Letters
Quality of randomised controlled trials
BMJ 2004; 328 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7434.286-a (Published 29 January 2004) Cite this as: BMJ 2004;328:286
Quality of trial methods is not good in all disciplines
- Helen H G Handoll, senior lecturer (h.handoll@ed.ac.uk)
- School of Health and Social Care, University of Teesside, Middlesbrough TS1 3BA
EDITOR—The paper by Soares et al is a useful reminder of the important distinction between quality of trial reporting and quality of trial methods.1
An established, motivated, and informed group such as the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group is likely not only to have well designed trials but to conduct them according to …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.