The management of chronic breathlessness in patients with advanced and terminal illness
BMJ 2015; 349 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g7617 (Published 02 January 2015) Cite this as: BMJ 2015;349:g7617
All rapid responses
Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed. Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles. The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not including references and author details. We will no longer post responses that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
The review of the care of breathless patients by Ekstrom, Abernethy and Currow was admirably informative. Having been a Physician for forty years and now a breathless patient I would strongly recommend that respiratory care teams advise the patients and their families about the great value of aids to daily living. Although the aids can seem costly they give enormous improvement to the quality of life.
The most frequently recognized is the installation of a stair chair lift. Equally valuable is a mobility scooter which can allow the patient to go shopping for essential purchases and also give the patient an opportunity to see what life is like outside the home, real experience which is so much better than television. Independent mobility also allows patients to go out to meet their personal friends. Generally buses and taxis are obliged to accept mobility scooters. Western countries have generally passed legislation requiring public places to provide wheel chair access. Sadly train companies and underground train services lag behind installing access adaptions and they need pressure from the Medical Professions.
Competing interests: No competing interests
The review of the management of chronic breathlessness in advanced disease was timely and welcome. As the authors point out, chronic refractory breathlessness has long been recognised as a major cause of human suffering and health care expenditure (1, 2, 3). The latter may be futile, with frequent admissions to hospital out of hours triggered when anxiety about breathlessness episodes distresses both patient and carer beyond bearing. In the current hospital environment, and with the pressures in primary care, insufficient attention is often paid to active management of psychosocial issues such as anxiety, depression, carer stress and distress, and to the implementation of non-pharmacological self-management strategies such as physical and mental activity, relaxation techniques, breathing exercises, education and information. The recommendation both for comprehensive palliative care and attention to psychosocial issues was welcome but we would contend that these were not explained in enough detail for the general medical reader to take them forward (4) nor given enough emphasis for their value to be recognised. It would also be helpful for the general medical reader to know that the sensation is mediated through the CNS (5) to understand the rationale for these techniques which reduce the impact of the sensation of breathlessness even when it cannot be removed. Disproportionate space was used to explain the role and limitations of the minimally effective oxygen and partially effective opioids (most useful in the severe chronic refractory breathlessness) when there is good evidence (and more emerging) of the effectiveness of non-drug interventions such as the hand-held fan (6) – which, as the authors point out, has no ill effects, can increase self efficacy and promote activity as it shortens the period of breathlessness. It would have been helpful to outline these helpful non-drug approach in more detail, in on-line supplements at least, in an article to help clinicians practically improve the care of breathless patients. The on-line references are noted.
The terms non-pharmacological, complex intervention and palliative care encompass a wide range of psychosocial interventions that can play an important role in reducing suffering, improving the quality of care and reducing the costs of successfully helping people living with chronic refractory breathlessness. What they entail may not be immediately apparent to general readers.
Rigorous mixed methods data from a number of studies (1, 2,7, 8, 9, 10), carried out over ten or more years have demonstrated again the psychosocial distress associated with chronic refractory breathlessness and the possibilities for relieving them:the hand-held fan, emotional and practical support for carers (who bear significant physical and psychological burdens, sometimes over many years), designing rituals to help individuals manage episodes of frightening breathlessness, education and individualised exercise training. The emphasis on pulmonary rehabilitation was welcome - it is unevenly provided and, in some areas, not available to those who do not have COPD. A recent RCT in patients with advanced cancer (10) has shown that pre-dominantly non-pharmacological complex interventions for breathlessness is not only clinically helpful beyond normal care, but also cost-effective. Given the current interest in ‘patient activation’ to self-manage chronic conditions, we feel that these need greater emphasis and welcome the authors’ call for more research to help the millions of people affected by this distressing symptom.
Sara Booth, Honorary Associate Lecturer and Consultant, c/o Elsworth House, Cambridge University Hospitals NHSFT
Morag Farquhar, Senior Research Associate & NIHR Career Development Fellow, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, University of Cambridge,
Anna Spathis, Consultant Physician in Palliative Medicine, CUHNHSFT
Claudia Bausewein, Professor of Palliative Medicine, University of Munich
Chloe Chin, ACF CUHNHSFT
Kyle Pattinson, Associate Professor, Senior Clinical Research Fellow, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford
1 Booth S, Silverster S, Todd C. Breathlessness in cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Using a qualitative approach to describe the experience of patients and carers Palliative and Supportive CareDecember 2003 (4) 337-344
2 Seamark DA, Blake SA, Seamark CJ, Halpin DMG Living with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): perceptions of patients and their carers An interpretative phenomenological analysis Med October 2004 vol. 18 no. 7 619-625
3 Johnson M, Currow D, Booth S Prevalence and assessment of breathlessness in the clinical setting Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine April 2014, Vol. 8, No. 2 , Pages 151-161 (doi:10.1586/17476348.2014.879530)
4 Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide, BMJ 2014;348:g1687 4
5 Herigstad M, Hayen A, Wiech K, Pattinson KT. Dyspnoea and the brain. Respir Med. 2011 Jun;105(6):809-17
6 Galbraith S, Fagan, P, Perkins P, Lynch A, Booth S. Does the use of a handheld fan improve chronic dyspnea? A randomized, controlled, crossover trial. Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 May;39(5):831-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.09.024.
7 Booth S, Farquhar M, Gysels M, Bausewein C, Higginson IJ. The impact of a breathlessness intervention service (BIS) on the lives of patients with intractable dyspnoea: a qualitative Phase I study. Palliative and Supportive Care 2006; 4: 287-93.
8 Farquhar M, Higginson IJ, Fagan P, Booth S. Results of a pilot investigation into a complex intervention for breathlessness in advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): brief report. Palliative and Supportive Care 2010;8(2): 143-9.
9 Booth S, Moffat C, Farquhar M, Higginson IJ, Bausewein C, Burkin J. Developing a breathlessness service for patients with palliative and supportive care needs, irrespective of diagnosis. Journal of Palliative Care 2011;27(1): 28-36.
10 Farquhar M, Prevost AT, McCrone P, Brafman-Price B, Bentley A, Higginson IJ, Todd C, Booth S. Is a specialist breathlessness service more effective and cost-effective for patients with advanced cancer and their carers than standard care? Findings of a mixed method randomised controlled trial. BMC Medicine 2014 12:194.
Competing interests: No competing interests
Considering the drug treatment of subjective dyspnoea, the authors did not mention the possible role of antihstamines, notably promethazine.
There is some old research out there suggesting probable benefit. The drug is safer than opiates, with fewer complications likely, and I would suggest worth a try. I often use it in Primary Care and and some patients appear to benefit greatly.
To quote Woodcock et al "Promethazine reduced breathlessness and improved exercise tolerance without altering lung function."
Promethazine is a safe and useful option in management dyspnoea in those approaching end of life.
Reference:
A A Woodcock, E R Gross, D M Geddes. Drug treatment of breathlessness: contrasting effects of diazepam and promethazine in pink puffers. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). Aug 1, 1981; 283(6287): 343–346. http://www.bmj.com/content/283/6287/343
Competing interests: No competing interests
Re: The management of chronic breathlessness in patients with advanced and terminal illness. MEDICINE, MEDITATION ,YOGA
The Editor ,
British Medical Journal
Dear Sir/Ma'am
It is really surprising to see that only a few articles have come in the scientific arena when we search meditation, yoga and breathlessness. But, highly encouraging, is to find that exercise programs and adaptive lifestyle changes have and an impact on life in a positive way. However, further randomised trials are needed so that the same can be included in guidelines in the near future. Small to large dyspnea improvements resulting from yoga have been seen in the study of Anna Norweg(1) et al.
The study of Lorenc AB, (2) et al studied meditative movement for respiratory function: a systematic review revealed that the available evidence does not support meditative movement for patients with CF, and there is very limited evidence for respiratory function in healthy populations. BUT another study on Yoga3, with an emphasis on postures coordinated with breathing and meditation practices, offers a potentially feasible and beneficial option that requires further study in the study population. These studies and their conclusions clearly show that this potential field deserves further scientific thinking and prospective study.
1. Anna Norweg Eileen G Collins Evidence for cognitive–behavioral strategies improving dyspnea and related distress in COPD. International Journal of COPD 2013:8:439–451
2. Lorenc AB, Wang Y, Madge SL, Hu X, Mian AM, Robinson N .Meditative movement for respiratory function: a systematic review. Respir Care. 2014 Mar;59(3):427-40.
3. M Fouladbakhsh J, Davis JE, Yarandi HN.. Using a standardized Viniyoga protocol for lung cancer survivors: a pilot study examining effects on breathing ease. J Complement Integr Med. 2013 Jun 26;10.
Competing interests: No competing interests