Publication Date
| In 2025 | 4 |
| Since 2024 | 20 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 55 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 96 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 240 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 247 |
| Postsecondary Education | 166 |
| Two Year Colleges | 10 |
| Adult Education | 5 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
| Secondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| High Schools | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 312 |
| Administrators | 162 |
| Teachers | 120 |
| Policymakers | 40 |
| Researchers | 29 |
| Students | 7 |
| Media Staff | 2 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| Australia | 33 |
| Canada | 30 |
| United Kingdom | 28 |
| California | 19 |
| China | 14 |
| United States | 14 |
| United Kingdom (Great Britain) | 12 |
| United Kingdom (England) | 11 |
| Pennsylvania | 9 |
| New York | 8 |
| Texas | 7 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Students Evaluation of… | 4 |
| Flanders System of… | 1 |
| Flesch Reading Ease Formula | 1 |
| Myers Briggs Type Indicator | 1 |
| National Survey of Student… | 1 |
| Teacher Performance… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHall, George L. – NASSP Bulletin, 1974
Discusses staff evaluation in terms of how much can be expected of a teacher according to his experience. (Editor)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation, Teacher Effectiveness, Teacher Evaluation
Williams, Richard C. – Junior Coll J, 1969
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Teacher Qualifications, Tenure
Sale, J. Kirk – Change High Educ, 1969
Descriptors: Adult Education, College Programs, Colleges, Faculty Evaluation
Download full textRobinson, Lora H. – 1970
This issue of CURRENTS focuses on the selection and evaluation/retention of college faculty as 2 means of improving college teaching. The review of selected literature on hiring and evaluation practices includes summaries of successful and proposed criteria for measuring faculty performance and barriers to their use. Twenty-two sources document…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Recruitment, Higher Education
Peer reviewedBresler, Jack B. – Science, 1968
Because many recent articles on higher education have depicted the faculty member who publishes and works to obtain government support for his research as a poor instructor, it was decided to investigate the relationships between publication, success in obtaining government awards, and teaching effectiveness. Three groups of data were used. One…
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Publications, Research
Nelson, Jonathan E. – Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 1978
This model is intended as a guideline for facilitating more objective and valid faculty promotion decisions in physical education departments. (MM)
Descriptors: Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Promotion, Higher Education
Peer reviewedYowell, Bob – ACA Bulletin, 1985
Considers the similarities between teaching and directing and offers suggestions for evaluating play directors. (PD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewedCooke, Thomas P. – ACA Bulletin, 1985
Discusses the difficulties inherent in evaluating the director's work since it combines teaching and artistic aspects. (PD)
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewedNorwood, Louanne; Worthy, Terry – Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 1986
A questionnaire was designed to discover and describe the criteria and methods used in promoting and retaining dance faculty at colleges offering both graduate and undergraduate degrees in dance. Responses are discussed. (MT)
Descriptors: Dance Education, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Problems, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewedCoufal, James E.; Hines, Edward R. – Planning and Changing, 1976
If faculty do not advocate the adoption of a systematic, objective faculty evaluation system, they must stand accused of operating with a set of double standards. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Needs, Faculty Evaluation
Rosenshine, Barak; And Others – Journal of College Student Personnel, 1973
The purpose of this study was to analyze the data from a student evaluation survey of courses and instructors in order to determine whether certain demographic variables were related to the student ratings and which rating variables were related to certain preference criteria. (Author)
Descriptors: Course Evaluation, Demography, Evaluation, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewedFurniss, W. Todd – Educational Record, 1971
Descriptors: College Faculty, Faculty, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Mobility
Perry, Richard R. – Coll Univ Bus, 1969
Descriptors: Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation, Measurement Techniques, Teacher Behavior
Shears, Pat – Vocational Aspect of Education, 1982
Examines a range of possible approaches to the organization and implementation of staff development within colleges in order to abstract those criteria which might be considered essential ingredients of a successful approach. (Author)
Descriptors: Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedAroian, Jane; And Others – Nurse Educator, 1982
The process presented interrelates a positive, systematic plan for evaluation of nursing faculty with an individualized program of personal and professional development. This process makes use of self-, peer, student, and administrative input. (Editor/CT)
Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation, Individual Development
