Intended for healthcare professionals

  1. Research
  2. Publication bias:...
  3. Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects
Papers

Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projects

BMJ 1997; 315 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.640 (Published 13 September 1997) Cite this as: BMJ 1997;315:640

Related articles

See more

Cited by...

  • SEETrials: Leveraging Large Language Models for Safety and Efficacy Extraction in Oncology Clinical Trials
  • Captured by design: the drug industry and UK healthcare
  • Evidence of publication bias in multiple sclerosis clinical trials: a comparative analysis of published and unpublished studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov
  • Evaluating prospective study registration and result reporting of trials conducted in Canada from 2009-2019
  • Predictors of Success of Phase II Pediatric Oncology Clinical Trials
  • Assessing Confidence in the Results of Network Meta-Analysis (Cinema)
  • Clinical trial design and dissemination: comprehensive analysis of clinicaltrials.gov and PubMed data since 2005
  • Association between statistical significance and time to publication among systematic reviews: a study protocol for a meta-epidemiological investigation
  • Comparison of veterinary drugs and veterinary homeopathy: part 2
  • Discontinuation and non-publication of randomised clinical trials supported by the main public funding body in Switzerland: a retrospective cohort study
  • Assessment of the extent of unpublished studies in prognostic factor research: a systematic review of p53 immunohistochemistry in bladder cancer as an example
  • Using prediction markets to estimate the reproducibility of scientific research
  • Occurrence and determinants of selective reporting of clinical drug trials: design of an inception cohort study
  • Selective clinical trial reporting: betraying trial participants, harming patients
  • Industry sponsorship bias in research findings: a network meta-analysis of LDL cholesterol reduction in randomised trials of statins
  • Non-publication and delayed publication of randomized trials on vaccines: survey
  • Publication rate for funded studies from a major UK health research funder: a cohort study
  • Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with measurement scale outcomes: a systematic review of trials with both blinded and nonblinded assessors
  • Burden of Diabetes on the Ability to Work: A systematic review
  • Observer bias in randomised clinical trials with binary outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors
  • Impact of single centre status on estimates of intervention effects in trials with continuous outcomes: meta-epidemiological study
  • Compliance with mandatory reporting of clinical trial results on ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional study
  • Publication of NIH funded trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov: cross sectional analysis
  • Reboxetine for acute treatment of major depression: systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished placebo and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor controlled trials
  • Europe's opportunity to open up drug regulation
  • New methods to deal with publication bias
  • A comparison of fluoroquinolones versus other antibiotics for treating enteric fever: meta-analysis
  • Commentary: Practicing on the Tip of an Information Iceberg? Evidence of Underpublication of Registered Clinical Trials in Oncology
  • Clinical research projects at a German medical faculty: follow-up from ethical approval to publication and citation by others
  • Interpreting Results of Clinical Trials: A Conceptual Framework
  • Evaluating solutions to sponsorship bias
  • Status of healthcare studies submitted to UK research ethics committees for approval in 2004-5
  • Analysis of Phase II Studies on Targeted Agents and Subsequent Phase III Trials: What Are the Predictors for Success?
  • Improving the Quality of Abstract Reporting for Phase I Cancer Trials
  • Putting evidence into context: some advice for guideline writers
  • Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: When One Study Is Just not Enough
  • Systematic Literature Review of Oral Hygiene Practices for Intensive Care Patients Receiving Mechanical Ventilation
  • Putting evidence into context: some advice for guideline writers
  • Commercially Funded and United States-Based Research Is More Likely to Be Published; Good-Quality Studies with Negative Outcomes Are Not
  • The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey
  • Oral presentation bias: a retrospective cohort study
  • Clinical trial registration at Tobacco Control
  • Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review
  • Evidence of publication bias in reporting acute stroke clinical trials.
  • Critical appraisal and positive outcome bias in case reports published in brazilian dental journals.
  • Fate of biomedical research protocols and publication bias in France: retrospective cohort study
  • Randomised controlled trials relevant to aggressive and violent people, 1955-2000: a survey
  • Challenges for Evidence-Based Physical Therapy: Accessing and Interpreting High-Quality Evidence on Therapy
  • Quality of Abstracts Describing Randomized Trials in the Proceedings of American Society of Clinical Oncology Meetings: Guidelines for Improved Reporting
  • Randomized clinical trials: What gets published, and when?
  • Evidence b(i)ased medicine--selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: review of studies in new drug applications
  • Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review
  • Getting it right: industry sponsorship and medical research
  • Weather, Chinook, and Stroke Occurrence * Editorial Comment
  • Identifying the research question and planning the project
  • Potential solutions to the problem of conducting systematic reviews of new health technologies
  • Overview of Evidence-based Medicine: Challenges for Evidence-based Laboratory Medicine
  • Systematic reviews in health care: Investigating and dealing with publication and other biases in meta-analysis
  • Why we need a broad perspective on meta-analysis
  • Publication Bias Is a Scientific Problem with Adverse Ethical Outcomes: The Case for a Section for Null Results
  • Evidence based medicine overviews, bulletins, guidelines, and the new consensus
  • Lessons from linomide: A failed trial, but not a failure
  • Content and Quality of Currently Published Phase II Cancer Trials
  • Registering clinical trials
  • Is Helicobacter pylori associated with non-ulcer dyspepsia and will eradication improve symptoms? A meta-analysis
  • Having non-medical readers of papers on internet will enhance peer review
  • The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials
  • Being a modern pharmaceutical company
  • Should inhaled anticholinergics be added to beta 2 agonists for treating acute childhood and adolescent asthma? A systematic review
  • Cleaning the umbilical cord with water rather than alcohol shortened the time to separation with no change in colonisation
  • Review: topical agents for cord care have not been shown to be effective in newborn infants in developed countries
  • Searching for the best evidence. Part 1: where to look
  • Meta-analysis of short term low dose prednisolone versus placebo and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in rheumatoid arthritis
  • Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical
  • Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research
  • meta-analysis bias in location and selection of studies
  • Meta-analysis and the meta-epidemiology of clinical research
Back to top