An Evaluation by a Panel of Psychologists of the Reliability and Validity of Two Tests of Critical Thinking.

Modjeski, Richard B.; Michael, William B.

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ296165

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1983

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: N/A

EISSN: N/A

An Evaluation by a Panel of Psychologists of the Reliability and Validity of Two Tests of Critical Thinking.

Modjeski, Richard B.; Michael, William B.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, v43 n4 p1187-97 Win 1983

Two tests of critical thinking (the Cornell Critical Thinking Test and the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal) were evaluated by a panel of psychologists relative to the validity, reliability, and error of measurement standards stated in the "Standards for Educational and Psychological Tests," 1974. (PN)

Descriptors: Cognitive Tests, Critical Thinking, Error of Measurement, Evaluation Criteria, Standards, Test Reliability, Test Validity, Testing Problems

Publication Type: Reports - Research; Journal Articles

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: Cornell Critical Thinking Test; Watson Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A