Rapid responses are electronic comments to the editor. They enable our users
to debate issues raised in articles published on bmj.com. A rapid response
is first posted online. If you need the URL (web address) of an individual
response, simply click on the response headline and copy the URL from the
browser window. A proportion of responses will, after editing, be published
online and in the print journal as letters, which are indexed in PubMed.
Rapid responses are not indexed in PubMed and they are not journal articles.
The BMJ reserves the right to remove responses which are being
wilfully misrepresented as published articles or when it is brought to our
attention that a response spreads misinformation.
From March 2022, the word limit for rapid responses will be 600 words not
including references and author details. We will no longer post responses
that exceed this limit.
The word limit for letters selected from posted responses remains 300 words.
I read with interest the letter by Dr Denis Remedios, Consultant Radiologist. It is reassuring to learn that the UK minimises the exposure of radiation to its patients with greater success than many of its European counterparts. However, we must also consider that guidelines by organisation such as the Royal College of Radiologists can only be followed if hospital resources are sufficient. Ultrasound lists are often overloaded in hospitals, causing clinicians to jump to CT for a quicker and more detailed answer to their questions, such as whether appendicitis is present. This scenario can lead to increased burden of radiation dose to patients. Therefore, it is the duty of hospitals to increase resource allocation to services in high demand, to ensure clinical decision making protects patients, and only supports the use of radiation when the benefits outweigh the risks.
Competing interests:
No competing interests
15 December 2013
Simon A Zakeri
Foundation Year 1 Doctor
Whittington Hospital
The Whittington Hospital NHS Trust, Magdala Avenue, London, N19 5NF
Re: Making the best use of clinical radiology
I read with interest the letter by Dr Denis Remedios, Consultant Radiologist. It is reassuring to learn that the UK minimises the exposure of radiation to its patients with greater success than many of its European counterparts. However, we must also consider that guidelines by organisation such as the Royal College of Radiologists can only be followed if hospital resources are sufficient. Ultrasound lists are often overloaded in hospitals, causing clinicians to jump to CT for a quicker and more detailed answer to their questions, such as whether appendicitis is present. This scenario can lead to increased burden of radiation dose to patients. Therefore, it is the duty of hospitals to increase resource allocation to services in high demand, to ensure clinical decision making protects patients, and only supports the use of radiation when the benefits outweigh the risks.
Competing interests: No competing interests