Comparison of Thought-Listing Rating Methods.

Tarico, Valerie S.; And Others

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ335571

Record Type: CIJE

Publication Date: 1986

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: N/A

EISSN: N/A

Comparison of Thought-Listing Rating Methods.

Tarico, Valerie S.; And Others

Journal of Counseling Psychology, v33 n1 p81-83 Jan 1986

Compared three methods of rating thoughts: self-rating by subjects, rating by experts with thoughts presented randomly, and rating by experts with thoughts presented in context among 107 students who listed their thoughts prior to giving a speech. Results indicated all three methods were equal in predictions of speech anxiety and performance. (Author/ABB)

Descriptors: Anxiety, Cognitive Measurement, Cognitive Processes, Comparative Analysis, Interrater Reliability, Predictive Validity, Rating Scales, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Testing

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A