Collaborative assessment techniques are needed to align with shifting approaches to learning that center peer interaction. Furthermore, it is critical to understand how collaborative assessments work for students belonging to historically marginalized groups. This study reports the perspectives of four mixed race and Latina/Hispanic women regarding peer interaction and group exams in university mathematics courses. Three primary themes emerged from interviews: (a) benefits of communication during group exams, (b) challenges of working with peers during group exams, and (c) consideration of gender balance when assigning exam groups. These findings have implications for how college instructors implement collaborative exams in intentional ways that benefit students.