Comparing Three Methods of Practicing Reading to Reduce Errors in Oral Reading.

Cox, Ruth Matz; Shrigley, Robert L.

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ238504

Record Type: CIJE

Publication Date: 1980

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: N/A

EISSN: N/A

Comparing Three Methods of Practicing Reading to Reduce Errors in Oral Reading.

Cox, Ruth Matz; Shrigley, Robert L.

Reading Improvement, v17 n4 p306-10 Win 1980

Reports that reading in unison, reading silently, and reading orally to partners were all successful in reducing oral reading errors in primary school students, but that unison and silent reading were more effective at error reduction than was reading orally to partners. (FL)

Descriptors: Error Analysis (Language), Oral Reading, Primary Education, Reading Instruction, Reading Research, Teaching Methods

Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: English

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A