NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1269601
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2020-Sep
Pages: 13
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: EISSN-0267-1611
EISSN: N/A
Making Meaning from Experience: Collaborative Assessment with Young Adults Who Have Mental Health Needs and Social Communication Differences
Kennedy, Emma-Kate; Blyth, Fiona; Sakata, Ellie; Yahyaoui, Leila; Canagaratnam, Myooran; Nijabat, Kiran
Educational & Child Psychology, v37 n3 p86-98 Sep 2020
Aims: As the number of people aged 16-25 referred to mental health services rises, the increasing complexity of their presenting needs is apparent. For those with additional communication and interaction differences, psychological assessment may be especially challenging. They often have long-standing histories of interpersonal challenge, do not find making relationships with others easy and can find conventional information-gathering assessments difficult and at times, even unhelpful. Method/rationale: Educational psychologists (EPs) can make a distinctive contribution in this area because of: (1) their knowledge of adolescent and young adult development; (2) their skills in relational connection in time-limited assessment contexts; and (3) the value they place on person-centred approaches. This paper outlines one approach to psychological assessment that prioritises collaboration with clients aged 16-25 and emphasises understanding the meaning they make of their subjective experience of the world. Findings/implications: The use of projective techniques, where a free-flowing response to a stimulus was used as the basis of a dialogue with the client, is described in the broader context of collaborative assessment. Illustrative case studies that serve as the basis for reflection on experience are explored, with common themes identified. The benefits of the approach, especially in terms of supporting clients and for practitioner learning, are highlighted. Limitations: This approach, whilst facilitated by qualified and trainee EPs, has been developed in a specialist multidisciplinary clinical context. Challenges in using projective techniques as part of collaborative assessments, as well as capacity concerns as regards ongoing training and supervisory requirements, are examined. Conclusions: There are opportunities for the future development of EP practice in this area, as well as promising lines of practice-based research inquiry.
British Psychological Society. St Andrews House, 48 Princess Road East, Leicester, LE1 7DR, UK. Tel: +44-116-254-9568; e-mail: info@bps.org.uk; Web site: http://www.bps.org.uk/publications/journals/journals
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A