NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 331 to 345 of 2,338 results Save | Export
Hind, Robert E.; And Others – 1972
This paper reports on an investigation of the evaluation of teaching and research at Stanford University in the School of Humanities and Sciences. It was found that professional colleagues had far more influence on organizational rewards and penalties than did administrative superiors. Evaluations of research had far more influence than did…
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Performance Criteria
Case, Chester H. – 1971
The key to tenure is evaluation; this paper is the result of dissatisfaction with the basic pattern of evaluation that prevails throughout California. The present Quality Control Model of Faculty Development is widespread, deeply entrenched, and grounded on assumptions and premises that are limited, obsolete, and contrary to the interests of…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation
Kulik, James A.; Ericksen, Stanford C. – 1974
Departments, schools, and colleges within the University of Michigan differ widely in the procedures used to evaluate members of their faculties. In some instances student rating forms are used but practices differ as to the kind of information obtained and the weight given to these assessments. Each set of procedures is designed to serve local…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Pettman, Philip J.
This annotated bibliography on student evaluation of faculty contains articles published between 1965 and 1970. The 107 articles are divided into the following categories: surveys; factor analytic surveys (usually authors of these studies address themselves to different questions than do authors of non-factor analytic surveys); experiments (in…
Descriptors: Annotated Bibliographies, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Aleamoni, Lawrence M. – 1973
Of the various systems developed for student evaluation of course and instructor, the Illinois Course Evaluation Questionnaire (CEQ) has perhaps the most extensive reliability and validity data to support it as well as the most extensive norm data base. The CEQ is used to collect student attitudes towards a course and instructor and its purpose is…
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Tolle, Donald J. – 1970
This is a review of the literature surrounding the development of techniques for, and changes in professional attitudes toward, the evaluation of community college faculty in their instructional role. Discussion focuses on the purpose, criteria, and process of evaluation. In discussing the purposes of evaluation, the author deals with teacher…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Wotring, C. Jarvis – 1972
The main purposes of this pilot study were to obtain school principals' evaluations of recent Central Michigan University graduates and to determine how the graduates felt about their preparation and the professors who had taught them. Seventy-nine principals evaluated 252 teachers in urban, suburban, and rural schools in lower Michigan. The…
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation, Teacher Education, Teacher Effectiveness
Heyn, David R. – 1972
Professors and courses at Austin College were evaluated sociometrically by almost 90% of all full-time resident students. The 3 professors and courses they would recommend most as well as least to other students were listed. A 30% random sample of respondents was then interviewed by other students. Both the sociometric results and the results of…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Course Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Houston Univ., TX. Coll. of Education. – 1972
This document is divided into three sections: a rationale and plan for faculty evaluation, professional data outline, and criterion for faculty evaluation. The first section develops a rationale for evaluation and indicates three levels of assessing performance: proficiency, competence and incompetence. The professional data outline indicates…
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Performance Criteria
Daniel, Norman E.; Jones, J. Richard – Southern Journal of Educational Research, 1978
Academicians, although they would prefer otherwise, perceive university reward systems to have a bias favoring academic journals. Additionally, they doubt whether administrators have good insight concerning the readership of either academic or trade journals. They do not believe administrators are concerned about the numbers of individuals exposed…
Descriptors: Communication (Thought Transfer), Faculty Evaluation, Information Utilization, Professional Recognition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tong, Hsin-Min; Bures, Allen L. – Journal of Education for Business, 1987
A survey of 265 business faculty members sought information about the faculty evaluation systems in use at their institutions, measured respondents' attitude toward the system, and collected basic information about the institution. Results indicate a strong correlation between type of evaluation system and faculty satisfaction or dissatisfaction.…
Descriptors: Business Administration Education, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Postsecondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Campbell, R. Lynn – Interchange, 1986
This paper deals with tenure and promotion in Canadian colleges and universities focusing on the history of judicial/arbitral review of college decision-making, confidentiality versus fairness, and the function of tenure and promotion in postsecondary institutions. (MT)
Descriptors: Confidentiality, Court Role, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kaun, David E. – Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1984
Examines the rates of faculty advancement during the formative years of the University of California at Santa Cruz. Found a significant relationship between faculty advancement and quality teaching, in addition to the usual relationship with length of service and publications. (JOW)
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education, Nontraditional Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Israel, Everett N. – The Technology Teacher, 1984
Offers a definition of scholarship and service that might be used by an industrial education department chairperson and/or faculty to evaluate productivity and identifies acceptable products for each criterion. (JOW)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Industrial Education
Champion, Lynn J.; Champion, Dean J. – Southern Journal of Educational Research, 1973
The present research is a comparison of faculty from a large university with faculty from a small college in a rather homogeneous Southeastern region of the United States. (Author)
Descriptors: Colleges, Data Analysis, Educational Research, Faculty Evaluation
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  19  |  20  |  21  |  22  |  23  |  24  |  25  |  26  |  27  |  ...  |  156