Letters
Unit of analysis errors should be clarified in meta-analyses
BMJ 2003; 326 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7385.397 (Published 15 February 2003) Cite this as: BMJ 2003;326:397
- Ruth E Thomas (r.e.thomas@abdn.ac.uk), research fellow,
- Craig R Ramsay, senior statistician,
- Laura McAuley, review group coordinator,
- Jeremy M Grimshaw, director, clinical epidemiology programme
- Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD
- Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group, Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, 1 Stewart Street, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1N 6N5
- Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa Health Research Institute, 1053 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1Y 4E9
EDITOR—Weingarten et al present a comprehensive study in what is a complex area of research.1 We were, however, unclear whether any of the included primary studies had unit of analysis errors and how the authors dealt with such studies in their meta-analysis.
Unit of analysis errors occur in cluster randomised trials when individual patients' data …
Log in
Log in using your username and password
Log in through your institution
Subscribe from £184 *
Subscribe and get access to all BMJ articles, and much more.
* For online subscription
Access this article for 1 day for:
£50 / $60/ €56 (excludes VAT)
You can download a PDF version for your personal record.