Intended for healthcare professionals

Papers

Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: three part evaluation

BMJ 2001; 322 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7301.1516 (Published 23 June 2001) Cite this as: BMJ 2001;322:1516
  1. Rachelle Buchbinder (rachelle.buchbinder{at}med.monash.edu.au), associate professor and directora,
  2. Damien Jolley, associate professor in epidemiology and biostatisticsb,
  3. Mary Wyatt, honorary lecturerc
  1. a Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Cabrini Hospital and Monash University Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Cabrini Medical Centre, Malvern, Victoria, Australia 3144
  2. b School of Health Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia 3125
  3. c Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3004
  1. Correspondence to: R Buchbinder
  • Accepted 6 April 2001

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of a population based, state-wide public health intervention designed to alter beliefs about back pain, influence medical management, and reduce disability and costs of compensation.

Design: Quasi-experimental, non-randomised, non-equivalent, before and after telephone surveys of the general population and postal surveys of general practitioners with an adjacent state as control group and descriptive analysis of claims database.

Setting: Two states in Australia.

Participants: 4730 members of general population before and two and two and a half years after campaign started, in a ratio of 2:1:1; 2556 general practitioners before and two years after campaign onset.

Main outcome measures: Back beliefs questionnaire, knowledge and attitude statements about back pain, incidence of workers' financial compensation claims for back problems, rate of days compensated, and medical payments for claims related to back pain and other claims.

Results: In the intervention state beliefs about back pain became more positive between successive surveys (mean improvement in questionnaire score 1.9 (95% confidence interval 1.3 to 2.5), P<0.001 and 3.2 (2.6 to 3.9), P<0.001, between baseline and the second and third survey, respectively). Beliefs about back pain also improved among doctors. There was a clear decline in number of claims for back pain, rates of days compensated, and medical payments for claims for back pain over the duration of the campaign.

Conclusions: A population based strategy of provision of positive messages about back pain improves population and general practitioner beliefs about back pain and seems to influence medical management and reduce disability and workers' compensation costs related to back pain.

What is already known on this topic

What is already known on this topic The number of people with disability from back pain has risen rapidly in the past 50 years

Most attempts to limit this disability include modification of occupational risk factors or dealing with the problem once it has developed

Patients' attitudes and beliefs play an important part in the development of such chronic disability

What this study adds

What this study adds A population based primary prevention intervention that provided explicit advice about back pain improved beliefs about back pain in the general population and knowledge and attitudes in general practitioners

The number of workers' compensation claims for back pain decreased and the rate of days compensated and medical payments for back claims were reduced

Footnotes

  • Funding Victoria WorkCover Authority.

  • Competing interests None declared.

View Full Text