Mayer and Trezek offer a rejoinder to an article by Scott, Dostal, and Lane-Outlaw in which Scott et al. challenge the findings and conclusions of a literature review by Mayer and Trezek published in the Winter 2020 "American Annals of the Deaf." Both the rejoinder and the article by Scott et al. appear in the "Annals'" Spring 2021 issue. Mayer and Trezek reiterate the rationale and aims of their review, as well as the process for conducting it, emphasizing the need for empirical evidence to inform policy and practice in deaf education. They also address observations made in terms of (a) factors to be considered when generating or consuming research and (b) the nature of the search procedures that are used. Mayer and Trezek conclude by restating the findings of their review and the implications of these findings for the field moving forward. [For the article by Scott, Dostal, and Lane-Outlaw, "A Call for a Diversity of Perspectives in Deaf Education Research: A Response to Mayer and Trezek (2020)," see EJ1296492. For the literature review by Mayer and Trezek, "English Literacy Outcomes in Sign Bilingual Programs: Current State of the Knowledge," see EJ1269623.]