Research Methods & Reporting
IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 3: randomised controlled trials in the assessment stage and evaluations in the long term study stage
BMJ 2013; 346 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f2820 (Published 18 June 2013) Cite this as: BMJ 2013;346:f2820
Related articles
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 18 June 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f3012
- Research Methods & Reporting Published: 18 June 2013; BMJ 346 doi:10.1136/bmj.f3011
- Research Published: 11 October 2012; BMJ 345 doi:10.1136/bmj.e6457
- Education And Debate Published: 06 January 2005; BMJ 330 doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7482.88
- Education And Debate Published: 15 June 2002; BMJ 324 doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1448
- Paper Published: 26 May 2005; BMJ 330 doi:10.1136/bmj.38441.620417.8F
- PAPERS Published: 23 May 2005; BMJ doi:10.1136/bmj.38441.620417.8F
- Research Published: 09 September 2014; BMJ 349 doi:10.1136/bmj.g5133
- Editorial Published: 01 April 2015; BMJ 350 doi:10.1136/bmj.h1664
- Research Published: 02 June 2015; BMJ 350 doi:10.1136/bmj.h2685
- Research Published: 13 October 2015; BMJ 351 doi:10.1136/bmj.h5162
- Analysis Published: 09 June 2016; BMJ 353 doi:10.1136/bmj.i2372
See more
- Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer in individuals with previous colorectal neoplasia: systematic review and network meta-analysisBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6188; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6188
- NHS to fund large trial of pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV preventionBMJ December 05, 2016, 355 i6537; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6537
- Bill to boost medical research funding and speed drug approval passes US houseBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6498; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6498
- Alpha blockers for treatment of ureteric stones: systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ December 01, 2016, 355 i6112; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6112
- Sixty seconds on . . . solanezumabBMJ November 29, 2016, 355 i6389; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i6389
Cited by...
- Examining the application of the IDEAL framework in the reporting and evaluation of innovative invasive procedures: secondary qualitative analysis of a systematic review
- 'DISSEMINATE: a roadmap for facilitating adoption of affordable surgical innovations in low and middle-income countries
- Postoperative complications in glaucoma surgery: literature review-based recommendations to improve reporting consistency
- Development of a surgical competency assessment tool for sentinel lymph node dissection by minimally invasive surgery for endometrial cancer
- Development of reporting guidance and core outcome sets for seamless, standardised evaluation of innovative surgical procedures and devices: a study protocol for content generation and a Delphi consensus process (COHESIVE study)
- Adoption of a novel surgical innovation into clinical practice: protocol for a qualitative systematic review examining surgeon views
- Plans to accelerate innovation in health systems are less than IDEAL
- IDEAL-D: a rational framework for evaluating and regulating the use of medical devices
- Surrogate markers of long-term outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review
- Safety and efficacy of hysteroscopic sterilization compared with laparoscopic sterilization: an observational cohort study
- Use and risks of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse surgery in women in New York state: population based cohort study
- Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis
- Appraisal of evidence base for introduction of new implants in hip and knee replacement: a systematic review of five widely used device technologies
- Poor adherence of randomised trials in surgery to CONSORT guidelines for non-pharmacological treatments (NPT): a cross-sectional study
- IDEAL framework for surgical innovation 2: observational studies in the exploration and assessment stages