NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1269605
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2020
Pages: 12
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-1947-380X
EISSN: N/A
Accuracy of Undergraduate Athletic Training Student Performance Factors for Determining Board of Certification Exam First-Time Pass Outcomes
Hobson, Zachary Ryan; Miller, Sayers John; Downs, Danielle Symons; Vairo, Giampietro Luciano
Athletic Training Education Journal, v15 n3 p212-223 Jul-Sep 2020
Context: There is a lack of current evidence to help athletic training programs identify students poised for first-time Board of Certification (BOC) exam success as a means to ensure compliance with contemporary accreditation standards. Various academic variables have been previously identified as predictors of first-time success; however, these investigations reflect prior versions of the credentialing examination based on what are now obsolete editions of the professional practice analysis. Objective: To determine the accuracy of undergraduate athletic training student performance factors as indicators of successfully passing the current version of the BOC exam on a first attempt. Design: Casual-comparative (ex-post facto) quasi-experimental. Setting: An accredited undergraduate athletic training program. Patients or Other Participants: A recent sample of athletic training program graduates (n = 43). Intervention(s): Archived data were collected from student academic records and analyzed. Main Outcome Measure(s): Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis computed the area under the curve (AUC), which was used to determine accuracy of variables. Optimal thresholds for passing the BOC exam on a first attempt were computed for each variable by the index of union method. Results: The AUC and associated thresholds for factors were as follows: cumulative grade point average (GPA) upon entry to the major (AUC = 0.67, threshold = 3.20); preprofessional-phase course GPA (AUC = 0.81, threshold = 3.48); averaged admission interview score (AUC = 0.49, threshold = 8.46); averaged preceptor evaluation of applicant score (AUC = 0.53, threshold = 93.88%); unique composite score (AUC = 0.80, threshold = 7.34); cumulative GPA upon graduation (AUC = 0.68, threshold = 3.19); combined math and reading SAT score (AUC = 0.90, threshold = 960); clinical education hours (AUC = 0.61, threshold = 1131.08). ConclusionsL Preprofessional-phase course GPA provided the greatest accuracy of the secondary admissions criteria; however, the combined math and reading SAT score provided the greatest accuracy of all examined variables. Furthermore, the unique composite score may represent an accurate, all-inclusive indicator of success. Program administrators and athletic training educators may use these outcomes to shape their related programmatic operations.
National Athletic Trainers' Association. 2952 Stemmons Freeway Suite 200, Dallas, TX 75247. Tel: 214-637-6282; Fax: 214-637-2206; e-mail: ATEdJournal@gmail.com; Web site: http://nataej.org/journal-information.htm
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: SAT (College Admission Test)
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A