Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Process evaluation in...
  2. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions
Analysis And Comment Health services research

Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions

BMJ 2006; 332 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7538.413 (Published 16 February 2006) Cite this as: BMJ 2006;332:413

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • Assessing fidelity of motivational interviewing-based 'treatment support delivered by rheumatology practitioners within the TITRATE trial
  • Open-label placebo for non-specific pain in the emergency department (OLP EM): study protocol for a mixed-method randomised control feasibility study in Switzerland
  • Protocol for the process evaluation for a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating primary school-based screening and intervention delivery for childhood anxiety problems
  • Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for patients with atrial fibrillation receiving catheter ablation: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) with embedded process evaluation
  • Process Evaluation of Teaching Critical Thinking About Health Using the Informed Health Choices Intervention in Rwanda: A Mixed Methods Study
  • Active case finding using mobile vans equipped with artificial intelligence aided radiology tests and sputum collection for rapid diagnostic tests to reduce tuberculosis prevalence in rural China: protocol for a pragmatic trial
  • A mixed methods process evaluation of a peer coaching intervention to improve the implementation of preventive tasks by occupational physicians
  • Navigating process evaluation in co-creation: a Health CASCADE scoping review of used frameworks and assessed components
  • Health Catch-UP!: a realist evaluation of an innovative multi-disease screening and vaccination tool in UK primary care for at-risk migrant patients
  • A realist approach to implementation fidelity in a mixed-method evaluation of electronic decision support systems to improve the quality of antenatal care in Nepal
  • Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a web-based cardiac rehabilitation programme for people with chronic stable angina: protocol for the ACTIVATE (Angina Controlled Trial Investigating the Value of the ''Activate your heart Therapeutic E-intervention) randomised controlled trial
  • Determinants of practice for providing decision coaching to facilitate informed values-based decision-making: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review
  • BabyBreathe trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention to prevent postpartum return to smoking
  • Implementation of dementia care management in routine care (RoutineDeCM): a study protocol for process evaluation
  • Protocol for a process evaluation of a stepped wedge randomised controlled trial to reduce unnecessary hospitalisations of older people from residential aged care: the EDDIE+ study
  • Complex multidisciplinary intervention to improve Initial Medication Adherence to cardiovascular disease and diabetes treatments in primary care (the IMA-cRCT study): mixed-methods process evaluation protocol
  • Key learnings from an outcome and embedded process evaluation of a direct to beneficiary mobile health intervention among marginalised women in rural Bihar, India
  • Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis
  • Process evaluation protocol of a cluster randomised trial for a scalable solution for delivery of Diabetes Self-Management Education in Thailand (DSME-T)
  • The heart & mind trial: intervention with cognitive-behavioural therapy in patients with cardiac disease and anxiety: randomised controlled trial protocol
  • Health providers experiences with mental health specialist video consultations in primary care: a qualitative study nested within a randomised feasibility trial
  • Study protocol for a prospective process evaluation of a culturally secure rehabilitation programme for Aboriginal Australians after brain injury: the Healing Right Way project
  • Mixed methods evaluation of a self-management group programme for patients with neuromuscular disease and chronic fatigue
  • Lay perspectives of the open-label placebo rationale: a qualitative study of participants in an experimental trial
  • Implementation of a complex intervention to improve hospital discharge: process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial
  • Fidelity of primary care nurses delivery of a behavioural change intervention enhancing physical activity in patients at risk of cardiovascular disease: an observational study
  • Clinical and cost-effectiveness of an online-delivered group-based pain management programme in improving pain-related disability for people with persistent pain--protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (iSelf-help trial)
  • Protocol for the process evaluation of a complex intervention delivered in schools to prevent adolescent depression: the Future Proofing Study
  • Qualitative Research in Rheumatology: An Overview of Methods and Contributions to Practice and Policy
  • Study protocol for evaluation of aid to diagnosis for developmental dysplasia of the hip in general practice: controlled trial randomised by practice
  • Protocol for a mixed methods process evaluation of the Smoking Treatment Optimisation in Pharmacies (STOP) trial
  • Implementation, mechanisms of impact and key contextual factors involved in outcomes of the Modification of Diet, Exercise and Lifestyle (MODEL) randomised controlled trial in Australian adults: protocol for a mixed-method process evaluation
  • Protocol for a definitive randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of a community-based rehabilitation programme following hip fracture: fracture in the elderly multidisciplinary rehabilitation--phase III (FEMuR III)
  • Information sharing challenges in end-of-life care: a qualitative study of patient, family and professional perspectives on the potential of an Electronic Palliative Care Co-ordination System
  • Applying thematic synthesis to interpretation and commentary in epidemiological studies: identifying what contributes to successful interventions to promote hand hygiene in patient care
  • Improving Primary Care After Stroke (IPCAS) randomised controlled trial: protocol for a multidimensional process evaluation
  • C-reactive protein-guided antibiotic prescribing for COPD exacerbations: a qualitative evaluation
  • Clinical Decision Support Systems for Opioid Prescribing for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain in Primary Care: A Scoping Review
  • Understanding implementation success: protocol for an in-depth, mixed-methods process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial testing methods to improve detection of Lynch syndrome in Australian hospitals
  • Behavioural and pharmaceutical interventions for the prevention of skin cancers in solid organ transplant recipients: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials
  • Can a teacher-led mindfulness intervention for new school entrants improve child outcomes? Protocol for a school cluster randomised controlled trial
  • Evaluation of a complex integrated, cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care program (isPO): a mixed-methods study protocol
  • Informed Health Choices media intervention for improving peoples ability to critically appraise the trustworthiness of claims about treatment effects: a mixed-methods process evaluation of a randomised trial in Uganda
  • What predicts regression from pre-diabetes to normal glucose regulation following a primary care nurse-delivered dietary intervention? A study protocol for a prospective cohort study
  • Fidelity is fundamental: intervention predictors in advance care plans in terminal cancer
  • Improving continuity of patient care across sectors: study protocol of the process evaluation of a quasi-experimental multi-centre study regarding an admission and discharge model in Germany (VESPEERA)
  • Can implementation failure or intervention failure explain the result of the 3D multimorbidity trial in general practice: mixed-methods process evaluation
  • The Children and Young Peoples Health Partnership Evelina London Model of Care: process evaluation protocol
  • Process evaluation of team-based care in people aged >65 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Effectiveness of a tailored rehabilitation versus standard strengthening programme for patients with shoulder pain: a protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial (the Otago MASTER trial)
  • Healthcare practitioners experiences of an intervention to detect and treat patients with liver disease (the LOCATE intervention): a qualitative process evaluation
  • Process evaluation protocol for a cluster randomised trial of a complex, nurse-led intervention to improve hypertension management in India
  • Process evaluation of complex interventions tested in randomised controlled trials in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review protocol
  • Feasibility of delivering integrated COPD-asthma care at primary and secondary level public healthcare facilities in Pakistan: a process evaluation
  • Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness randomised controlled trial of basic versus biofeedback-mediated intensive pelvic floor muscle training for female stress or mixed urinary incontinence: protocol for the OPAL (optimising pelvic floor exercises to achieve long-term benefits) trial mixed methods longitudinal qualitative case study and process evaluation
  • Process evaluation and the development of behavioural interventions to improve psychological distress among survivors of critical illness
  • Mixed methods process evaluation of an enhanced community-based rehabilitation intervention for elderly patients with hip fracture
  • Testing of a synthetic phonics-based targeted reading intervention for students with reading difficulties in Year 1: protocol for an efficacy randomised controlled trial
  • Improving cardiometabolic and mental health in women with gestational diabetes mellitus and their offspring: study protocol for MySweetHeart Trial, a randomised controlled trial
  • TEXT messages to improve MEDication adherence and Secondary prevention (TEXTMEDS) after acute coronary syndrome: a randomised clinical trial protocol
  • Health system effects of implementing integrated community case management (iCCM) intervention in private retail drug shops in South Western Uganda: a qualitative study
  • Using mixed methods to assess fidelity of delivery and its influencing factors in a complex self-management intervention for people with osteoarthritis and low back pain
  • Is job rotation effective for prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders and sick leave?
  • Exploring how ward staff engage with the implementation of a patient safety intervention: a UK-based qualitative process evaluation
  • Peripherally InSerted CEntral catheter dressing and securement in patients with cancer: the PISCES trial. Protocol for a 2x2 factorial, superiority randomised controlled trial
  • Supportive Care: Economic Considerations in Advanced Kidney Disease
  • Changing the environment to improve population health: a framework for considering exposure in natural experimental studies
  • How can we help family carers manage pain medicines for patients with advanced cancer? A systematic review of intervention studies
  • Protocol for a process evaluation of a cluster randomised controlled trial to improve management of multimorbidity in general practice: the 3D study
  • Cluster randomised controlled trial of a financial incentive for mothers to improve breast feeding in areas with low breastfeeding rates: the NOSH study protocol
  • RESPOND: a patient-centred programme to prevent secondary falls in older people presenting to the emergency department with a fall--protocol for a mixed methods programme evaluation
  • Randomised controlled pilot study to assess the feasibility of a Mediterranean Portfolio dietary intervention for cardiovascular risk reduction in HIV dyslipidaemia: a study protocol
  • Lessons learnt from the Bristol Girls Dance Project cluster RCT: implications for designing and implementing after-school physical activity interventions
  • The Health and Sport Engagement (HASE) Intervention and Evaluation Project: protocol for the design, outcome, process and economic evaluation of a complex community sport intervention to increase levels of physical activity
  • Study protocol for a controlled trial of Strengths Model Case Management in mental health services in Hong Kong
  • Process evaluation of the impact and acceptability of a polypill for prevention of cardiovascular disease
  • The CORE study protocol: a stepped wedge cluster randomised controlled trial to test a co-design technique to optimise psychosocial recovery outcomes for people affected by mental illness in the community mental health setting
  • Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance
  • Prescriptive scientific narratives for communicating usable science
  • GPs experiences with brief intervention for medication-overuse headache: a qualitative study in general practice
  • Family-based interventions to increase physical activity in children: a meta-analysis and realist synthesis protocol
  • Measures of exposure to the Well London Phase-1 intervention and their association with health well-being and social outcomes
  • Introducing structured caregiver training in stroke care: findings from the TRACS process evaluation study
  • A randomised controlled trial of a consumer-focused e-health strategy for cardiovascular risk management in primary care: the Consumer Navigation of Electronic Cardiovascular Tools (CONNECT) study protocol
  • What can qualitative research do for randomised controlled trials? A systematic mapping review
  • INterpreting the Processes of the UMPIRE Trial (INPUT): protocol for a qualitative process evaluation study of a fixed-dose combination (FDC) strategy to improve adherence to cardiovascular medications
  • Process evaluation of a tailored multifaceted feedback program to improve the quality of intensive care by using quality indicators
Back to top