Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. News & Views
  2. Incorporating...
  3. Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations
Analysis Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations

Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations

BMJ 2008; 336 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39504.506319.80 (Published 22 May 2008) Cite this as: BMJ 2008;336:1170

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • What is the quality of evidence informing vaccine clinical practice recommendations in Australia?
  • British Thoracic Society guideline for diagnosing and monitoring paediatric sleep-disordered breathing
  • Evidence-to-decision frameworks: a review and analysis to inform decision-making for environmental health interventions
  • EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2019 update
  • Canadian clinical practice guidelines for the use of plant-based cannabis and cannabinoid-based products in the management of chronic non-cancer pain and co-occurring conditions: protocol for a systematic literature review
  • Canadian Rheumatology Association Recommendations for the Assessment and Monitoring of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
  • New era for European Respiratory Society clinical practice guidelines: joining efficiency and high methodological standards
  • EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update
  • Screening for coronary artery disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis
  • The changing landscape of biosimilars in rheumatology
  • European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update
  • Diagnosis and management of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: clinical practice guideline
  • Introduction to the GRADE Approach for Guideline Development: Considerations for Physical Therapist Practice
  • Management of Bell palsy: clinical practice guideline
  • Suggestions for improving guideline utility and trustworthiness
  • Evaluating the feasibility of complex interventions in mental health services: standardised measure and reporting guidelines
  • EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update
  • Guidelines 2.0: systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise
  • Levels, Grades, and Strength of Evidence: "Whats It All About, Alfie?"
  • Science and Evidence: Separating Fact from Fiction
  • Uncertainties in baseline risk estimates and confidence in treatment effects
  • Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care: We're back!
  • Le Groupe d'etude canadien sur les soins de sante preventifs: Nous sommes de retour!
  • The GRADE approach and Bradford Hill's criteria for causation
  • Sharing hard labour: developing a standard template for data summaries in guideline development
  • CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINES FOR PERITONEAL ACCESS
  • Economic aspects of treatment options in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review informing the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis
  • Importance of Evidence Grading for Guideline Implementation: The Example of Asthma
  • What should clinicians do when faced with conflicting recommendations?
  • Critical appraisal of cost-effectiveness and cost-utility studies in health care
  • Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive
Back to top