Quotas Are Not Reverse Discrimination.

McDonald, Gabrielle K.

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Back to results

ERIC Number: EJ150393

Record Type: Journal

Publication Date: 1975

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: N/A

EISSN: N/A

Quotas Are Not Reverse Discrimination

McDonald, Gabrielle K.

Texas Southern University Law Review, 3, 2, 77-84, Spr 75

The findings of the Morrow v. Crisler and NAACP v. Allen civil rights cases are discussed. It is concluded from these employment discrimination cases that quotas are not reverse discrimination because no one has the right to continue to receive the benefits of racial discrimination at the expense of others. (LBH)

Descriptors: Civil Rights Legislation, Constitutional Law, Educational Discrimination, Employment Opportunities, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Higher Education, Quotas, Racial Discrimination, Social Discrimination

Publication Type: N/A

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: N/A

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A