Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
I have asked before with no response who decided that we all have to do child safeguarding level 3 every year. Is there any evidence this will reduce missed preventable harm to children, or would the resources spent on this process be better used?
It is ironic that there are so many questionable mandatory re training hurdles we have to jump through but not any on things like anticoagulation in af, or the marginal benefit of the plethora of new inhalers and diabetic drugs.
But who makes things mandatory?
I have asked before with no response who decided that we all have to do child safeguarding level 3 every year. Is there any evidence this will reduce missed preventable harm to children, or would the resources spent on this process be better used?
It is ironic that there are so many questionable mandatory re training hurdles we have to jump through but not any on things like anticoagulation in af, or the marginal benefit of the plethora of new inhalers and diabetic drugs.
Competing interests: No competing interests