proper CNS function. Acta Pol Pharm. 2014 May-Jun;71(3):369-77.
3 Grant ECG. The pill, hormone replacement therapy, vascular and mood over-reactivity, and mineral imbalance .J Nutr Environ Med 1998;8:105-116
4 Grant ECG, Pryce Davies J. Effect of oral contraceptives on depressive mood changes and on endometrial monoamine oxidase and phosphatases. BMJ 1968;3:777-80.
5 Robinson DS, Davies JM, Nies A, Ravaris CL, Sylwester D. Relation of sex and aging to monoamine oxidase activity of human brain,plasma, and platelets. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1971;24(6):536-539.
6 Digital NHS. Mental health and wellbeing in England: Adult psychiatric morbidity survey 2014. September 2016. http://content.digital.nhs.uk/searchcatalogue?productid=21938&topics=0%2....
7 Beral V, Hermon C, Kay C, et al. Mortality in relation to method of follow-up in the Royal College of General Practitioners’ Oral Contraception Study. In: Hannaford PC, Webb AMC, eds. Evidence guided Prescribing of the Pill. New York: Parthenon Publishing, 1996.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Re: Mental illness is not a state of mind
The author’s view that the ‘pathological’ state of mental illness must be distinguished from the ‘normal’ one of existential hardship is highly problematic. I’m concerned that this article serves only to exacerbate several misunderstandings about mental illness which prevail amongst healthcare professionals and members of the public.
From a practical point of view, the fact that antidepressant medication, antipsychotic medication, and cognitive/behavioural interventions all have the same effects in mentally ‘healthy’ individuals as in those who have been assigned a psychiatric diagnostic label1,2,3,4 shows that trying to divide the mentally well from the mentally unwell is at the very least a therapeutically useless exercise, whether or not it is a scientifically valid one. All of our currently available treatments for mental illness ameliorate symptoms; they do not cure disease.
The author suggests that the mentally unwell can be identified as those who demonstrate an inability to “adapt correspondingly to their surroundings and circumstances” and whose “objective reality is not distorted by their perceptions”. Even if it were useful or valid to make such a distinction, who should determine whether a distressed person’s response is appropriate or their perception is non-distorted? It should be noted that the Oxford English Dictionary defines ‘objective’ as “not dependent on the mind for existence”5, meaning that no human being can ever pronounce ‘objectively’ on such matters.
In addition, the author’s statements that “Someone with major depressive disorder or psychosis is not going to get better simply by meditating or going for a brisk walk” and “I do not think that bipolar depression or psychosis can be substantially alleviated by words or behavioural advice” are also problematic, because the former is incorrect and the latter appears to be an opinion which is at odds with the available evidence. There is insufficient evidence to make definitive statements on the effect of exercise on major depressive disorder or the effect of cognitive/behavioural interventions on bipolar depression (although it would appear that psychological therapy is likely to reduce the probability of relapse in bipolar disorder by 40%6). However, there is ample meta-analytic evidence that mindfulness meditation produces symptom reduction in major depressive disorder and psychosis7,8,9,10, as well as that cognitive/behavioural interventions produce symptom reduction in psychosis11,12,13. Of note, the effect sizes for these interventions are similar to or greater than those of antidepressant14 and antipsychotic15 medication. Whether or not one considers these benefits to constitute ‘getting better’ or ‘substantial alleviation’ is, of course, a matter of opinion.
The author’s overarching concern – that suffering due to psychological experiences is often minimised by people in our society – is one that I share and am bothered by on an almost daily basis. However, there is accumulating evidence that labelling sufferers as ‘diseased’ and therefore ‘abnormal’ is not only unhelpful but is in fact harmful – it causes distress to sufferers16 and increases negative attitudes towards them17.
Given the current state of scientific evidence pertaining to the mechanisms of mental illness, I think a more nuanced view is required. When we suffer from mental illness we are neither ‘overreacting’ nor ‘diseased’ – due to associations learned during previous experiences and influenced by our genotype, our brains often react to thoughts and events in ways which might ultimately lead to distress and functional impairment.
1 Seretti, A., et al., 2010. Antidepressants in healthy subjects: what are the psychotropic/psychological effects? European Neuropsychopharmacology, 20, pp.433-453.
2 Healy, D. & Farquhar, G., 1998. The immediate effects of droperidol. Human Psychopharmacology, 13, pp.113-120.
3 Malouff, J.M., et al., 2007. The efficacy of problem solving therapy in reducing mental and physical health problems: a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, pp.46-57.
4 Mazzucchelli, T.G., et al., 2010. Behavioural activation interventions for well-being: a meta-analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(2), pp.105-121.
5 Oxford University Press, 2016. Oxford Dictionary of English [online] Available at: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/objective
6 Scott, J., et al., 2007. A meta-analysis of relapse rates with adjunctive psychological therapies compared to usual psychiatric treatment for bipolar disorders. The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 10(1), pp.123-129.
7 Khoury, B., et al., 2013. Mindfulness interventions for psychosis: a meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research, 150, pp.176-184.
8 Chiesa, A. & Seretti, A., 2011. Mindfulness based cognitive therapy for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research, 187(3), pp.441-453.
9 Klainin-Yobas, P., et al., 2012. Efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions on depressive symptoms among people with mental disorders: a meta-analysis. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(1), pp.109-121.
10 Piet, J. & Hougaard, E., 2011. The effect of mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for prevention of relapse in recurrent major depressive disorder: A systematic review a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, pp.1032-1040.
11 Zimmerman, G., et al., 2005. The effect of cognitive behavioural treatment on the positive symptoms of schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a meta-analysis. Schizophrenia Research, 77(1), pp.1-9.
12 Pfammatter, M., et al., 2006. Efficacy of psychological therapy in schizophrenia: conclusions from meta-analyses. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32(1), pp.S64-S80.
13 Wykes, T., et al., 2008. Cognitive behaviour therapy for schizophrenia: effect sizes, clinical models, and methodological rigour. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34(3), pp.523-527.
14 Hieronymous, F., et al., 2016. Consistent superiority of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors over placebo in reducing depressed mood in patients with major depression. Molecular Psychiatry, 21(4), pp.523-530.
15 Leucht, S., et al., 2013. Comparative efficacy and tolerability of 15 antipsychotic drugs in schizophrenia: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Lancet, 382, pp.951-962.
16 Beresford, P., et al., 2016. From mental illness to a social model of madness and distress. London: Shaping Our Lives.
17 Angermeyer, M.C., et al., 2011. Biogenetic explanations and public acceptance of mental illness: a systematic review of population studies. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(5), pp.367-372.
Competing interests: No competing interests