Urban-serving research universities (USRUs) address issues of access, community engagement, and development within urban areas, but internal and external forces complicate their place-based missions. By embracing contradictions within stakeholder viewpoints, strategic planning can foster fruitful, institutionalized engagement. This mixed-methods study analyzed responses to a core values survey that was disseminated to stakeholders at a USRU to explore the question "What do the ratings of and comments about the "community-minded" value reveal about possible tensions and opportunities in how stakeholders describe a USRU's fulfillment of its "community-minded" value?" Through stakeholder and paradox theory, we examined how stakeholder perspectives uncover tensions and opportunities related to the "community-minded" value. Whereas stakeholder theory emphasized the importance of valuing the interests of all stakeholders, paradox theory illustrated how coexisting-but-divergent perspectives on defining, approaching, and engaging community could help to advance community engagement goals.